24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 31 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 30 31
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
E
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
E
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
There were a few others on the kill list

GB1

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,800
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,800
Originally Posted by pabucktail
Originally Posted by JoeBob
I really think that according the logic of Rhod some states are missing a golden opportunity to get rich. All we have to do is pass a law that all personal property that makes it to the state from an owner who lives in another state, no longer belongs to said owner. We confiscate it, or as I prefer to say, “set it free”. We then sell it and split the proceeds. It’s full proof since it would be a great injustice to expect a state to honor the property rights of persons in another state.


Your message is half-gibberish, but perhaps you fail to grasp the part of the issue where the "property" referenced were human beings rather than escaped livestock or purloined equipment? Since it involved human beings, a large portion of country stood opposed to slavery, didn't want to go along with it, and were happy to see it fail. Perhaps we could draw an analogy with abortion in our own time? And no, northerners weren't selling slaves and "splitting the proceeds" with anyone. Also, northerners who failed to go along with slavery program in their own states nullified those laws by not following them, to the point of in some cases arresting federal marshals who attempted to enforce the law. Again, perhaps we could draw an example from our own time of a state standing in opposition to the federal government in regards to illegal aliens....Texas perhaps?
.

Oh, so now you’re in favor of the Doctrine of Nullification. Would that the northern states had been in your camp in the 1830s and the Civil War may have been avoided.

But here is what I understand and you don’t. Slaves were by the law and by the Constitution agreed upon by all parties, just that, property. Your morality doesn’t enter into the law. You don’t get to decide for yourself what laws you will enforce and what ones you won’t because morality is subjective. The Constitution was a contract, agreed to and relied upon by the states. And your side decided it no longer liked the terms. Sp instead of agreeing to dissolve the contract and let the parties depart, you decided to change the terms by force of arms and force the other side to stay and abide by the new terms against its will.

And if we are going to draw analogies, yes, let’s use illegal immigration, but instead of your bullschit, let’s use reality. The reality is that the federal government is refusing to enforce the constitution and protect states against invasion, just like it refused to uphold property rights back then. And just like back then, certain states style themselves as sanctuaries and encourage and actively engage in the subversion of the lawto the detriment of those states wishing to see immigration laws enforced. The sanctuary states decry other states as mean spirited and racist and everything but Christian JUST LIKE THEY DID THEN.

You know when Southerners finally had enough and decided to leave back then, you Yankees should have been happy about it. With the South gone, your states would have been slave free and you would have had no obligation to enforce or ignore regarding fugitive slaves.

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
E
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
E
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
Lincum would’ve been fuqkd if Maryland left

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,498
I
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
I
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,498
In 1865 the Congress passed the 13th amendment outlawing slavery. Lincoln met with Alexander Stephens, the VP of the Confederacy, and suggested the South come back into the union befause it toolk 3/4 of the states to ratify trhe amendment.


Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.

Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,327
9
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
9
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,327
Originally Posted by 7mmbuster
Grant was supposed to be with Lincoln that evening at Fords Theater, but he was sick. Major Henry Rathbone and his date escorted the President and First Lady.
The Major was stabbed and sliced by Booth as he made his way through the President’s box and leaped to the stage.
Reon

Grant did call in sick that night, but the real reason was that his wife thought Mary Todd Lincoln was a lunatic, which isn't far from the truth. Mrs. Grant could not stand to be in the company of Mrs. Lincoln.

And Mr. Lincoln did take many liberties with the Constitution, suspending Habeus Corpus, crushing the draft rebellion in NYC and the Emancipation Proclamation amongst other constitutional indiscretions. Where does it say in the Constitution that the President of the United States can issue "Proclamations", that then become the immediate law of the land? King Abe?

Was it morally justified? Of course. Was it a direct violation of the Constitution? Yes. Lincoln had no constitutional authority to free the slaves with the stroke of a pen. He was guilty of defending the constitution and interpreting the constitution as it suited his agenda. History has given him a pass because the outcome suited history and the victors.


"You cannot invade mainland America. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass"
~Admiral Yamamoto~

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. ~Thomas Jefferson~
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
E
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
E
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
Originally Posted by IndyCA35
In 1865 the Congress passed the 13th amendment outlawing slavery. Lincoln met with Alexander Stephens, the VP of the Confederacy, and suggested the South come back into the union befause it toolk 3/4 of the states to ratify trhe amendment.
I’ve read there were back n forth conversations

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,156
D
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,156
Originally Posted by rainshot
People are not "Property". Slaves were forbidden to be educated. Some were taught only a single job like blacksmithing or cooking and cleaning. They were forbidden to own any property. They were chattel and only that. They were fed with food they largely grew and clothed as the owner saw fit. housed as well. They were forbidden to marry. As property their women could be taken at the owners discretion and bred. Reconstruction was a nightmare for the South thanks to Booth's success. It took many years to overcome the hatred, animosity and superstitions some of which exist today. The democrat party today is just as viral as it was in the "solid south". Instead of murdering blacks and denying them any rights they imprison them in other ways. They have managed to keep many blacks on the plantation by convincing them that democrats alone are their salvation. That's changing largely because of Trump.
The question wasn't about the morality of slavery. It was about whether one (or more) states could ignore the constitution, to the detriment of other states. If it were solely about slavery, the abolitionists should have gladly let the immoral southerners leave.

(Unfortunately, the side that didn't care what the constitution said won, and we now have the all powerful federal govt.)

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
E
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
E
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
Delaware wuz a slave state

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,150
P
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,150
Originally Posted by 99guy
And Mr. Lincoln did take many liberties with the Constitution, suspending Habeus Corpus, crushing the draft rebellion in NYC and the Emancipation Proclamation amongst other constitutional indiscretions. Where does it say in the Constitution that the President of the United States can issue "Proclamations", that then become the immediate law of the land? King Abe?

Was it morally justified? Of course. Was it a direct violation of the Constitution? Yes. Lincoln had no constitutional authority to free the slaves with the stroke of a pen. He was guilty of defending the constitution and interpreting the constitution as it suited his agenda. History has given him a pass because the outcome suited history and the victors.


This is pretty much all that needs to be said.




P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
E
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
E
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Originally Posted by 99guy
And Mr. Lincoln did take many liberties with the Constitution, suspending Habeus Corpus, crushing the draft rebellion in NYC and the Emancipation Proclamation amongst other constitutional indiscretions. Where does it say in the Constitution that the President of the United States can issue "Proclamations", that then become the immediate law of the land? King Abe?

Was it morally justified? Of course. Was it a direct violation of the Constitution? Yes. Lincoln had no constitutional authority to free the slaves with the stroke of a pen. He was guilty of defending the constitution and interpreting the constitution as it suited his agenda. History has given him a pass because the outcome suited history and the victors.


This is pretty much all that needs to be said.




P
Yes

IC B3

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,349
J
Campfire Kahuna
Online Happy
Campfire Kahuna
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,349
Those gall darned native Americans should just get over it!

Them Indians lost....time to move on!


Oh......nevermind.


I am MAGA.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,150
P
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,150
Oh, and about being called a Yankee…I get a kick out of it.

Like being called a cracker. Hilarious.




P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,672
B
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,672
Originally Posted by 7mmbuster
This looks interesting.
John Wilkes Booth
Not a fan of Lincoln. I hold him highly responsible for the Civil War, which I believe could have been avoided with a more even handed approach to the problem of succession.
Instead of attempting a peaceful solution, Lincoln called out 75000 militia to put down an armed rebellion.
He skillfully painted the South into a corner, forcing them to fire the first shots and appear in the north and abroad as the aggressors.
With that said, I still think that Booths shot in Fords Theater, was the single most destructive shot fired against the Confederacy in the war.
With Lincoln gone, the last moderating influence to the black republicans was removed as well.
With the vindictive feeling of the northern population, and with a weak executive like Andrew Johnson in the White House, they enforced a strict and damaging policy of reconstruction on the South.
It caused years of depression and even longer feelings of hatred in the southern states.
I think the whole damn thing could have been avoided…
Reon

What in the heck is the “problem of succession”?


The way life should be.
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 624
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 624
All very interesting. Until you remember Article VI Sec II of the Constitution, which is often referred to as the Supremacy Clause which states: when State law and Federal Law come into conflict, Federal Law prevails. So the Union viewed the Constitution as a binding contract, which Art.VI made it. The Confederate States viewed it as a "gentleman's agreement" that could be dissolved when one part felt wronged by the other. The rub to the Southern argument was that Art.VI was in the Constitution when their representatives signed it or when they were admitted to the Union. So clearly the South was in the wrong for secession and the firing upon Fort Sumpter. Regardless of what your unreconstructed Great Great Great Grand Pappy says.


bkraft

"Four things greater than all things are, Women and Horses and Power and War."
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,324
P
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,324
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by pabucktail
Originally Posted by JoeBob
I really think that according the logic of Rhod some states are missing a golden opportunity to get rich. All we have to do is pass a law that all personal property that makes it to the state from an owner who lives in another state, no longer belongs to said owner. We confiscate it, or as I prefer to say, “set it free”. We then sell it and split the proceeds. It’s full proof since it would be a great injustice to expect a state to honor the property rights of persons in another state.


Your message is half-gibberish, but perhaps you fail to grasp the part of the issue where the "property" referenced were human beings rather than escaped livestock or purloined equipment? Since it involved human beings, a large portion of country stood opposed to slavery, didn't want to go along with it, and were happy to see it fail. Perhaps we could draw an analogy with abortion in our own time? And no, northerners weren't selling slaves and "splitting the proceeds" with anyone. Also, northerners who failed to go along with slavery program in their own states nullified those laws by not following them, to the point of in some cases arresting federal marshals who attempted to enforce the law. Again, perhaps we could draw an example from our own time of a state standing in opposition to the federal government in regards to illegal aliens....Texas perhaps?
.

Oh, so now you’re in favor of the Doctrine of Nullification. Would that the northern states had been in your camp in the 1830s and the Civil War may have been avoided.

But here is what I understand and you don’t. Slaves were by the law and by the Constitution agreed upon by all parties, just that, property. Your morality doesn’t enter into the law. You don’t get to decide for yourself what laws you will enforce and what ones you won’t because morality is subjective. The Constitution was a contract, agreed to and relied upon by the states. And your side decided it no longer liked the terms. Sp instead of agreeing to dissolve the contract and let the parties depart, you decided to change the terms by force of arms and force the other side to stay and abide by the new terms against its will.

And if we are going to draw analogies, yes, let’s use illegal immigration, but instead of your bullschit, let’s use reality. The reality is that the federal government is refusing to enforce the constitution and protect states against invasion, just like it refused to uphold property rights back then. And just like back then, certain states style themselves as sanctuaries and encourage and actively engage in the subversion of the lawto the detriment of those states wishing to see immigration laws enforced. The sanctuary states decry other states as mean spirited and racist and everything but Christian JUST LIKE THEY DID THEN.

You know when Southerners finally had enough and decided to leave back then, you Yankees should have been happy about it. With the South gone, your states would have been slave free and you would have had no obligation to enforce or ignore regarding fugitive slaves.

Sir, we’re just having a discussion amongst friends here, I hope your blood pressure stays reasonable.

I understand the “property” ruling. I also understand some states decided not to go along with it because they didn’t wish to partake or abet human slavery. There was a war over this great national sin. Slavery was ended. That’s a good thing.

Our federal power’s theory goes from one end of the spectrum to other in the last several elections. Sanctuary cities during the Trump administration seemed pretty confederate-y to me.

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,061
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,061
Originally Posted by bkraft
All very interesting. Until you remember Article VI Sec II of the Constitution, which is often referred to as the Supremacy Clause which states: when State law and Federal Law come into conflict, Federal Law prevails. So the Union viewed the Constitution as a binding contract, which Art.VI made it. The Confederate States viewed it as a "gentleman's agreement" that could be dissolved when one part felt wronged by the other. The rub to the Southern argument was that Art.VI was in the Constitution when their representatives signed it or when they were admitted to the Union. So clearly the South was in the wrong for secession and the firing upon Fort Sumpter. Regardless of what your unreconstructed Great Great Great Grand Pappy says.
Maybe read Article 6 again and see if your interpretation that "the south was wrong" might be itself wrong. Of course I realize that military victory vindicates the north even if they were wrong legally. That's just the way it is.


Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you."
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 438
R
Campfire Member
Online Content
Campfire Member
R
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by bluefish
Originally Posted by 7mmbuster
This looks interesting.
John Wilkes Booth
Not a fan of Lincoln. I hold him highly responsible for the Civil War, which I believe could have been avoided with a more even handed approach to the problem of succession.
Instead of attempting a peaceful solution, Lincoln called out 75000 militia to put down an armed rebellion.
He skillfully painted the South into a corner, forcing them to fire the first shots and appear in the north and abroad as the aggressors.
With that said, I still think that Booths shot in Fords Theater, was the single most destructive shot fired against the Confederacy in the war.
With Lincoln gone, the last moderating influence to the black republicans was removed as well.
With the vindictive feeling of the northern population, and with a weak executive like Andrew Johnson in the White House, they enforced a strict and damaging policy of reconstruction on the South.
It caused years of depression and even longer feelings of hatred in the southern states.
I think the whole damn thing could have been avoided…
Reon

What in the heck is the “problem of succession”?

Yeah, it was a pretty good show.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,783
W
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
W
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 60,783
"But you fought all the way Johney Reb,"


These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o
"May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
E
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
E
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,485
Originally Posted by wabigoon
"But you fought all the way Johney Reb,"
Yes we did wabi

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,327
9
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
9
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,327
There were plenty of good guys and bad guys on both sides of the Mason Dixon Line then and not much has changed since then.

A lot of people on both sides died in that war that didn't need to. They had no stake or nothing to gain by the outcome but wound up dead anyhow. A terrible outcome for them and their families. The war started over the issue of slavery. The boys that fought and died on both sides mostly didn't give a damn about slavery one way or the other. They were conscripted, baited by a sense of adventure or patriotism or in the Souths case, invaded by a foreign army. I feel sorry for the boys and the families and many of those stories have been passed down through the generations and are still open wounds till this day.

A terrible chapter of American history.


"You cannot invade mainland America. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass"
~Admiral Yamamoto~

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. ~Thomas Jefferson~
Page 6 of 31 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 30 31

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

566 members (1936M71, 12savage, 1lessdog, 16penny, 01Foreman400, 160user, 57 invisible), 2,537 guests, and 1,271 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,679
Posts18,474,956
Members73,941
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.117s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9253 MB (Peak: 1.1075 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-28 18:30:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS