Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire If your LGBT, the bakery has to cook for you, but if you're pro AR-15, it's OK to refuse??

When 50 people, plus your immediate family, tell you that you're an idiot, you might want to listen. Idiot.

Figure it out.
It's pretty obvious.

Steelhead, it's obvious you can't read either, so you can save your childish rambling for someone who cares:

*** You are ignoring this user ***
Toggle the display of this post

A few things to keep in mind: human rights are the only rights you can sue other citizens for, courts decree which rights are human rights and they change with levels of acceptable perversion, Constitutional Rights are rights granted by the government, people can infringe on Constitutional rights without recourse, and obviously, the government can too.

I am quite aware of who has had their rights trampled.

I simply asked you to make your expressions here a little more clear. If your expressive limits have been reached Bless your heart...

LGBT is not a sex, it's a perversion just as radical Islam is not a religion but a perversion of a religion.

Technically, defense of the 2A is not "an immutable characteristic", such as race, creed, gender, sexual orientation, etc., as defined and decided by the SCOTUS.

A property owner ought to always have the right to deny entry or service to any person or persons of their choosing for whatever reason they determine. That is where the SCOTUS went off the tracks on the bakery case, but it applies here as well.

Of course, that doesn't prevent others from boycotting the business of an idiot or bigot and shutting it down, either, and that is the proper course of action with this bitch in Maine. She has her property and gets to make the calls as to whom she serves. Others get to make the call as to whether she does enough business to stay open. The courts need not be involved here, and ought not have been involved in the bakery case.

So in short, what you are saying is that you're a c&nt and every woman in your family is tired of you bleeding cuny dragging all over the furniture.

GOT IT!

If you can't figure out a very clear, unambiguous statement then the problem isn't that what he said doesn't make sense (because it does) it's that you can't or won't comprehend the obvious.

So one can assume she is also refusing to allow service in her establishment to LEOs? But that's Potland so what do you expect....

It will be funny the first time some Afro Ghetto Trash walks thru the door, holds the place up and she calls the cops...

any Afro Ghetto trash with any brains will know that this lady's place is the safest place in Potland to walk in and hold up the joint....

As long as Three Dollar Dewey's still let's me in I'll be okay in Portland.

As long as Three Dollar Dewey's still let's me in I'll be okay in Portland.

They are as clear as they need to be for one of average intelligence to understand.

Just because LEO's sometimes use those guns in the course of performing their duties doesn't necessarily mean they "condone" them or own them personally.

There's no way she can enforce it anyway, so it's really a waste of energy to get your panties in a wad over it all.

Pretty much.

Just like gun free Zone signs. The only person who will find out I'm carryin, is going to have more to worry about....for a very short time

Told you before. Gun Owners are the new negroes....




Society demonized cigarette smokers to the point that it is now part of the social conscience. They are working on doing the same with gun owners.

Islam is a religion. You have been sucked in to the left's lie. Read all about it in their book. The vast majority of Muslim are like the vast majority of Christians. They claim the name, but don't obey their Rule Book.[b][/b]

Typical lost sheep.

How would the numbers compare,

Deaths per year by AR-15 - vs - Deaths per year by AIDS.

Scotus got the Sweet cakes decision wrong.

Your wrong in believing there is no discrimination by the lady who is against AR owners. That discrimination is is just as real and blatant as Sweet Cakes was toward the militant LGBT couple.

I personally am an equal opportunity discriminator and believe that the LGBT's should be discriminated against just as equally as the AR owners and business owners can choose who they want to do business with.

The only real difference is queers are a protected class and AR owners aren't. I believe that neither class should be protected as one class far outnumbers the other and through the element 82 option can protect itself quite well.

I also am thoroughly convinced that you are a d#$k with ears...