Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by goalie
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by goalie
Go find a cardiologist and tell him/her that the path a PVC travels through the ventricle is what CAUSED the PVC to occur in the first place.
That would be quite foolish to say. Is that what you believe I said? More reason to doubt your acumen.


Yeah, it's what you said:

Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The reason a PVC may occur in the presence of a defective/damaged pathway is that it will then be required to take a more circuitous route, thus triggering the PVC.


You stated that the fact that it will be required to take a more circuitous route (after it is triggered) is what triggers it.

Sounds pretty stupid, doesn't it?

Laffin'
If you're unable to discern the difference between my statement and your mischaracterization of it, I'm afraid, again, that there's little for us to discuss.


I think what you wrote is pretty damn clear. It's wrong and makes you look like an idiot who argues about stuff when you don't know WTF you're talking about, but the statement you made is pretty damn clear.....