Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Straight Poop on Masons..?

I fixed it for you.

We had our December meeting last night.

As our lodge is very modern we opened up several PC's and all the brethren looked this long thread over.

Plenty of laughs were had.

Thanks for the entertainment. Keep reading as much as you can on the WWW

Haven't reached the Luciferian level yet??

Perhaps, it is because of their Luciferian status they saw the humor.

Well I've had a chance to join the Masons and I've studied Washington who was a Mason and this is some of the conclusions I've come to.

My Deist tendency would fit the Masons real well but my anarchist nature would not.

I'm a mystic and that too would fit the Masons real well but again my anarchist nature would not.

So I turned down membership which would be best for the Masons.

Because of the mysticism and Deist tendency of the Masons I can see why so many Christians would have a hissy fit with Masons.

The local temple has a Passion play every Easter which is about as Christian as one could get.

A mark to the world perhaps, but who is to judge the existence and efficacy of such a transformation, without knowledge of where that person truly was in their sin and where they were headed in the future? No one but God. Jesus did not remove sin from the world or it's attraction to our flesh with His sacrifice. He offered a propitiation for the results of sin that disarmed sin's death penalty for those who would believe.

For the Believer, there is one sin that leads to death, that being the blaspheming of the Holy Spirit. I don't believe that sin possible for Believers, though some may.

Mankind, including Belivers, will never be transformed from it's proclivity toward sinful ways until the corruptible is made incorruptible. That does not occur with salvation but after physical death or a rapture.

None of that means we should continue in sin. But sin is inevitable in every persons life. There is none good. And all sin bears the same penalty, thus ones winked at "minor sin" is on equal footing with another's pet "terrible sin".

If you like your salvation, you can keep your salvation. Period. Even if you decide, or live as though you appear not to like it, you're still stuck with it. That is the power of His Sacrifice and the Faithfulness of God.

YMMV and this is the last such post I will make on this thread so as not to hijack it further for those so inclined.

You are doing well, I haven't even had an offer!

...and we do not have a lodge in town, but Longreach has a bloody great big thumping white edifice that I played around when I was a Lad, just in front of the RSL...we had the takeaway next door.

They must have been desperate when they offered me a membership.

That's a pretty nice looking temple.

You know maybe that's why the Mormons are hated by Christians too as the Mormons have temples that only the chosen few can enter and Mormonism is a secret society as well.

Does it end with the crucifixion or with the resurrection?

The comparison was made due to the 33 in the German symbal, this is from the video that is supposed to be all damming eidence of Free Masonry.
And BTW, I never have and never will worhsip the devil, and there is more than one book on our alter, above which hangs a symbol of which i will I will not even bother to tell you about because you will draw your ow far flung conclusions about.
Goodbye to you Sir , and may God be with you as he is with me.....
Cat

Good question I don't know. I've never seen the play itself I've just been shown the tapestry they use for the play and had it explained to me. Next time I run into one of the Masons I know I'll have to try and remember to ask them.

Now THAT is something I haven't seen from cat before...almost like catching Brian swearing.

Your funny......keep surfing the net

Yeah.

Jayne was one of my favorite characters on the show. And that was one of my favorite shows ever. Still miss seeing it on TV.

Will

Do you have all 14 episodes and the movie?

It's 4 AM in Adelaide.

BTW, Masonry <> scouting

Criticizing the use of the internet in this day and age is about as compelling as criticizing the use of the library circa 1970. Instead of focusing your criticism on the mechanism through which facts and arguments are accessed, you'd enjoy more credibility if you focused on rational refutations of those facts and arguments.

Are you in South oz?