|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
A VXI is just a renamed old Vari-X-II, and the brand new model is even better, with new coatings and click adjustments. The Vari-X-II was no slouch.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,658
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,658 |
Leupold has, right on their site, 2 free CDS dials with the purchase of a CDS scope.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,474
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,474 |
I remember when I bought my first VX3, I thought I had really arrived in the optics world. Then I shot it side by side with my VX1's, and felt like a sucker. You can certainly speak for yourself, but hunting and shooting here in the NW on a dark evening or early morning there is a very distinct difference between the VX3 compared to the VX2 or VX1. The VX3 has far better glass.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,326 Likes: 9
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,326 Likes: 9 |
I certainly wouldn't waste good money on a Rifleman or a VXI. I had a Vari X III on a Ruger 7mag forever and killed lots of stuff at dusk thirty. JG, The VX-I is the previous Vari-X II's. The latest VX-1's are the previous VX-II. The new VX-1's even have the click adjustments now. In other words, the VX-II's--street price of $299, have become the VX-1's, with a street price of $230. In my opinion (based on a sample of one VX-1 3-9), the VX-1's are a heck'uva bang for the buck. My serious (lightweight) huntin' rifles all have 2.5-8's on them. And my 55 year old eyes have to work at it to find much diff between my vari-X III's, VX-III, and VX-3. Maybe other magnifications have more discernable differences..... Casey
Casey
Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively... Having said that, MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
I certainly wouldn't waste good money on a Rifleman or a VXI. I had a Vari X III on a Ruger 7mag forever and killed lots of stuff at dusk thirty. JG, The VX-I is the previous Vari-X II's. The latest VX-1's are the previous VX-II. The new VX-1's even have the click adjustments now. In other words, the VX-II's--street price of $299, have become the VX-1's, with a street price of $230. That is my understanding as well. Hell, I have made shots right at dark with an older 1992 Vari-x-II. Certainly the brand new VX-1's with MC-4 coatings are better. I just ordered one. Going to send it in for an M1. On this particular gun, weight was the deciding factor. My favorite scopes I own are my Docters, but they are 19oz, so not really a good fit on a mtn type rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,000
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,000 |
Here's a link I found on Leupold's website explaining the differences in scope lines. http://www.leupold.com/hunting-and-shooting/resources/faq/#WhatAreTheMajorGranted, based on the info already posted, looks like things changed for 2012 and Leupold still hasn't updated their website.
He went over yonder way
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,691
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,691 |
The Meopta, Kahles, and Doctor surely should be better, as they sell for two plus times to three plus times more than a new VX-2 retails for. No deep discounts, but I have a shop where I usually get at least enough discount to cover the tax. jack
"Do not blame Caesar, blame the people...who have...rejoiced in their loss of freedom....Blame the people who hail him when he speaks of the 'new, wonderful, good, society'...to mean ,..living fatly at the expense of the industrious." Cicero
|
|
|
|
536 members (12344mag, 01Foreman400, 222Sako, 1lessdog, 1beaver_shooter, 1badf350, 63 invisible),
1,743
guests, and
1,236
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,124
Posts18,522,983
Members74,026
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|