It's beyond my ability, but that doesn't mean it's beyond everyone's ability.
I've seen an acquaintance shoot static targets at 100-110 yards that I'd be challenged to hit as well at 60. He uses a much more specialized setup than I do, is a way better shooter, and shoots A LOT.
I'd not argue the ethics of his effective range based on my own.
"Your range of experience runs that gamut from A to B, plus you're a nitwit. That's a hard combination to overcome, though some people try." - JB
I don't know how much this guy shoots a bow, but I have seen video of Michael Waddell shooting at 100 yards that would make most archers envious...
Shrap, taking nothing from MW but Tim Wells is probably one of the finest shots with a bow ever. He apparently takes flying duck and geese and running game from rabbits to sable with a bow.
I think most archers would enjoy MOST of his shows called Relentless Pursuit.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time by the blood of patriots and tyrants.
If being stupid allows me to believe in Him, I'd wish to be a retard. Eisenhower and G Washington should be good company.
I agree with most other posters. A 95 yard shot is more about the shooter than showing respect for the game. Way too many variables that can go wrong, which are beyond the shooter's control and impossible to predict. It's an ego stroke when everything goes right, but I'd wager a pretty penny that it goes wrong a whole lot more often. I have too much respect for the animals I hunt to roll those dice.
I hit a gopher at over 60 yards on my second shot once.
As I am a serial harvester of unseen twigs at less than have that range, not to mention having to dope the range and wind, I ain't gonna try it. Plus the deer can move quite a bit in the time the arrow is in the air.
I don't know how much this guy shoots a bow, but I have seen video of Michael Waddell shooting at 100 yards that would make most archers envious...
Having the ability to hit something at 100 yards is only a fraction of the equation. A lot of time passes between the time the arrow is released and it reaches the 100 yard mark. During that time, the hunter has absolutely zero control over what takes place. That's a gamble; pure and simple. Anyone who claims otherwise is not being honest with himself.
I don't know how much this guy shoots a bow, but I have seen video of Michael Waddell shooting at 100 yards that would make most archers envious...
Shrap, taking nothing from MW but Tim Wells is probably one of the finest shots with a bow ever. He apparently takes flying duck and geese and running game from rabbits to sable with a bow.
I think most archers would enjoy MOST of his shows called Relentless Pursuit.
Is he the young bearded guy that shoots everything from balloons to remote controlled cars???
Had a very well-known archer/magazine editor/writer on a Kodiak deer hunt a number of years ago. Each day he brought back video of deer missed, maimed, or otherwise mistreated. I want to say they had video of wounding and losing deer at 85 yards and significantly closer, at least several. They had 5 tags and finally killed one on video at 55 yards (IIRC) but it was not usable video with a nasty gut shot.
He was one of the best pure shooters I have ever seen...
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.