|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,314 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,314 Likes: 1 |
Screw you! I'm voting for Trump again!
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the 24HCF.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,226
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,226 |
I still remember one guy I hunted with ~25 years ago. He had a nice custom Mauser "with an Ackley Iprovement". I asked him what powder he was using and he just looked at me funny and said he didn't handload Okay, about spit my breakfast on my keyboard. Hysterical. Thank you; all of my AI's now simply possess "Ackley Improvements." Sounds far more mysterious and elegant.
Murphy was a grunt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
Did you get more speed, w/o over pressure loads, and longer case life? Jerry
What have your experiences with AI's been? Sorry to be detained. I had a ditch full of leaves to burn before we are 'supposed' to get heavy rain tomorrow. Sincerely, I never thot the minimal gains of AIs were worth the expense of chamber reaming and bother of fire forming. I know some don't fire form but that's personal preference. I read 'this week' here on the fire that the..... 280 AI = 7mm RM performance. I don't believe that at normal working pressure. YMMV Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927 |
My 7RM is a 280 AI Improved and 28 Nosler Light. Boils down to handloading IMO, and I'm beginning to run out of give a schit for it.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
My 7RM is a 280 AI Improved ... I'd believe that. Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364 |
My 7RM is a 280 AI Improved ... I'd believe that. Jerry Especially if you Long Throat the 7 !
History May Not Repeat, But it Rhymes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,361 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,361 Likes: 1 |
About the only thing and I do mean the only thing that John and I don't agree on are the improved cartridges. I have what I think are 3 of the best. A 7x57AI, 257AI, and the 250AI. Yes there are some like the 35Whelen AI and the 30-30AI that don't make a lot of sense but there are some that are worth your trouble. Once a man gets 40 fire formed cases he's got a lifetime supply of ammo. powdr I'm almost inclined to agree with you on the 7X57, .257 and .250 AI's mainly because SAAMI won't allow data using modern pressures for those cartridges forcing us to go by guess and by gosh working up modern loads for those cartridges. That's been a gripe of mine long before there was an internet. I load for the 7x57 and .257 Bob but have only shot a friend's .250 Sav. while helping him work up reloads for his early Sav. 99. At least with my two cartridges I see no need for improvement. On the 7x57 I load to 7-08 levels and go with that. The Bob is a bit trickier so it's still a work in progress. Paul B.
Our forefathers did not politely protest the British.They did not vote them out of office, nor did they impeach the king,march on the capitol or ask permission for their rights. ----------------They just shot them. MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364 |
A 250AI is more skookum fit in a SA, regardless of what many say.
^ This John's article mentions loads for a Better Bob that are just shy of 3" in a NULA 24. methinks that is a typo, probably a Model 20 w/3" magazine.long-throating = another dimensional refinement ( improvement )
History May Not Repeat, But it Rhymes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,816 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,816 Likes: 1 |
A 250AI is more skookum fit in a SA, regardless of what many say.
I love it when you talk Alaskan.
"Be sure you're right. Then go ahead." Fess Parker as Davy Crockett
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,371
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,371 |
I have not yet seen the issue of Handloader so have not read the article. No discussion of Improved cartridges is boring. Certainly two cartridges which epitomize the possibilities of the Improved cartridge shape are the .30-30AI and the .25-35AI. The two cartridges realizing a significant Improvement in performance as a result of higher pressure.
Few of us have read enough of PO’s writing to really understand what his mind set was. PO wrote for the day, not for posterity.
Two of the more interesting articles on Improved cartridges are:
How Improved is it By William F. Wieman H. P. White Laboratory THE AMERICAN RIFLEMAN DECEMBER 1953
'Improved' Cartridges By P. O. Ackley American Rifleman October 1954
PO in answering his critics left us with two interesting quotes:
“The word 'improved' is an unfortunate choice, and just grew up in connection with certain developments which were made with several objectives. One consideration is increased velocity. Another is mechanical improvement, which results in minimizing certain faults of standard cartridges.”
My all-time favorite PO Quote:
“At the beginning of these comments certain things were pointed out as possible improvements, but nothing was said concerning pressure. Whether the handloader or wildcat enthusiast is right or wrong, he is interested in several things, most important of which are increased velocity and whether the bolt stays in the gun. If he can achieve these two results without serious complications, he is not overly concerned with the actual pressure readings in pounds per square inch.”
Slim
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
powdr Campfire Tracker Yes there are some like the 35Whelen AI and the 30-30AI that don't make a lot of sense... powdr This was posted on P 3 ^^^^^^^^ Certainly two cartridges which epitomize the possibilities of the Improved cartridge shape are the .30-30AI and the .25-35AI. The two cartridges realizing a significant Improvement in performance as a result of higher pressure.
Apparently opinions vary. I don't have one on the 30-30 AI. Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,061 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,061 Likes: 1 |
P.O. rechambered my Ruger 77 to 250AI.Been using the same 20 cases since 1982!! [img:center] [/img]
Last edited by sqweeler; 12/12/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 545
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 545 |
I still remember one guy I hunted with ~25 years ago. He had a nice custom Mauser "with an Ackley Iprovement". I asked him what powder he was using and he just looked at me funny and said he didn't handload Okay, about spit my breakfast on my keyboard. Hysterical. Thank you; all of my AI's now simply possess "Ackley Improvements." Sounds far more mysterious and elegant. Mysterious for sure. A guy at work inherited a "custom 30'06 Mauser". He said it shot great, but did weird things to the brass. I asked him to bring in a fired case and sure enough - "Ackley Improvements"'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927 |
I thought the only way to improve a .25 caliber round was to make it .26 caliber.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,732 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,732 Likes: 1 |
Years ago, I used to chat with a gunsmith here in Canada named Ellwood Epps. He and Ackley talked about improving cartridges back in the days when chambers were not created using equipment controlled by computers.
In a nutshell, Ellwood said there were three reasons to improve a case: to clean up the chamber, increase case life and obtain better velocity. Of the three, cleaning up the chamber was the number one reason to improve. Next was case life. Velocity increases ran third.
You have to remember that this was in the days before short and fat were in vogue and most magnums were bottles of champagne. Brass was harder to come by; there were a lot more surplus rifles - including surplus single shots - and civilian industry (Rem and Win) was less involved in cartridge development.
Ellwood sold, repaired and played with a lot of 303 British rifles here. Their chambers were all over the place WRT shape. Some chambers were too long and one firing was all you got from a case. This was unacceptable to him. There had to be a way to fix it.
He consulted with Ackley about improvements. In part, because of the atrocious chambers. He also looked at the 303 cartridge. It was a rimmed cartridge that featured a droopy 19th century design and 16 degree shoulders. The same would be said of the 30-30, the Hornet and others.
Commercial factories like Remington and Winchester didn't have large R&D sections working to change the function and feeding of rifle cartridges. This was back when small gunshops or home experimenters did the lion's share of "R&D".
Ackley started using 35 degree shoulder, as did Ellwood. PO changed to a 40 degree shoulder, while Ellwood stayed with the 35.
Ellwood's primary concern, horrible chambers, was virtually eliminated with a finishing reamer. Like other gunsmiths of the time, he removed the barrel, took a thread off the back and reinstalled it. Then he took a finishing reamer and cleaned up or "improved" the chamber. In effect, it was tighter. A better fit for the unfired cartridge.
He could have simply tightened things up by chambering again in 303 British, but the cases would still distort. It would just take a little longer. Reducing the taper and sharpening the shoulders of the 303, a rimmed cartridge, increased its useful life.
For Ellwood at least, more velocity at the same pressure level was just icing on the cake.
I'm not really sure when "AI-ing" a cartridge was done only for the purpose of increasing velocity, and not to clean up a chamber and improve case life. It seems to me that things got turned around.
A few other things. When experimenters were improving almost everything, there were a lot more rimmed cartridges and single shot rifles around. The feeding problems associated with AIed cartridges were not as much of a problem. In the early part of the 20th century, rimless cartridges took over. Severe tapers and droopy shoulders were great once upon a time, but design requirements changed with increased production and use of the bolt action. AIed cartridges were a logical progression for shooters using smokeless powder and bolts.
Safe Shooting! Steve Redgwell www.303british.comGet your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain Member - Professional Outdoor Media Association of Canada
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,311 Likes: 9
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,311 Likes: 9 |
Love the 250 whether she's christmas tree or tall timber. Fine cartridge made better by (sorry for the redundancy) improving.
_______________________________________________________ An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
LOL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748 |
I've yet to use an AI that got less speed and shorter case life.
I've never understood the arguments against AI given those two facts. Even if only incremental velocity increases such as with larger calibers, more is more, and the brass will be easier to work with. All good.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,179 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,179 Likes: 1 |
He could have simply tightened things up by chambering again in 303 British, but the cases would still distort. It would just take a little longer. Reducing the taper and sharpening the shoulders of the 303, a rimmed cartridge, increased its useful life.
So, when you say cases would still distort in a tight 303 chamber, just what would be the reasoning behind this? GD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927 |
The MKIV 303 that we had growing up was a case splitting mofo with anything that wasn't milsurp.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,732 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,732 Likes: 1 |
The MKIV 303 that we had growing up was a case splitting mofo with anything that wasn't milsurp. Old, Cordite filled brass had a tendency to do that - made worse by rifles with long chambers. Kind of a one, two punch. That was the reason I converted my first No 4 to Epps. It was a 1942 Savage 2 groove with a chamber a mile long. Cartridges came out constantly split or separated.
Safe Shooting! Steve Redgwell www.303british.comGet your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain Member - Professional Outdoor Media Association of Canada
|
|
|
|
81 members (007FJ, 35, 444Matt, 7mm_Loco, 6mmCreedmoor, 12 invisible),
1,481
guests, and
866
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,370
Posts18,488,311
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|