|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,413
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,413 |
It will be interesting to see how the other states like California try to twist this to suit their ridiculous rules for obtaining a concealed carry permit . This ruling is pretty clear in that it applies to all instances, not just the NY case IMO.... My guess -- having lived in Los Angeles for 36 years -- is that the various California city councils and county supervisors will pass laws to establish steep and onerous fees for the worker peasants to obtain a permit/license. Such as ..... "Yes sir, here's the application for a CCW. Oh, by the way, the fee is $5,000.00. The license/permit is only valid for one year and you'll have to renew each year. That fee will be $5,000.00, too. Have a nice day" Just watch and see. L.W. You can bet on something like this. And regardless of what the ruling is, NYC will continue to enforce their laws.
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”
Patrick Henry
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,019
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,019 |
Next, these questions need answered- what other right requires a permit? Do you need a permit to exercise free speech? Do you need a permit that says police need probable cause to enter your house? How about a nice easy, not so expensive license from your local Sheriffs department that says you can have a trial by jury?
How about a mandatory safety class before you’re allowed to vote?
Intellectual honesty is the most important character trait in human beings.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,418
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,418 |
You can bet on something like this. And regardless of what the ruling is, NYC will continue to enforce their laws. I don't think so. They will pass new laws for a new pistol license that meets the Court's criteria and they will pass laws restricting carrying in certain "sensitive" public areas, but it can't be the same old law. Neither the NYC mayor or NY Governor have said that they will ignore the Court's decision. They can't. I love how our demented ruler said that the decision was "unconstitutional". Like he would know.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 10,153 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 10,153 Likes: 4 |
That's why the Left hates him.....He tells the truth no matter who it PO's.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,743 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,743 Likes: 2 |
GOD Almighty blessed us with Justice Thomas and Bob Hayes for sure. Thomas Sowell and Willie Mays. Dayom. I had his rookie card as a kid. Bleck friend of mine stole it. SOB. And Nipsey Russel and Flip Wilson and Richard Pryor were favorites as was Amos and Andy. God Bless them all. And the Supremes and Charley Pride. Had their tapes. My Lord. Good times. 
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,507 Likes: 15
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,507 Likes: 15 |
I still say ClarenceT knocked the bottom out of Anita Hill's plumbing back in 19&91, I really doo
PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,743 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,743 Likes: 2 |
That's why the Left hates him.....He tells the truth no matter who it PO's. The left hates the truth period. It's why they hate JESUS CHRIST and GOD too.
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,743 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95,743 Likes: 2 |
I still say ClarenceT knocked the bottom out of Anita Hill's plumbing back in 19&91, I really doo You would, you racialist badstid. How much you reckon it cost him? $5? 
Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,044 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,044 Likes: 2 |
I wonder if eyeball and chilinstructor can withhold their "n----r" comments for one thread.
LOL Probably not. That's the way it is with racist cundts. ^^^^This x 100
Last edited by Tarquin; 06/23/22.
Tarquin
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,507 Likes: 15
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,507 Likes: 15 |
I still say ClarenceT knocked the bottom out of Anita Hill's plumbing back in 19&91, I really doo You would, you racialist badstid. How much you reckon it cost him? $5?  yeah about a fiver
PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638 |
We all got REALLY lucky Thomas was the justice who penned this one. Truthfully, I’m a little shocked Roberts would pick him to write the opinion.
He locks the 2A down good and tight, or at least as tight as you can get on a court that contains a couple of known wafflers (Although Roberts has been good on 2A).
Not sure how he could have put it any better. Once again, Thomas reminds me of why he’s been my favorite sitting justice since Scalia died.
This is BIGGER than Heller, IMO.
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle. I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,945 Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,945 Likes: 7 |
My brother pointed out the Bill of Rights are in fact "Articles I through 10." They are not Amendments! Amendment implies some adaptation that might be further "amended" or repealed as in the 18th, regarding Prohibition. Numbering the actual amendments as if continuing a mere list was careless, or cunning, but did cast doubt upon their absolute status. So far the Supremes have upheld the God given view as the apparent intent. The militia language in the Second has muddied the waters considerably, but scholars have pretty much read beyond that stipulation deciding that since all the other rights enumerated obviously pertain to the individual alone, not any temporary group formation, the second is indeed a personal right just as inviolate. The militia language, therefore, clearly indicates bearing arms is a guard against tyranny from whatever quarter, not just gang bangers or burglars or geese, something the Jerry Nadlers of the world find shocking indeed. Any government worth the name can certainly overcome technicalities, however. A few million AR 15's in the wild might not be much of an obstacle either, at first. IRS and Post Office buying lots of ammo sure seems crazy. Walmart alone has dealt a crippling blow by simply ending ammo sales. I appreciate his intent, but they are amendments. They weren't were not enumerated in the original Constitution drafted at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787. They were ratified in 1791. We can thank George Mason, Edmund Randolph, and Elbridge Gerry for holding out and not signing the drafted Constitution in 1787 without including the Bill of Rights. The 2'nd, like any part of the Constitution can be amended away. All it takes is ratification by the states. Or the 2'nd could be erased entirely, and would be, were an entire new constitution be drafted at a constitutional convention. I belive an amendment to eliminate the 2'nd has less chance for ratification than does the "equal rights amendment". How long has the latter been in the works? 100 years now? But be careful what you wish for when wishing for a constitutional convention. There are a lot of Communists out there wishing for that as well.
People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
|
|
|
|
|
143 members (160user, 10Glocks, 3dtestify, AlleghenyMountain, 44mc, 7887mm08, 15 invisible),
1,512
guests, and
856
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,863
Posts18,497,260
Members73,980
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
