24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
I know that the 85grain TSX in .243 at ~3200 doesn't lack for smack or penetration in the least. I bought a 25-06 when Barnes released the 80 grain TTSX just because that ought to be just one hell of a Bambi whacker. Now Barnes releases the TSX in a flat base .277 version that weighs 85 grains!

It doesn't get a whole lot better. I loaded TTSX 130's for a few guns last fall and they accounted for 6 one shot go nowhere kills, no misses. Out of an '06 at ~3150, or out of a .308 at ~2900 they were very accurate and we recovered no bullets. I couldn't bring myself to shoot one with the 300 WM and the 130s even though they were very accurate at ~3480 so I used a 150 Barnes on one out of it.

When I started loading back in the fifties we didn't have a lot of good bullets. We didn't have a lot of accurate bullets. We didn't have a lot of bullets that held together well at speed. Now, we have bullets that are very accurate, hold together unbelievably well at speed and even in very light weights have high enough BCs not to shed velocity at reasonable ranges. I don't know about the rest of you, but I am really looking forward to what a little competition among the bullet makers will do in the next few years.

GB1

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,090
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,090
Magnumb.....I too have been toying with the Barnes TSX bullets in the 100 grn weight! I must say they shoot very very well downrange onto our targets that were set up at 100 & 200 yards.

I am keeping my fingers crossed for one of he .338 calibers in the vault in 225 bullet weight. Also have a .300Ultra mag to work up loads for in the near future. I am impressed with the fact these bullets seem to not have a problem opeining up like past Barnes X or XLC bullets did a few years back.

I have been able to shoot .650 MOA at 100 yards off the bench with the one 25-06 caliber model 70 Winchester hunting rifle. The bigger test will be the Ruger model 77 with bull barrel in a 25-06 also. Hope all goes well.

Now Mr. Jordan Smith....YOU send me a PM and I'll get you some of those bullets Canuck!!!


Thank Our Veterans!
GOD Bless Them All

UNIONS BUILDING AMERICA, SALUTE ALL THE UNION TRADESMAN

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
M
magnumb Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
........and what metals they'll be usin'!!

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
M
magnumb Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
NRA - welcome to the 'Fire'...........BTW!!

FWIW - I found that I get +2.5 in. @ 100 yards, a hair over +3.0 inches at 200 and dead-on ZERO at 300 yards with the 25-06 movin' at the velocities I mentioned earlier (that .397 BC is impressive). My 'sight-height' is 1.7 (with this particular rifle/scope set-up whereas 1.5 in. is much more often the case), so that needs to be considered as well when runnin' the ballistics. This arrangement never took my trajectory higher than +3.5 in. at any range, which is what I personally shoot for.....pun intended. I proof all program ballistics of each cartridge I load for as it is the only way to either confirm their calculations or to discover discrepancies....IMHO. Not always do they stack up exactly spot-on, but with this particular load/cartridge, it came out as close to spot-on as any I've ever run in regards to what was to be expected.

I also shoot and load for a 300RUM and have done so since first introduced. I'm currently shooting 200gr. NP's, but will eventually move to either the 180gr. TSX's or TTSX's (I'LL see if one shoots better than the other). MY 300WSM's both shoot the 180gr. TSX's very well and since they hit the market, a couple elk have hit the deck. They flat out work! I've no isses with the current 200gr. NP's, but figure that I might as well load 'down' for this cartridge as well given the consistently higher retained weight factor of the TTSX's/TSX's.

IMHO, RL25 is the ticket for the very effective and accurate 300RUM cartridge..............grin.

Last edited by magnumb; 04/02/09.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,141
Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,141
Likes: 4

They shoot well out of my 25-06 too. I don't know why I care but it seems that they should make this bullet in an 85-grain weight for the 25s.

IC B2

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,044
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,044
I use this bullet in my 25 STW and it puts elk down in a hurry . Great bullet for the 25-06 if your rifle will shoot them. In my 25-06 i use the Nosler 100 gr BT and the 110 gr Accubond with Rel 22 both shoot around 1/2 inch from my rifle.


A Doe walks out of the woods today and says, that is the last time I'm going to do that for Two Bucks.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 39
M
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
M
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 39
They do make a 25cal ttsx check out midway or barnes website

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,395
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,395
I'm going to try the TTSX in my 257Roberts this year. The TSX works extremely well already.

The 130TTSX in my 300WM was incredibly efficient on 2 SE Whitetails at 3,500fps this season.:) Oh yeah...They also group .5 MOA or better out of a 13 year old factory tube:)

The 210TTSX's out of my 338-06 don't group as well at 2,650fps....But they did the job nonetheless:)

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


Robert

Last edited by Bruzer; 04/08/09.

Bruz
"You can't scare me.........I have kids"


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,757
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,757
Originally Posted by magnumb
There are others here working with this new Barnes offering as well. I said earlier that I'd report back as to my findings/results. Well, I just finished load development on my Sako 75 using the new 100gr. TTSX's. I'm usin' RL22, Fed. 210M's and Fed. brass (unfortunately, had a bunch left over). Very soft brass and I might get 3 loads!!

I'm typically getting 1/2 groups when I'm staked down, up to almost 3/4 in. when I get a bit sloppy (to include a bit of wind). They chrono'd out yesterday at a MV of 3,417 fps. (20 rounds chrono'd an avg. of 3,398 fps, chrono set out at 20ft.)

At +2.5 inches at 100 yards, I'm zero'd at 300 yds. with a max-height trajectory of +3.4 inches......just the parameters I've set for my own uses.

A super easy, comfortable load to shoot, extremely accurate, seating depths didn't seem to make any difference from close up to a bit past what Barnes recommends.

I thought my 110gr. AB load was accurate, but this TTSX load leaves very little, if anything, to be desired. 'Course, the proofs in the pudding, as they say.

I'm most interested in any others results as well......thanks.

Next up - the new 130gr. TTSX's for my new 270WSM.
How many grns of RL22?

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

532 members (1Longbow, 22250rem, 1badf350, 160user, 10Glocks, 219 Wasp, 48 invisible), 2,160 guests, and 1,199 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,234
Posts18,504,419
Members73,994
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.076s Queries: 33 (0.011s) Memory: 0.8447 MB (Peak: 0.9161 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-11 14:46:52 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS