|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,535 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,535 Likes: 4 |
What a moron. Like renegade So you suck JeffO's dick and love the taste. Sicko.
Dog I rescued in January
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,535 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,535 Likes: 4 |
Nothing quite says retard like “FOAD”
#amiwrong? Your time is coming.
Dog I rescued in January
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
Nothing quite says retard like “FOAD”
#amiwrong? Your time is coming. Yeah? Do tell.
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
Here it comes. There will be many, many more of these, all around America, because frankly, any reasonable reading of the 14th Sec3 leads to the conclusion that Trump is DQ’d.
But, of course, it remains to be seen what SCOTUS thinks, and they do bat last on this one. It’ll be relatively soon (for a SCOTUS ruling) because otherwise Trump won’t be on primary ballots.
A lawyer from Palm Beach County has filed one of the first legal challenges to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential race under a clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Boynton Beach tax attorney Lawrence Caplan filed the challenge in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the amendment's "disqualification clause" for those who engage in insurrections and rebellion against the United States. The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union.
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,952 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,952 Likes: 3 |
Rumor that Biden wants to create extreme tax on pot and all its derivatives <vape, edibles, etc.> to fund NY state wetback housing. Yea!
Last edited by Mr_TooDogs; 08/25/23.
GOA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,299 Likes: 11
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,299 Likes: 11 |
Has anybody tried to explain to the OP that nobody running for the WH has been charged with insurrection much less been found guilty of it. And you cannot have an unarmed insurrection. No such thing as an unarmed insurrection in accordance with the govt's definition of the offense.
I know the OP is braindead but even an idiot can grasp those points.
You get out of life what you are willing to accept. If you ain't happy, do something about it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,750 Likes: 14
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,750 Likes: 14 |
Here it comes. There will be many, many more of these, all around America, because frankly, any reasonable reading of the 14th Sec3 leads to the conclusion that Trump is DQ’d.
But, of course, it remains to be seen what SCOTUS thinks, and they do bat last on this one. It’ll be relatively soon (for a SCOTUS ruling) because otherwise Trump won’t be on primary ballots.
A lawyer from Palm Beach County has filed one of the first legal challenges to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential race under a clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Boynton Beach tax attorney Lawrence Caplan filed the challenge in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the amendment's "disqualification clause" for those who engage in insurrections and rebellion against the United States. The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union. When was he found guilty,Jeffy?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,750 Likes: 14
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,750 Likes: 14 |
When did the retards of America start equating charges with being guilty?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,952 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,952 Likes: 3 |
Here it comes. There will be many, many more of these, all around America, because frankly, any reasonable reading of the 14th Sec3 leads to the conclusion that Trump is DQ’d.
But, of course, it remains to be seen what SCOTUS thinks, and they do bat last on this one. It’ll be relatively soon (for a SCOTUS ruling) because otherwise Trump won’t be on primary ballots.
A lawyer from Palm Beach County has filed one of the first legal challenges to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential race under a clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Boynton Beach tax attorney Lawrence Caplan filed the challenge in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the amendment's "disqualification clause" for those who engage in insurrections and rebellion against the United States. The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union.
GOA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
Has anybody tried to explain to the OP that nobody running for the WH has been charged with insurrection much less been found guilty of it. And you cannot have an unarmed insurrection. No such thing as an unarmed insurrection in accordance with the govt's definition of the offense.
I know the OP is braindead but even an idiot can grasp those points. Sec 3 of Amendment 14 does not require that anyone be charged much less found guilty. It’s self-executing and literally required, similar to say an election administrator not putting someone on the POTUS ballot who’s under 30 years old. An unarmed insurrection is still an insurrection by common legal definition. I haven’t seen the “govt’s definition”, but I’d like to. Got a link?
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,109 Likes: 66
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,109 Likes: 66 |
Has anybody tried to explain to the OP that nobody running for the WH has been charged with insurrection much less been found guilty of it. And you cannot have an unarmed insurrection. No such thing as an unarmed insurrection in accordance with the govt's definition of the offense.
I know the OP is braindead but even an idiot can grasp those points. Sec 3 of Amendment 14 does not require that anyone be charged much less found guilty. It’s self-executing and literally required, similar to say an election administrator not putting someone on the POTUS ballot who’s under 30 years old. An unarmed insurrection is still an insurrection by common legal definition. I haven’t seen the “govt’s definition”, but I’d like to. Got a link? Forgetting a little detail in US law called presumption of innocence, eh?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
Sigh.
Go back to the first page, there’s links to the recent scholarship around this issue. This isn’t a court case.
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,912 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,912 Likes: 1 |
Here it comes. There will be many, many more of these, all around America, because frankly, any reasonable reading of the 14th Sec3 leads to the conclusion that Trump is DQ’d.
But, of course, it remains to be seen what SCOTUS thinks, and they do bat last on this one. It’ll be relatively soon (for a SCOTUS ruling) because otherwise Trump won’t be on primary ballots.
A lawyer from Palm Beach County has filed one of the first legal challenges to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential race under a clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Boynton Beach tax attorney Lawrence Caplan filed the challenge in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the amendment's "disqualification clause" for those who engage in insurrections and rebellion against the United States. The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union. Trump has not been charged with insurrection or rebellion. Try again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,109 Likes: 66
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,109 Likes: 66 |
Sigh.
Go back to the first page, there’s links to the recent scholarship around this issue. This isn’t a court case. Presumption of innocence permeates every aspect of US jurisprudence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,109 Likes: 66
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,109 Likes: 66 |
Trump has not been charged with insurrection or rebellion. Try again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 8,387 Likes: 12
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 8,387 Likes: 12 |
Interesting that Florida has chosen to be the litmus test, as to whether this is a legally sound theory.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,750 Likes: 14
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,750 Likes: 14 |
When did the retards of America start equating charges with being guilty?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,109 Likes: 22
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 96,109 Likes: 22 |
Here it comes. There will be many, many more of these, all around America, because frankly, any reasonable reading of the 14th Sec3 leads to the conclusion that Trump is DQ’d.
But, of course, it remains to be seen what SCOTUS thinks, and they do bat last on this one. It’ll be relatively soon (for a SCOTUS ruling) because otherwise Trump won’t be on primary ballots.
A lawyer from Palm Beach County has filed one of the first legal challenges to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential race under a clause in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. Boynton Beach tax attorney Lawrence Caplan filed the challenge in federal court in the Southern District of Florida citing the amendment's "disqualification clause" for those who engage in insurrections and rebellion against the United States. The amendment was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, during Reconstruction, and also addressed the citizenship status of freed slaves and the re-integration of the defeated Confederate states back into the Union. Trump has not been charged with insurrection or rebellion. Try again. Yep. I wonder how big the Patriots gun was who told Smith and Fani not to go there? Sounds like they will railroad Trump on the trumped up charges. Qs Shot Heard Round The World? Is that when the left has Antifa and BLM start the riots while wearing face masks and MAGA gear and National Guard is sent to 14 major cities? Do they round up the pukes and hand out LEGAL BALLOTS? Is that how Trump wins? What is meant by, "All assets will be deployed"? Does Trump win the election from prison and then pardon himself? This movie is getting good. I'm glad we know how it ends. The left cant win. We will Make America Great Again. JANUARY 23, WHEN TRUMP PUT ON THE WAR PAINT
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
I Dindo Nuffin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,535 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,535 Likes: 4 |
Has anybody tried to explain to the OP that nobody running for the WH has been charged with insurrection much less been found guilty of it. And you cannot have an unarmed insurrection. No such thing as an unarmed insurrection in accordance with the govt's definition of the offense.
I know the OP is braindead but even an idiot can grasp those points. Sec 3 of Amendment 14 does not require that anyone be charged much less found guilty. It’s self-executing and literally required, similar to say an election administrator not putting someone on the POTUS ballot who’s under 30 years old. An unarmed insurrection is still an insurrection by common legal definition. I haven’t seen the “govt’s definition”, but I’d like to. Got a link? But then you moron if you don't need to be charged or found guilty then you have committed no crime. In that case anyone could be found unable to run for office. As for election interference you could easily charge the FBI, suppressing political speech and important voter information, Crossfire Hurricane, Russia Hoax (attempted coup) pick one. I didn't see any of these things happen on J6 so why are you bringing it up? insurrection ĭn″sə-rĕk′shən noun The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.A rising up; uprising.The act of rising against civil authority or governmental restraint; specifically, the armed resistance of a number of persons to the power of the state; incipient or limited rebellion. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
Dog I rescued in January
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,370 Likes: 4
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,370 Likes: 4 |
Interesting that Florida has chosen to be the litmus test, as to whether this is a legally sound theory. I have no idea how this will play out but the "House" did issue criminal referrals, one of those criminal referrals was for "aiding an insurrection". This might come down to who has the best lawyers and their legal arguments. Jan. 6 committee issues criminal referrals against Trump and lawyer EastmanThe committee alleged violations of four criminal statutes by Trump, in both the run-up to the riot and during the insurrection itself, as it recommended the former president for prosecution to the Justice Department. The charges recommended by the committee are conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction of an official proceeding of Congress, conspiracy to make a false statement and aiding an insurrection.
Remember why, specifically, the Bill of Rights was written...remember its purpose. It was written to limit the power of government over the individual.
There is no believing a liar, even when he speaks the truth.
|
|
|
|
614 members (10Glocks, 1badf350, 12344mag, 10gaugemag, 1234, 10ring1, 76 invisible),
16,889
guests, and
1,035
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,195,311
Posts18,545,602
Members74,060
|
Most Online21,066 May 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|