Originally Posted by ringworm
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by ringworm
For the record...
The point I was making is this...
A seatbelt infraction exist for the sole purpose of extracting revenue.
It is not, in any way, shape, or for meant to change behavior or save lives.
In fact the NTSB can only show a 50/50 chance on being injured with (or without) a seatbelt being in use.
So if its a coin flip how do they justify making a law requiring it?
At the same time what are the injury rates for motorcycle accidents?
In my state I can be pulled over by a bike cop for not wearing a seatbelt in a truck with 4 airbags while carrying people in the truck bed.
That's fkin ridiculous.


The anti-vacer thinks seat belts don't save lives.

What a surprise. crazy


Let's make a law against everything that takes lives and leave choice out of it.
So let's start at the top killers...
Poor Diet and lack of exercise.
Want to set up checkpoints at burger king?
Mandate exercise?
Force feed statins to fat kids?

Personally, I don't GAF!
I drive a 72 with lap belts. Cops gonna have to be riding on top of a city bus to see if I'm wearing one.


I never said it should be a law.

I was commenting on your display of ignorance, and how it didn't surprise me considering your previous comments on things such as vaccines.

The two simplest, lowest cost things a person can do to extend their life expectancy is to be vaccinated, and wear your seat-belt, and you don't believe in either one.

You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell