|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,213 Likes: 26
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,213 Likes: 26 |
Why not indeed?
One of the reasons there are so many more bullets over 250 grains available for 9.3's is that for a long, long time the standard rate of twist for .35's was 1-16, which won't reliably stabilize spitzers over 250 grains.
But if a .35 has a faster twist (and my own .358 Norma has a 1-14) then heavier bullets can certainly be used. Mine shoots well with both the 280-grain Swift A-Frame and 310-grain Woodleigh.
The other answer, of course, is that, like Mount Everest, the 9.3's are there.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,059
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,059 |
$2000 for the ever popular 370 sako mag with an attractive hard red rubber shoulder bumper, or $900 for a new FN model 70EW in 338WM that are reported to shoot bug holes...let me ponder that one for a moment... Or how about a 375 Ruger for $800? Them Alaskans can't be all wrong....... Pete
There is nothing made by man, which cannot be broken by woman.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,324
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,324 |
I have a 370 Sako, also have a 35Whelen as well, the 9.3 hits soft at one end and hard at the other. Does one kill any better than the other, killed over 20 moose , some bears and deer with the 35 and it works really well, only one moose and one deer with the 370/9.3x66. At 220yds and a 250gr AccuBond went through a pre-rut bull moose's paunch and on out the other side, he took not one step. The 35 with 250's probably would have done the same thing but I run these 250's at 2700fps.
|
|
|
|
545 members (2500HD, 219 Wasp, 1lessdog, 1minute, 257robertsimp, 53 invisible),
2,424
guests, and
1,355
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,897
Posts18,518,402
Members74,020
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|