|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,742
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,742 |
I like both rounds and either would work on elk with the right bullet. However, I'd pick the .270Win. if I had to use the .275R in a Weatherby rifle. I just haven't been able to make peace with the Weatherby style stock.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,860
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,860 |
I own both, and would lean to the 270 just for a slightly heavier slug.
1Minute
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
For elk I would choose the .270 Win every time. With 150g bullets.
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,248
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,248 |
Killed a pile of elk with the 270 and 150 grainers......
Casey
Casey
Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 668
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 668 |
In this comparison I favor the 270 with 150 or 160 NP's for critters in elk size hides.
Last edited by Gone_Huntin; 02/02/10.
NRA Patron Member.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197 |
![[Linked Image]](http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp311/patrickgsinclair/scan0064.jpg) Taken with a .257 Weatherby at 385 yards...120gr partition. ![[Linked Image]](http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp311/patrickgsinclair/scan0049-3.jpg) This one was taken with a .270 at 225 yards...130gr partition. Either will work fine if you place your shots well...
Luck....is the residue of design... ![[Linked Image]](http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp311/patrickgsinclair/96zvyt.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277 |
Nice pics Pat! 4 some reason or another the first bull (and I love that bull by the way) looks like it fell in less than an elk packing friendly spot...  Dober
"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,925
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,925 |
Either will work fine if you place your shots well...
I agree with that statement... but I am a diehard 270 fan. So I would choose a 270. In reality, my 338-06 would probably get the nod.
Arcus Venator
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943 |
.270...now compare throw in the .270 Wby, 150 grain NPs, and have at it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,162
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,162 |
Both will do the job, but I personally would choose... neither.
In my book, bigger critters deserve bigger bullets. To paraphrase the Keithian hypothesis, with some Capstick topspin, if you're fixin' to put a hole in something, make it a hole to remember.
If you're fixin' to put a hole in something,
make it a hole to remember.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,943 |
True confessions - my preferred elk rifles all begin with "3", and my favorite with "33".
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 33
Campfire Greenhorn
|
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 33 |
6.5 x284 is more then just a great paper puncher its a great hunting cailber.
robert koch
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,019
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,019 |
I really like both; however, if I had to choose just one it would be the 270 Win because it will handle heavier projectiles if needed.
Lou
************************
NRA Benefactor member
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,809
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,809 |
Own them both, love them both but if elk were on the menu, I would be carrying the bigger bullet...
having said that, my 300 wsm would be preferable.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,209
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,209 |
what is the gun used for? the two are both proven elk killers. if it was gonna be a open country speed goat and dog zapper I would lean to the 257 if you were gonna just hunt elk I would think 270. having used both with equal results I would just grab one and go.
ps, my 257 killed elk died to the trauma from a 100gr tsx tearing through (yes through) at 350 odd yds. I have the utmost confidence in them because I shoot it a bunch.
that last line^^^^^is more important then the difference of the thickness of a piece of paper between two bullets.
I would not buy something that runs on any kind of primer given the possibility of primer shortages and even regulations. In fact, why not buy a flintlock? Really. Rocks aren't going away anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,506
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,506 |
270 win and 150gr partitions.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,119
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,119 |
Amazing what a difference 1/50th of an inch and 2% of an ounce in bullet weight can (theoretically) make.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,506
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,506 |
mule deer - heck, almost every argument/opinion one reads here is "theoretical", don't you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,119
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,119 |
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,713
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,713 |
I can't believe this made it into the elk forum. Everyone knows that a .270 Win will just pencil in without expanding and a .257 Roy will disintegrate before it gets through the armored skin... You can only kill elk with 7mm and larger bullets or they don't bleed.
...new laws were most numerous when the commonwealth was most corrupt. ~ Publius Cornelius Tacitus
|
|
|
|
|
301 members (2ndwind, 257_X_50, 1_deuce, 10gaugemag, 2500HD, 34 invisible),
2,280
guests, and
1,168
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,862
Posts18,478,591
Members73,948
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
