24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
http://www.hcn.org/articles/the-wests-coal-giant-is-going-down/print_view

The smokestacks of the Navajo Generation Station rise 775 feet from the sere landscape of the Navajo Nation in northern Arizona, just three miles away from the serpentine, stagnant blue wound in sandstone known as Lake Powell. Red rock cliffs and the dark and heavy hump of Navajo Mountain loom in the background. Since construction began in 1969, the coal plant and its associated mine on Black Mesa have provided millions of dollars to the Navajo and Hopi tribes and hundreds of jobs to local communities, as well as electricity to keep the lights on and air conditioners humming in the metastasizing cities of Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas and Los Angeles. Yet they’ve also stood as symbols of the exploitation of Native Americans, of the destruction of the land, and of the sullying of the air, all to provide cheap power to the Southwest.

But coal power is no longer the best energy bargain. And on Monday the plant's four private utility owners, led by the Salt River Project, voted to shut down the plant at the end of 2019, some 25 years ahead of schedule. When the giant turbines come to a halt and the towers topple in the coming years, the plant will become a new symbol, this one of a transforming energy economy and an evolving electrical grid that is slowly rendering these soot-stained, mechanical megaliths obsolete.

[Linked Image]

Here’s what you need to know about the plant, the mine and the coming closure:

The closure will deeply wound local economies, particularly in Page, LeChee, Kaibeto and Kayenta.

• 935 — Full-time employees in 2014 of Navajo Generating Station, the Kayenta Coal Mine on Black Mesa, which exists only to fuel the plant, and the 78-mile electric railroad that carries coal from the mine to the plant.

• 90 — Percent of those workers that are Native American.

• $141,500 — Average payroll expenditure per employee (wages, salaries, benefits, etc.)

In addition to these jobs, both mine and plant have contractors for various purposes and each of the power plant’s three units requires a major overhaul every three years, which temporarily employs an additional 400 or more people. These are highly coveted jobs here on the Navajo Nation, which deals with high unemployment and chronic poverty.

2. The operating budgets of the Navajo Nation and the Hopi tribe will take a severe beating.

Both the Hopi and Navajo tribes got the short end of the stick — a royalty rate of just 3.3 percent — when Peabody Coal first got the leases to mine Black Mesa in the 1960s. The attorney representing the Hopi tribe, John Boyden, was actually on Peabody’s payroll at the time, and managed to get a sham tribal government to sign over mining rights against the objections of traditional Hopis, as chronicled by writer and law professor Charles Wilkinson. The mines — Black Mesa and Kayenta — forced families to relocate, destroyed grazing land, dried up springs and wrecked ancestral Hopi shrines and other sites.

The tribes fought back and eventually negotiated better terms. Both tribes now rely heavily on royalty and lease payments from the mine and the power plant, even as tribal members fight against the polluting and water-gulping ways of plant and mine.

• $54 million — Total annual royalties, bonus payments and water-use fees paid to the Hopi tribe and the Navajo Nation as of 2015 by the owners of both the Navajo Generating Station and the Kayenta Coal Mine. The Hopi tribe depends on these payments for more than 80 percent of its total budget. This amount would have gone up considerably after 2019.

• $1.7 million — Approximate amount donated yearly by Peabody Western Coal Company and Salt River Project — the plant’s operator — on local scholarships and charity.

• $9.9 million — Cost of electricity purchased by the Kayenta Coal Mine yearly from the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority.

Prior to Monday's announcement, the plant's owners and the Navajo Nation were refashioning the lease, which runs out in 2019, to make it more favorable for the tribe. Peabody also hoped to expand the mine.

3. The air (and water and land) will be a lot cleaner without Navajo Generating Station, one of the biggest polluters in the West.

• 20 million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent — Amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the power plant (carbon dioxide) and the mine (methane) each year.

• 8.6 million metric tons CO2 — Amount of greenhouse gases emitted yearly by a natural gas plant generating the same amount of electricity as the Navajo Generating Station. This does not account for leaks during natural gas production, processing, transportation and storage.

• 472, 4370, 259 — Pounds of mercury, selenium and arsenic, respectively, that spew from the power plant’s smokestacks each year. These elements are toxic to wildlife and humans and have shown up in relatively high concentrations in fish in the Grand Canyon and the San Juan River upstream from Lake Powell, as well as in precipitation at Mesa Verde National Park. Natural gas combustion emits only negligible amounts of these elements.

• 1.3 million — Tons of coal combustion waste produced by the plant each year, about 75 percent of which is disposed of nearby, with the rest sold for use in other applications.

4. The plant lies at the heart of the water-energy nexus.

Both the Kayenta Mine and the Navajo Generating Station use large amounts of water. The Bureau of Reclamation owns a large share of the plant, and uses most of its electricity to run the pumps for the Central Arizona Project, which delivers Colorado River water to Arizona cities.

• 1,200 acre feet — Amount of groundwater the mine draws from the Navajo Aquifer each year. (Prior to the 2005 closure of the Mohave Generating Station, another 3,000 acre feet was used to slurry the coal 273 miles from the mine to the plant, drying up important springs in the area).

• 28,000 acre feet (9 billion gallons) — Amount of water drawn from Lake Powell each year for steam generation and cooling at the plant. This is all consumptive use, meaning none of this water is returned to the source.

• 3 million megawatt-hours — Amount of electricity the CAP uses to lift, transport and deliver 1.6 million acre feet of Colorado River water to Phoenix and Tucson annually. (Enough to power about 240,000 Arizona homes for one year).

5. Economics, not the so-called war on coal or federal environmental protections, is the primary factor shutting down the plant.

Salt River Project officials have been very clear on this point. They note that it’s now cheaper for them to buy power for their 1 million customers from other sources than it is to generate power at Navajo, thanks mostly to low natural gas prices. A November 2016 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that the Central Arizona Project pays about 15 percent more for electricity from the power plant — of which it is part owner — than it would if it bought power wholesale from the Mead trading hub located near Las Vegas.

None of this will change even if President Donald Trump rolls back the Clean Power Plan or other regulations put in place by the Obama administration. In fact, if a drill-heavy energy policy is put into place, it will increase natural gas supplies, thus increasing the spread between natural gas and coal. Having said that, California’s move away from coal power lowers the value of the plant’s power, and the requirement that the plant install nitrous oxide-reducing equipment increases costs — so environmental protections do play a role, albeit a smaller one than economics.

6. It’s a sign of the times.

Although it’s happening slowly, the electrical landscape is evolving. The days of vertically integrated utilities that own huge, centralized power stations and their own balkanized grids are giving way to a new era in which utilities purchase power generated by smaller plants that are connected to larger, regional grids.

California’s independent grid operator has already joined up with NV Energy, PacifiCorp and other Western utilities to form an energy imbalance market, which allows the utilities to share generators — be they wind, solar, natural gas or coal — to “balance” their grids in real time, rather than having to rely only on their own generators. These utilities are hoping to expand this market and then take it to the next level of a regional, integrated grid in coming years. The closure of Navajo Generating Station adds new urgency to this effort.

7. What’s next?

The decision to close the plant came as a surprise. Until several weeks ago, the plant’s owners were negotiating a new lease with the Navajo Nation and considering shutting one of three units and replacing it with other energy sources. Meanwhile, the mine was looking to expand. Outright closure this soon was not on anyone’s radar, so there is no firm transition plan in place. The Bureau of Reclamation and Peabody are looking for ways to keep the plant running beyond 2019, but they'd have to do it without the other owners and against economic headwinds.

When the Mohave Generating Station and the Black Mesa Mine closed in 2005, environmentalists and tribes pushed the California Public Utilities Commission to create a revolving “just transition” fund with money earned from the sale of sulfur dioxide credits from the shuttered plant. The fund, the value of which dwindled as sulfur credit prices fell, is supposed to help develop renewable energy on the reservations.

There are little or no such credits available for Navajo Generating Station, however, so that approach won’t work here. The owners of the plant could work with the tribes to replace some of the lost electricity generation by building new solar, wind or other plants on the reservations, where there is ample potential for renewable energy development. Two major transmission systems are associated with the plant, and could be taken over by the tribes to move solar or wind power to the south and west. The water rights could be turned over to the tribes, for use in agriculture or other purposes.

Jonathan Thompson is a contributing editor at High Country News. He is currently writing a book about the Gold King Mine spill. Follow @jonnypeace


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
GB1

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 79,321
B
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
B
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 79,321
Originally Posted by Sycamore


the coal plant and its associated mine on Black Mesa have provided millions of dollars to the Navajo and Hopi tribes.

Yet they’ve also stood as symbols of the exploitation of Native Americans,


Exploiting somebody doesn't cost millions of dollars.

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,963
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,963
Don't worry,

Trump will save it.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Quote
The attorney representing the Hopi tribe, John Boyden, was actually on Peabody’s payroll at the time, and managed to get a sham tribal government to sign over mining rights against the objections of traditional Hopis, as chronicled by writer and law professor Charles Wilkinson.




I'm betting the "sham" tribal government was drunk on T bird. grin


Son of a liberal: " What did you do in the War On Terror, Daddy?"

Liberal father: " I fought the Americans, along with all the other liberals."

MOLON LABE





Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Don't worry,

Trump will save it.

from the article....
Quote

Salt River Project officials have been very clear on this point. They note that it’s now cheaper for them to buy power for their 1 million customers from other sources than it is to generate power at Navajo, thanks mostly to low natural gas prices. A November 2016 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory found that the Central Arizona Project pays about 15 percent more for electricity from the power plant — of which it is part owner — than it would if it bought power wholesale from the Mead trading hub located near Las Vegas.

None of this will change even if President Donald Trump rolls back the Clean Power Plan or other regulations put in place by the Obama administration. In fact, if a drill-heavy energy policy is put into place, it will increase natural gas supplies, thus increasing the spread between natural gas and coal.


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,627
S
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,627
Coal has a tough row to hoe. Given the cost of scrubbing requirements and other coal based overhead, natural gas has become increasingly more cost efficient and will most likely continue do so if production increases as it appears will happen. And Peabody is still trying to come out of bankruptcy. Back in the summer of 2008 before yall's socialist wannabe dicktater got elected stock hit over $1300. It broke way down but came back to over $1100 about 3 years later before being beaten down for good by the sworn enemy of capitalism. At one point the stock sold for, so sad, as low as 55 CENTS a share. It closed today at $2.75 and that's in a game of musical chairs. Common stock will be worthless at exit. Some folks still believe there will be some bones tossed to common shareholders and are gambling on the outcome. Anybody caught holding when the music stops is sucker bait. Perhaps there is a way negotiable to bring the coal industry back; never count Trump out. But looks to me to be a dubious possibility unless alternative energy sources (natural gas now, enhanced nuclear possibilities?) somehow loose the cost/kw advantage. YMMV

Chart


“When Tyranny becomes Law, Rebellion becomes Duty”

Colossians 3:17 (New King James Version)
"And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him."
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Any time you're mining, you're putting yourself out of business.

Peabody has had a lot of ownership changes in the last 40 years.

But the Black Mesa/Kayenta Mine complex was/is an amazing setup. One mine had a 273 mile long slurry line to one power plant, the other had a 21 mile overland conveyor to a silo that feeds a 3 trips a day train that makes a 78 mile one way run to the other power plant.

Sycamore



Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,627
S
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,627
Yeah, they can do some engineering. Used to live very close to some company land a conveyor crossed carrying coal from mine to washer. Ran maybe 20 miles or so. I grew up hunting that land mostly for turkey. That dang line could start up at the worst times. Can't remember the name given to it but recall a bunch of us teenagers would drive out to a night time overlook to watch the biggest drag line in the US operate. Least, that's what we told the girls. ;)grins


“When Tyranny becomes Law, Rebellion becomes Duty”

Colossians 3:17 (New King James Version)
"And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him."
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,681
J
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
J
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,681
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Any time you're mining, you're putting yourself out of business.

Peabody has had a lot of ownership changes in the last 40 years.

But the Black Mesa/Kayenta Mine complex was/is an amazing setup. One mine had a 273 mile long slurry line to one power plant, the other had a 21 mile overland conveyor to a silo that feeds a 3 trips a day train that makes a 78 mile one way run to the other power plant.

Sycamore



If we cut off welfare to low income dimocraps they wouldnt keep jacking up the population that requires more electricity.

Dimocrap programs boost anti-earth population growth, an anathema to Ma Natures health, but very necessary for larger dimocrap voting constituancys.


Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.

A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.

"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".

I Dindo Nuffin
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,370
Campfire Savant
Offline
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,370
There will be a lot more drunk Indians without those jobs.

IC B3

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,709
E
EdM Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
E
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,709
Originally Posted by Sycamore

from the article....
Quote


None of this will change even if President Donald Trump rolls back the Clean Power Plan or other regulations put in place by the Obama administration. In fact, if a drill-heavy energy policy is put into place, it will increase natural gas supplies, thus increasing the spread between natural gas and coal.


And there is the right answer, the proper way forward.


Conduct is the best proof of character.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,637
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,637
Originally Posted by hanco
There will be a lot more drunk Indians without those jobs.


How did you know the OP was an Indian? grin


Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 53,303
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 53,303
This whole deal has been out on the table for quite some time, the "Decision" made. The timing of the formalization and release of this plan is patently agenda driven. As we all know to well, when everybody involved has their own agenda, it can become hard to see the woods for the trees.
The main and over theme / overriding emphasis of the OP article seems to be on COAL, and it's "enviroquences."... (ENVIROQUENCES) new buzz word, straight off this desk).
I'd note it makes only a few brief comments about another, and perhaps even more complicating issue,...WATER.
Here's some additional commentary that drifted in on my regular E-mail yesterday AM, and a link to it's source article which is WELL worth the read in it's entirety.
Excerpt:
Quote
In 2010, CAP officials reckoned that closing the Navajo plant would have increased the cost of electricity to pump water by 50 to 300 percent and they would lose $US 50 million per year in the sale of surplus power. Surplus power, which is the difference between the federal government’s allocation and what CAP requires, is sold to pay down Arizona’s share of the CAP construction cost. The remaining balance is roughly $US 1.2 billion.

The U.S. natural gas boom, which ramped up just before CAP made its 2010 forecast, flipped the calculations. In a February 16 presentation to the agency’s board, CAP officials estimated that they would have saved $US 38.5 million in energy costs in 2016 by buying power on the market instead of from the Navajo station. Even though surplus power sales would have declined by $US 12 million in this scenario, CAP still would have come out ahead last year from switching energy sources.
The net savings of $US 26.5 million would have been expressed in lower water bills for tribes, farmers, and cities. Farmers buying water from CAP, for instance, pay only the cost of pumping water. In 2016 that rate, including rebates, was $US 57 per acre-foot using Navajo station power. With power purchased on the market, however, CAP figures the charge would have been $US 49 per acre-foot, a savings of 14 percent. One acre-foot is 326,000 gallons.

....and another excerpt:
Quote
Another huge factor is water. The Navajo Generating Station has rights to consume 34,100 acre-feet of Colorado River water per year. The water is withdrawn from Lake Powell and not returned to the river system. The plant, however, does not use the entire allocation. Over the last 15 years, annual use has ranged from 26,000 acre-feet to 29,000 acre-feet.

The water rights are owned by the state of Arizona and could be reallocated if the plant were to close. The existing rights are part of Arizona’s 50,000 acre-foot Upper Colorado River Basin allocation, which restricts the water used to the northeastern corner of the state, Leslie Meyers, manager of Reclamation’s Phoenix office, told Circle of Blue. In practice, that means only on the Navajo Nation.

The above excerpts from:

Link: http://www.circleofblue.org/2017/water-energy/utilities-move-break-arizonas-coal-water-link/

I'm thinking we'd better have a damn well squared away approach as to how this all gets "decided', and by whom. We just SAW what "Native American Environmental Interest Groups" do to water, and water rights. I wouldn't get to warm a feeling knowing that this particular group/tribe of NAs are going to handle it any better.

GTC


Member, Clan of the Border Rats
-- “Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.”- Mark Twain





Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,608
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,608
Smaller gas turbine powered electric plants are cheaper to build and operate and will soon kill off most coal plants. They can be up and at full power in just a few minutes and then turned off just as quickly. They're very efficient when combined with heat capturing steam generation. The fuel is cheap and clean. Coals' only hope is export sales.


‘TO LEARN WHO RULES OVER YOU, SIMPLY FIND OUT WHO YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE’

Conspiracy theorists are the ones who see it all coming…

You are the carbon they want to eliminate !

I’m Uber Deplorable Ultra MAGA !
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 53,303
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 53,303
The last place I lived in Alberta, I had a line REAL close, and along with all the neighbors there, paid an "industrial bulk rate" for NG.
It's a WONDERFUL fuel, and I hope we do see the emergence of the "Capstone Turbine" ( one moving part) on both large and small scales as one of the driving forces of another century of greatness.

GTC


Member, Clan of the Border Rats
-- “Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.”- Mark Twain





Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736
The technology and engineering exist to convert the facility to natural gas. It will be a huge mistake to go to solar and windmills. Other nations are moving away from sun and wind as the wild swings in power production is destroying their infrastructure to store power.


My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 53,303
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 53,303
Originally Posted by bigwhoop
The technology and engineering exist to convert the facility to natural gas. It will be a huge mistake to go to solar and windmills. Other nations are moving away from sun and wind as the wild swings in power production is destroying their infrastructure to store power.


What we were visualizing in Alberta when I left is apparently now established to some extent,....BIG growing operations under glass and Polymers,...the seedbeds warmed by the exhaust from the NG power gen operations.
GTC


Member, Clan of the Border Rats
-- “Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.”- Mark Twain





Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
I thought the thrust of the article was:

a) coal is non-competitive with cheap NG for electrical generation at a large scale, and


b) shutting down a big plant and its associated big mine have big consequences for local economies.

Crossfire's link was to a very good article,

http://www.circleofblue.org/2017/water-energy/utilities-move-break-arizonas-coal-water-link/

I recommend anyone with the least interest in the subject take a look.

with an even better picture of the plant. (looking SE, rather than N)

[Linked Image]

Crossfires closing comment was laughable:

Quote

...I'm thinking we'd better have a damn well squared away approach as to how this all gets "decided', and by whom. We just SAW what "Native American Environmental Interest Groups" do to water, and water rights. I wouldn't get to warm a feeling knowing that this particular group/tribe of NAs are going to handle it any better...


You need to do a bit more research on the Colorado River Compact of 1922, the Winters doctrine of 1906, Arizona v. California (1931, 1934, 1936, 1963, 1964, 1966, 1979, 1983, 1984, and 2000)and in general "The Law of the River" as it is known.

My best guess is that following lengthy and expensive adjudication, that Upper Basin AZ water is going to be allocated to The Navajo Tribe of Indians (formal name) and they are going to "lease" it to the highest bidder downstream, probably MWD, but maybe IID.

Or maybe DOI will keep that plant going,through subsidies, in the name of MAGA. And you and I will pay for that, just like the wall.

Savvy?


Sycamore


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
D
djs Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Don't worry,

Trump will save it.


the only way Trump (or anyone else) can save coal is to kill the natural gas industry. Currently, natural gas is much cheaper than coal and the economics of coal don't work at current market prices.

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000
"just three miles away from the serpentine, stagnant blue wound in sandstone known as Lake Powell." almost in the first sentence.
I suspect the author of this piece read "the monkey wrench gang" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monkey_Wrench_Gang

always liked his writings.
I was around when that glen canyon dam was first built.
I still have mixed feelings.
but mostly identify with what abbey was conveying in the book.
imagine sycamore read the book too.
That word "wound" caught my eye.
a lot of abbey's quotes on things are really good:

https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/e/edward_abbey.html

https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/234706-desert-solitaire

Water, water, water....There is no shortage of water in the desert but exactly the right amount , a perfect ratio of water to rock, water to sand, insuring that wide free open, generous spacing among plants and animals, homes and towns and cities, which makes the arid West so different from any other part of the nation. There is no lack of water here unless you try to establish a city where no city should be.”
― Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness

i think of this a lot when i think of phoenix and tucson

Last edited by RoninPhx; 02/25/17.

THE BIRTH PLACE OF GERONIMO
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

78 members (10gaugemag, 808outdoors, 257robertsimp, 7mm_Loco, 13 invisible), 1,204 guests, and 693 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,868
Posts18,478,685
Members73,948
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.124s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9193 MB (Peak: 1.1212 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-30 07:48:09 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS