Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Watched Cain on Fox

LOL! Classic!

Your support for the list of complete idiots running for Pres on the GOP side is the real sign of a fool and his thoughts. Lets see... Palin (Here is a winner) Bachmann (Palin light), Perrry ( the best debater of all). Cain (999 and no clue) and your stuck with a candidate you really hate (Mitt)! Maybe you can work on Christie some more! Hell Christie was smart enough to stay out of this Sh&t Storm and hope for smoother sailing in 2016. 2012 is going to be a wash guys. If Obama wins you are going to be really pissed off, if Mitt wins you're going to be really pissed off. I call that a Win!

When Obama is out,the entire country wins, save for freeloaders such as yourself,of course. The thought of having to work for a living terrifies you,doesn't it?

On that subject,post a pic of you working your trade in Alaska,if one exists. I think it will be easy to expose you for the pathological liar and fraud you really are.

Damned right. Been saying the same myself.

Can you imagine what might happen if RP became viable enough to require any of the others to spend some money addressing his failings rather than letting RP do it all by himself,for free?

Cain's a numbskull banker shill. Romney's a first class RINO. Perry's another George Dubya. Gingrich is Mr. Global Warming. Only Ron Paul is right on all the issues, and with him there's no surprises. He's been fighting for the same issues, like a voice in the wilderness, since the 1970s, i.e., the very issues that all the phonies have suddenly started running on only of late, because only recently, since the course of events have proved that Ron Paul was right all along, they're popular.

Your right! Just send me that cheese!

You are such a dip stick! 50% of the guys on the forum know the GOP is screwed with the clowns you have to run with in 2012. Just today there has been many posts that are saying how low the GOP has sunk or how all the candidates are so bad. I think that any of the good ones have bowed out because the Right Wing of the party which really represents maybe 10-12% of the party have turned a deaf ear to any sensible candidate. The GOP has some good choices out there but guys like you are demanding that each new flavor of the day be more crazy than the other and you are getting what you have asked for.


Good luck with that. Most of the country and many here on the campfire reside some where closer to the middle than the vocal few like yourself. Its like you guys insist that if you piss in a wind storm that you will not get anything on yourself. As most of us can see your all wet and you smell like PEE!

Let's see the pics,fraud.

First you beg for Hugo Chavez's oil, now begging for cheese. Pathetic

I agree with you. I think RP is the only one with any morals. You know where he stands and that scares the hell out of the Right Wing and the establishment. Cant control this guy!

I don't think he can with the primary but I still like him!

I musta missed that as I don't recall any of them other than RP calling the end or even audit of the Fed; at least they sure don't bring that up. Cain even said he would expand the military. Don't any but RP call out for WS and Corps to step and come clean. These are issues that are outside and out of bounds for both parties. They are owned.

Then you musta missed a lot�

A PROSPERITY PLAN: REFORMING THE FEDERAL RESERVE
I will also include in jobs and prosperity legislation provisions to reform the Federal Reserve.
They will include a full-scale audit of Federal Reserve activities as well as a narrowing of the Fed's statutory mandate.
The amount of money Chairman Bernanke has allocated in secrecy is incompatible with a free society.
Every decision document and meeting record for 2008 to 2010 should be made public and audited.
We the people deserve to know how our money is spent.

The Fed's monetary policy discretion should be limited to following a price rule guiding the conduct of monetary policy.
The Fed should monitor the signals provided by sensitive commodity prices with the goal of maintaining stable prices, thereby contributing to a stable dollar without inflation.

The operations of the Federal Reserve have an extraordinary impact over our everyday lives.
The Fed influences how much money is circulating in the economy, the value of the dollar, and what we pay to borrow from banks in the form of interest rates.
Since the enactment of legislation in 1978 known as the Humphrey-Hawkins Act, the Fed has had a dual mandate: maximum employment and stable prices.
These two goals are incompatible.
Newt Gingrich

Too many are willing to vote for douchebag-light just to get rid of douchebag. They'd rather vote for someone they think will be the winner (even if it is because he has powerful financial backing from some special interest group), rather than vote for a man w/ good intentions who can help us out of this.

In terms of legislative achievement Gingrich is light-years ahead of Ron Paul.
The 21st Century Contract with America in substance and detail is light-years ahead of Ron Paul.

Finally, the bureaucratic rules and procedures that are commonplace in the federal government have no place in the twenty-first century. This legislation must dramatically overhaul the entire structure of the federal civil service, and make it clear that Americans will only tolerate a government that aggressively targets and eliminates waste and fraud, and incorporates private-sector best practices. Strong America Now, an organization dedicated to bringing modern management to government at every level, estimates that we can save $500 billion a year in spending through proven waste-cutting and value-enhancing techniques from the private sector, such as Lean Six Sigma.

The Defense Department has already used Lean Six Sigma to save more than $22 billion, increasing productivity 1,000 percent in some facilities.

IBM's Business of Government consultancy makes a more conservative estimate, suggesting that the federal government could save $100 billion annually by implementing commercial best practices. Using fraud detection techniques similar to those employed by credit card companies, we could save between $70 and $120 billion a year in Medicaid and Medicare fraud, according to the Center for Health Transformation.
Newt Gingrich

Then why Did Paul Ryun say he believed Romney would over-turn Obamacare. I think Ryun has a better take on Romney on this issue than anyone here.

The same Paul Ryan who voted for TARP against the expressed will of the overwhelming majority of his constituents?

It will be interesting to see if Cain can continue to maintain his lead in the polls.

Whether he actually did anything wrong in the 90's appears to be irrelevant now, the bigger story is how he keeps changing his.

If someone is a hard core Cain supporter it won't change anything, but just like Perry - Cain has now faced the scrutiny of front runner.

Perhaps Romney's plan all along was to always be the guy in second right up to the end so the media and party backstabbing will clear out the contenders.

I see that as well.

I'm afraid we'll keep going down this path until we hit a Greece situation where no matter who is in charge, he(or she) will have limited options and have to make some hard decisions that nobody wants. Then everyone will turn against him and those goofy hippie protestors that we kind of look at in strange bemusement now will be real citizens in the street demanding a continuation of services and support that our government can no longer provide.

If you can see that as a reality, then I would hope someone would consider Ron Paul because severe cuts in the government we can negotiate and rationalize are much better when there is time to act on it rather than when they have to happen and its too late.

Either way, I firmly believe they are coming, and any candidate that is still proposing a format of big government (based on spending, taxes or a combination of both) may appeal to a large segment but doesn't really have the long term interest of the country in mind.


We already face another rating downgrade when the cuts from the committee that are mandated kick in because our partisan government refuses to find common ground on what needs to happen.

While I certainly believe there is a rational argument as to whether Ron Paul could actually get the significant reduction in size and scope of government he seeks, I don't think there is any argument that doing so puts America on much, much firmer financial ground and in turn gives it the ability to spend money on what are its biggest priorities.

For example, some people believe that Ron Paul's foreign policy will weaken our military and world dominance, however how can we continue to have a military as strong as we do now when both parties and every leading candidate agrees that significant cuts in military spending have to happen? You don't hear Ron Paul talking about not spending to build ships, tanks, weapons, VA hospitals, etc - you hear him talking about minimizing our "empire" overseas (I'm sure he has had examples of wasteful military spending but I'm talking in generalities here).

Whether a republican or democrat gets elected they are going to cut the military budget. Its already being cut to the tune of $400 billion over a period of time in the near future. Its being floated that another $400 billion is realistic.

It's because we have to do it and someone is going to have to make some hard decisions about what is valuable and what isn't.

I'd rather be in the position of believing the US had the financial means to where if we had to spend the money on something we could, without printing it and having China float us a loan.

That is a big driver why I support Ron Paul.

I just don't hear other candidates preaching a philosophy of realistic financial independence.

That is interesting.
I hope there is something to that, as I would like to see Cain keep campaigning...

Repealing ObamaCare seems to be at the top of Romney's list.