Home
Posted By: mirage243 Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
This is gonna be ugly I'm sure, hope casualty's are kept to a minimum.
At least it was middle of the night. Barge hit an I-40 bridge over the Arkansas River near here around 8AM that caused it to collapse and kill most of the people on it several years ago.
Posted By: rong Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Just seen the video on the news.
They are saying maybe up to 20 people missing,drivers as well as some construction workers.
Looks likes a long bridge ,major impact on travel.
Posted By: jimone Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Will this close the port for long period?
Originally Posted by jimone
Will this close the port for long period?

It might, this is a really big deal. I don't know about Annapolis or whatever Navy presence in the area might be effected. Locking the Navy into their port could really upset the defense of the east coast, too. This is a big deal.
Posted By: 10Glocks Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Wow, hoping for the best for the workers on the bridge. You can see maintance vehicle with their flashing lights on stopped on that bridge, and all of them went into the water.

As far as traffic, that's a major bridge that carries Interstate 695. Traffic is going to be super-fugged for a long time to come.



As far as blocking in the Navy, that's not an issue. There may be some USNS ships in that harbor for repair or for taking on fuel. But the bulk of the Navy is in Norfolk, Va and some other bases on the east coast.
Terrorists
Posted By: robthom Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Curious, as a structural engineer ( but not bridges).

Do US major bridges have protective impact defences like

r.c. enlarged landing bases around bridge support piers,

lit up like Christmas trees and

buoys/ channel markers etc.?
Posted By: 12344mag Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Damn.
Wow…what a nightmare for the folks on the bridge. God be with the rescue workers and the victims.

I’m sure the dong-huffing sec of transportation will attempt to wheel out racism, climate, and Trump later today as the causes for the incident.
Posted By: JamesJr Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.
Posted By: viking Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.


Or Rot.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Frank Sobotka gonna get laid off.

Major impacts I'd think to the port of Baltimore from a freight perspective.
Posted By: earlybrd Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Not good
That ship was under the control of a US pilot.

Bridges are a huge piece of our high value national infrastructure. Port cities can be crippled if they are taken out.
Posted By: Jeffrey Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.

I’m voting DEI hire.
Originally Posted by viking
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.


Or Rot.

Ship was leaving port, only 30 minutes or so into extended voyage. News stated there is video of the ship's lights going completely dark prior to impact. If that's true, major power failure, unable to steer ship.
Originally Posted by Gypsy_Wind
Wow…what a nightmare for the folks on the bridge. God be with the rescue workers and the victims.

I’m sure the dong-huffing sec of transportation will attempt to wheel out racism, climate, and Trump later today as the causes for the incident.

Post of the thread so far.

God have mercy on the victims and rescuers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Carroll

Built by Robert E Lee PE... before he resigned his Union Commission.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: KFWA Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
watching a video, the ship lost power twice while trying to go under the bridge.

nightmare scenario
Posted By: 10Glocks Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
The lights were on on that ship until the bridge collapsed on it and took out the front light. Only some of the lights went off for a few seconds, then came back on before impact.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Also - that bridge is the Hazmat, Oversize/Over dimensional route in/out of Baltimore harbor area. 3rd largest US Eastern Seaport - the impact on the area will be massive.

Horrible event - At that point, it would have been under control of a harbor pilot no? Lots of black smoke too - wonder if there was a catastrophic loss of motive power (lights out) creating an inability to steer and hit the pillar.
Posted By: poboy Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Coincidence again?
Originally Posted by Gypsy_Wind
Wow…what a nightmare for the folks on the bridge. God be with the rescue workers and the victims.

I’m sure the dong-huffing sec of transportation will attempt to wheel out racism, climate, and Trump later today as the causes for the incident.

Caused by racism, Climate Change, and Trump according to Mayor Pete. You're probably right.
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.

That's exactly what I was just thinking. after all, you can't get pulled over by a state trooper for a breath test when you are driving a boat in the harbor.
Posted By: bluefish Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Just saw this. Theories abound but at 130 am some people went 185 feet down in their cars to a black, watery grave. Let’s just remember that this morning.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.

That's exactly what I was just thinking. after all, you can't get pulled over by a state trooper for a breath test when you are driving a boat in the harbor.

Linky - video

Drunk captains lose power several times before hitting a bridge?

Terrorists often commit their attacks at the LEAST populated times in the morning for the lowest level of possible effect - right? 1am?
Originally Posted by Teal

WOW... Thanks for posting that...
Bummer
Posted By: bobski Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
one would think the harbor pilot would have aborted the departure..............
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by bobski
one would think the harbor pilot would have aborted the departure..............

I suspect we'll see a combo of 2 things.

1. Power loss while executing navigational maneuvers put the ship in a position without steering and adrift in the middle of a turn to starboard.
2. Power was regained, engines pushed full power (the thick smoke) and the attempt to then turn HARD to starboard to take that pilling down the port side of the boat. There wasn't enough room and it was made worse by the 2nd loss of power. No power= not enough water over the rudders to provide positive maneuverability.

They'll determine mechanical failure compounded by decision to continue/attempt a hard starboard turn rather than go port to put the pilling down the starboard side of the ship. (swing wide, instead of cut sharp)


And that's just a SWAG based off the video. I'm not an NTSB inspector at all but I've driven boats. Those that have understand that power gives you steering, lack of power SUCKS big time.
1) complete rescue/recovery
2) complete investigation.
3) get demolition crews in there and open shipping lanes through the wreckage.
4) re-evaluate and adjust use of tunnels.
5) get barges/ferries in place for land based freight transport to cross.
6) bulld a new damn bridge.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.

That's exactly what I was just thinking. after all, you can't get pulled over by a state trooper for a breath test when you are driving a boat in the harbor.

Linky - video

Drunk captains lose power several times before hitting a bridge?

Terrorists often commit their attacks at the LEAST populated times in the morning for the lowest level of possible effect - right? 1am?

Good God, what a video.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
31k vehicles a DAY went over that bridge. Can't run hazmat into tunnels. Gonna be wild re-routing that traffic.
Posted By: jorgeI Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Before anybody reads too much into this, especially without all the facts, the ship was under the control of not one but TWO port of Baltimore pilots. There are reports of the ship going "black" minutes before the collision. What that is an indicator of is the ship probably had a catastrophic/cascading power failure and not only lost way, but steerage as well and in that case, they would not even had the means to even drop anchor. If the ship lost way, even at four of five knots, it would take a lot of time to stop. The channel there is but 150yrds wide, so lost of steerage and power, what happened is very much a probability.

Jorge (USN, RET)
Posted By: TBREW401 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
The film shows the ship going dark,( power loss), then the lights come on and heavy black smoke from the stack before ship hits the bridge.
Like like a terrible accident to me.
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
That ship was under the control of a US pilot.

Bridges are a huge piece of our high value national infrastructure. Port cities can be crippled if they are taken out.



I sure hope drunk, and not intentional.

I know almost nothing about shipping or the channels there. But looking at the video, and a map, there is a good chance Baltimore harbor isn’t gonna be moving any freight for awhile.


My first concern was terrorists.

There are isolated railroad tunnels within a short distance of our family farm. Pap used to tell of troops guarding those tunnels during WWII. The Horseshoe Curve was also guarded.


It would be quite easy to seriously hurt us, with high reward, low risk attacks to key infrastructure.




American pilot?
WTF does that mean?
Does he have roots here before it was the USA?
100 years?
50?
Or is he a Farsi speaker working a visa?



Just got a notification the ship lost power.



The concern for what could happen remains
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!
Terrible. All that open water and it hits the pillar. The radio traffic from the vessel is going to interesting to hear once it’s released.

Thoughts and prayers to those that didn’t make. Just terrible.
Posted By: RufusG Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Before anybody reads too much into this, especially without all the facts, ...

You're kidding, right? They probably downed that bridge just to melt down the Fire.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

What, exactly, from a maintenance perspective could have been done to keep this bridge standing after a strike from a 95,128 ton ship?
Posted By: akrange Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by ratsmacker
Originally Posted by jimone
Will this close the port for long period?

It might, this is a really big deal. I don't know about Annapolis or whatever Navy presence in the area might be effected. Locking the Navy into their port could really upset the defense of the east coast, too. This is a big deal.

Hahahaha Hahahaha

We’re way passed the Defense of the Nation

Just ask Ted Curse, Little Marco

Hahahaha Hahahaha
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
The ship became more violent after it went dark.
Originally Posted by Teal
31k vehicles a DAY went over that bridge. Can't run hazmat into tunnels. Gonna be wild re-routing that traffic.

Re: hazmat....barges, ferries, no?
Originally Posted by Dillonbuck
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
That ship was under the control of a US pilot.

Bridges are a huge piece of our high value national infrastructure. Port cities can be crippled if they are taken out.



I sure hope drunk, and not intentional.

I know almost nothing about shipping or the channels there. But looking at the video, and a map, there is a good chance Baltimore harbor isn’t gonna be moving any freight for awhile.


My first concern was terrorists.

There are isolated railroad tunnels within a short distance of our family farm. Pap used to tell of troops guarding those tunnels during WWII. The Horseshoe Curve was also guarded.


It would be quite easy to seriously hurt us, with high reward, low risk attacks to key infrastructure.




American pilot?
WTF does that mean?
Does he have roots here before it was the USA?
100 years?
50?
Or is he a Farsi speaker working a visa?



Just got a notification the ship lost power.



The concern for what could happen remains

Most large merchant ships like that are foreign. A Pilot is someone who typically has an unlimited tonnage license and has a extensive experience in and knowledge of their port. They'll be a US citizen. Pilotage for a foreign vessel of that size is compulsory when operating in port. At some point before entering the port or getting underway from the port, the pilot takes control.

It does look like a power irregularity played a role in this.

I can't believe that bridge had an inadequate fendering system.
Posted By: earlybrd Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Traffic will be fuqkd
Posted By: TBREW401 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Replacing that bridge will be a long process.

40 years ago, a ship ran into the Sunshine skyway bridge in Tampa, in a storm, causing a collapse.
Took years to replace the bridge.
Paul,

I’m sure you meant, "One would think they would have had adequate…”


Because I’m sure you believe it,
and probably aren’t too surprised they didn’t.


Here in America we like to buy bling,
even if it means we can’t buy socks.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by Teal
31k vehicles a DAY went over that bridge. Can't run hazmat into tunnels. Gonna be wild re-routing that traffic.

Re: hazmat....barges, ferries, no?

Theoretically - yes. But I don't know what their average tonnage for hazmat per day would be and if the barge/ferry can carry the truck/trailer to move it. Otherwise you're looking to cross dock it prior, move over water, cross dock again and go onto delivery. Adds days to transit and thousands to cost. Multiple thousands. Not counting the cost of the ferry/barge.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I can't believe that bridge had an inadequate fendering system.

Second press conference the guy was asked if this has ever happened before.

After a pause like are you kidding me, the answer was, not in Baltimore.

There's your answer, hasn't happened before so didn't need it.

I'd bet heavy odds the new bridge will......
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Dillonbuck
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
That ship was under the control of a US pilot.

Bridges are a huge piece of our high value national infrastructure. Port cities can be crippled if they are taken out.



I sure hope drunk, and not intentional.

I know almost nothing about shipping or the channels there. But looking at the video, and a map, there is a good chance Baltimore harbor isn’t gonna be moving any freight for awhile.


My first concern was terrorists.

There are isolated railroad tunnels within a short distance of our family farm. Pap used to tell of troops guarding those tunnels during WWII. The Horseshoe Curve was also guarded.


It would be quite easy to seriously hurt us, with high reward, low risk attacks to key infrastructure.




American pilot?
WTF does that mean?
Does he have roots here before it was the USA?
100 years?
50?
Or is he a Farsi speaker working a visa?



Just got a notification the ship lost power.



The concern for what could happen remains

Most large merchant ships like that are foreign. A Pilot is someone who typically has an unlimited tonnage license and has a extensive experience in and knowledge of their port. They'll be a US citizen. Pilotage for a foreign vessel of that size is compulsory when operating in port. At some point before entering the port or getting underway from the port, the pilot takes control.

It does look like a power irregularity played a role in this.

I can't believe that bridge had an inadequate fendering system.

NBC is reporting that the DALI is Singapore flagged ship outbound from Baltimore to Sri Lanka.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

What, exactly, from a maintenance perspective could have been done to keep this bridge standing after a strike from a 95,128 ton ship?

A robust bridge fendering system.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by Teal
31k vehicles a DAY went over that bridge. Can't run hazmat into tunnels. Gonna be wild re-routing that traffic.

Re: hazmat....barges, ferries, no?

Theoretically - yes. But I don't know what their average tonnage for hazmat per day would be and if the barge/ferry can carry the truck/trailer to move it. Otherwise you're looking to cross dock it prior, move over water, cross dock again and go onto delivery. Adds days to transit and thousands to cost. Multiple thousands. Not counting the cost of the ferry/barge.

Well yeah, but what's the alternative.

What's the best drive around route and would that be more effective.
Posted By: jorgeI Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

What, exactly, from a maintenance perspective could have been done to keep this bridge standing after a strike from a 95,128 ton ship?

A robust bridge fendering system.

A fender trying to stop a 100K plus ton ship moving at two or three knots, there isn't a fender in the world that would stop it.
There would be lights, but I’ve never seen any other protective devices on bridge piers. I built and repaired roads and bridges for 30 years. Red and green channel marker lights are all I’ve ever seen locally.
Posted By: RufusG Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by gregintenn
I built and repaired bridges for 30 years.

I hear there's some work back East.
Originally Posted by Teal
What, exactly, from a maintenance perspective could have been done to keep this bridge standing after a strike from a 95,128 ton ship?

The 1972 FSK bridge was a minimally build structure (same era of budget building as the failed Twin Towers).

All commercial construction from that era is a mere fraction of modern construction standards.

In fairness... I have not studied the exact piles and pile caps that failed (from the impact of the vessel), but the replacements will be 500% PLUS bigger and stronger for sure.
Posted By: GAGoober Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Fox News (FWIW) just reported that no foul play was suspected. How can they maje a statement like that so soon into this event? It takes the NTSB six months or more to figure that out on most accidents.
I had the misfortune of driving through, or around, Baltimore 8 or 10 times in the Big Rig. The traffic was horrible. I hate to think of what it will be with I 695 shut down.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: oldcuss Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
How long do you suppose it will take to get the permits and

paperwork to build a new bridge?
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

What, exactly, from a maintenance perspective could have been done to keep this bridge standing after a strike from a 95,128 ton ship?

A robust bridge fendering system.

A fender trying to stop a 100K plus ton ship moving at two or three knots, there isn't a fender in the world that would stop it.

I suspect that the vessel was going a bit faster than that, but there are fendering systems that will prevent direct contact with the bridge. I have seen islands of rock built around bridge support structures. Some extending over 100 yards away. That would have prevented this. That option may not be practical for that location, but I'll bet when the bridge is rebuilt, they'll find a way to substantially improve upon the previous system.
Posted By: BigNate Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by GAGoober
Fox News (FWIW) just reported that no foul play was suspected. How can they maje a statement like that so soon into this event? It takes the NTSB six months or more to figure that out on most accidents.

They are told what to broadcast. The best way to control the narrative is to tell the story you want told first, then repeat it often.
I wonder if it's possible to cyber attack the onboard computer from afar?
Originally Posted by GAGoober
Fox News (FWIW) just reported that no foul play was suspected. How can they maje a statement like that so soon into this event? It takes the NTSB six months or more to figure that out on most accidents.

Feedback from the pilot on board.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
So it looked like he was turning into the channel. Power went out, probably overcorrected trying to steer while the power is off. Power comes back on and now all the sudden he is headed straight for the pier. Power flickers again, he tries to back up (which even anyone who has driven a bass boat knows is counterproductive but instinctive) and slams into the pier.

I don’t know schit about big ships or bridges but that looks like what happened just watching the various videos out there.
Gnoahhh lives in Annapolis I sent him a text at 5:50 this AM. He just got back he is still among us..mb
Posted By: GAGoober Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by CashisKing
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Looks like the bridge is just sitting there with not much side support other than that.
Originally Posted by oldcuss
How long do you suppose it will take to get the permits and

paperwork to build a new bridge?

The bigger question is when will the Port of Baltimore reopen... IF EVER.

FYI... there is a bridge in the channel.

Some Stock Market moves here...
Originally Posted by Fireball2
I wonder if it's possible to cyber attack the onboard computer from afar?

Maybe...

But I am going to go with the local human factor instead... LOTTA brokedickness in Baltimore.

Water in fuel because it wasn't checked properly... No idea, but crap like that is where my guess is going to be.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Originally Posted by oldcuss
How long do you suppose it will take to get the permits and

paperwork to build a new bridge?

The bigger question is when will the Port of Baltimore reopen... IF EVER.

FYI... there is a bridge in the channel.

Some Stock Market moves here...

I suspect that the channel can be cleared and opened relatively quickly. Much of that depends upon water depth and clearance over the obstruction.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.
Originally Posted by ratsmacker
Originally Posted by jimone
Will this close the port for long period?

It might, this is a really big deal. I don't know about Annapolis or whatever Navy presence in the area might be effected. Locking the Navy into their port could really upset the defense of the east coast, too. This is a big deal.

Baltimore is not a Navy Port. It is however the leading Auto Import Port to the U.S. Also deals in Coal I believe.

Anyone know where the camera was located?

Dundalk terminal?

It appears that the Dali left the Seagirt Terminal and after being released by the tugs headed for the bridge and made a slight deviation to starboard about two or three ship lengths from the bridge.
Posted By: BOBBALEE Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Just saw the teevee. FBI said no terrorists involved. And Brandon's been told about it. So everything is ok. Just calm down. Heroic efforts are under way.
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Originally Posted by ratsmacker
Originally Posted by jimone
Will this close the port for long period?

It might, this is a really big deal. I don't know about Annapolis or whatever Navy presence in the area might be effected. Locking the Navy into their port could really upset the defense of the east coast, too. This is a big deal.

Baltimore is not a Navy Port. It is however the leading Auto Import Port to the U.S. Also deals in Coal I believe.

Correct... We also ship lots of timber overseas from B.
I know virtually nothing about ships, but don’t those big ones run giant diesel engines? Which means a power interruption would not affect the engine, but would affect the steering and control of the engines?

It’s not like they have a stop/start feature like on new cars.
Loved taking that bridge detour back in the day. That's way tall to fall in the water all of a sudden. Negligent pilot. Or drunk like Valdez.
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by gregintenn
I built and repaired bridges for 30 years.

I hear there's some work back East.
Baltimore would be a long commute from Middle Tennessee. I’m out!
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

Fairly narrow channel Paul...

I used to commute to work by boat in that channel... large vessel traffic was very very straight line.

Remember the grounding near Annapolis last year? Dude got out of the channel (same company or Captain as the Suez mess IIRC).
The shipping industry as a whole have always fought the insurance industry, and pilotage rules...it costs money to charter a tug. But in this case and many others, one or two assist vessels would have saved the day. Foreign flag ownership exacerbates the problem...poorly trained officers, minimum maintenance and safety standards. When there is an incident, the foreign flag owners just declare bankruptcy, move on and start a new company...leaving a pittance in insurance to clean up the aftermath. Mandatory assist tugs from pierside to open water would take almost all the risk away...kinda handy to have 6,000 hp available to the pilot in an instant. In the case of containerships with their huge 'sail area' and tankers, 2 tugs...but oh no...it costs too much.
It sure seems like Ol Mayor Pete has had a lot on his plate since becoming transportation secretary. Good thing he’s up to the task.
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by Teal
31k vehicles a DAY went over that bridge. Can't run hazmat into tunnels. Gonna be wild re-routing that traffic.

Re: hazmat....barges, ferries, no?

Theoretically - yes. But I don't know what their average tonnage for hazmat per day would be and if the barge/ferry can carry the truck/trailer to move it. Otherwise you're looking to cross dock it prior, move over water, cross dock again and go onto delivery. Adds days to transit and thousands to cost. Multiple thousands. Not counting the cost of the ferry/barge.

Well yeah, but what's the alternative.

What's the best drive around route and would that be more effective.

Everything will have to go around the West and North sides of the Beltway. If traffic is OK, it's not too bad. If it's rush hour it could add an hour or so.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Good Article from John Konrad

John's an expert and well worth his opinion.
Posted By: Pat85 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by oldcuss
How long do you suppose it will take to get the permits and

paperwork to build a new bridge?

No one is going to have to apply for a permit in this situation.
Originally Posted by Pat85
Originally Posted by oldcuss
How long do you suppose it will take to get the permits and

paperwork to build a new bridge?

No one is going to have to apply for a permit in this situation.
Correct! We once had some bad flood damaged main arteries locally. I was instructed to “Get them open!” No permits, no erosion control, nothing but “Open the damned roads!!!”
Posted By: RicG Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Gotta be Trumps fault.
Originally Posted by Wannabebwana
I know virtually nothing about ships, but don’t those big ones run giant diesel engines? Which means a power interruption would not affect the engine, but would affect the steering and control of the engines?

It’s not like they have a stop/start feature like on new cars.

Generally ships, like houses or anything else have interior/exterior lighting on a separate circuit. Likewise navigation, and electronics should be on their own circuits...

They still communicate with the engine room engineering spaces as bridge controls are mostly "fly by wire"
Posted By: Longbob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by flintlocke
The shipping industry as a whole have always fought the insurance industry, and pilotage rules...it costs money to charter a tug. But in this case and many others, one or two assist vessels would have saved the day. Foreign flag ownership exacerbates the problem...poorly trained officers, minimum maintenance and safety standards. When there is an incident, the foreign flag owners just declare bankruptcy, move on and start a new company...leaving a pittance in insurance to clean up the aftermath. Mandatory assist tugs from pierside to open water would take almost all the risk away...kinda handy to have 6,000 hp available to the pilot in an instant. In the case of containerships with their huge 'sail area' and tankers, 2 tugs...but oh no...it costs too much.


The article linked said that they had tugs, but had released them prior to the power going out it appears.

"According to Marine Traffic the ship departed the Seagirt Marine Terminal in the Port of Baltimore at approximately 00:30 local time, sailed northwest past the Nuclear Ship Savanah then turned southeast to depart the harbor, released the tugboats, and collided with the bridge at approximately 01:38."
Posted By: jorgeI Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

There were TWO pilots on board, the fact (again) it went dark before ramming the bridge, certainly points to loss of way and steerage with no way of stopping a ship that large.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
It sure seems like Ol Mayor Pete has had a lot on his plate since becoming transportation secretary. Good thing he’s up to the task.
He’s taking it all in right now as we speak. He’s digesting it if you will.
Posted By: Esox357 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
I know where to fish now if I'm ever up that way. Bring extra hooks and line.
Posted By: JakeM78 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.


Agreed
Posted By: Pat85 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

There were TWO pilots on board, the fact (again) it went dark before ramming the bridge, certainly points to loss of way and steerage with no way of stopping a ship that large.

Don't tugs escort ships past obstacles?
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Pat85
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

There were TWO pilots on board, the fact (again) it went dark before ramming the bridge, certainly points to loss of way and steerage with no way of stopping a ship that large.

Don't tugs escort ships past obstacles?

Ships are not required to have tugboat escorts when passing under the Francis Scott Key Bridge so they have limited ability to slow down on their own when they lose power and can not put the propeller into reverse.

According to past photos, she is equipped with a bow thruster. However, these are not typically connected to emergency power systems. Even if it were engaged, bow thrusters are designed for slow-speed maneuvers and have a limited ability to push the bow into the wind when the ship’s speed exceeds 5 knots.
Video commentary says pictures show port side anchor was dropped.

Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

There were TWO pilots on board, the fact (again) it went dark before ramming the bridge, certainly points to loss of way and steerage with no way of stopping a ship that large.

I read that the first time you posted it. I wanted to fill in some blanks for him since he said he knew nothing about it. Oddly, I answered the question he asked. LOL
Originally Posted by Pat85
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

There were TWO pilots on board, the fact (again) it went dark before ramming the bridge, certainly points to loss of way and steerage with no way of stopping a ship that large.

Don't tugs escort ships past obstacles?

Yes and no. Typically they only nurse them through docking and departing. In some cases, given the whole of the circumstances, they will stay hooked up to them around other obstacles. In busier ports, it'd take a massive fleet of tugs to get all of the merchant vessels past all of the hazards.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
I drove over that bridge regularly. It's only 20 minutes from where I live. This incident has done nothing for my fear of heights and tall bridges. I always say a little prayer whenever I cross any of our Bay bridges. You look down and see a ship approaching and think "Jesus Christ if that big bastard even so much as grazed a pylon...."

The Chesapeake Bay Pilots Association is, as stated earlier, a very insular but very professional organization. The knowledge required and the tests to pass is mind boggling - they are a very sharp bunch of cookies. (And paid very handsomely for it.) Ships, all ships, are commandeered far south of here on the Bay by a pilot who threads it through the narrow shipping lanes, ditto in reverse. Unless shown otherwise I gotta keep faith that a pilot was at the helm and that it had to have been caused by some sort of systems failure that he was powerless to cope with. Those guys know those channels and the Bay in general better than you know your way around your living room.

Aftermath: My fair state (fairly f*cked up state) is gonna be hard pressed to scrape together the money to rebuild it. There'll have to be Federal input. The "rainy day, budget surplus" left behind by a Republican administration was immediately frittered completely away by the incoming Democrat admin on frivolous "social programs". Betcha right now they wish they hadn't.

All I know for sure is I'll not be driving anywhere near Baltimore for a long time. Y'all have no idea how badly this is gonna bollox up traffic in my area. We're locked in by all the water that surrounds us - the Bay and its estuaries, rivers, creeks, etc. - there is a finite convoluted land mass that can be traveled upon. Destinations only three miles away typically entails a five or six mile journey because of that. Add now the re-routing off of I-95/695 and there's yet another reason I wish I could move the hell away. This once quaint charming area is now a hell of urban/suburban sprawl with attendant traffic nightmares on a good day, and good days are in the rearview mirror now.
Wife is reading two have been pulled from water alive.
Thankfully it wasn't rush hour, there'd be a whole lot more dead. I noticed in the videos that there were a couple of truck drivers that had God on their side this morning. Prayers go out to the souls that went down with the bridge.

I've never been across it, but I went under it on a cruise ship one time. The Port of Baltimore is huge and there's a lot of ship traffic in and out of there. My major import supplier is located there. This will screw them up and cause my prices to go up. They'll have to bring their containers in through NJ or Philly. Overseas freight rates have already been going up because of the clusterfuk in the Red Sea. There's nothing good that'll come out of this. I would imagine that they'll have the channel open in short order. But what's that, a month, 3 months, 6 months? I'm sure that the channel has some serious current, so it'll be challenging.
Posted By: Tyrone Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Bet that bridge is bumper-to-bumper traffic from 7am-7pm.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Pat85
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.

Very low odds. Pilot associations are known for nepotism and chronyism. They are nigh impossible for an outsider to crack and generally beyond outside influence.

There were TWO pilots on board, the fact (again) it went dark before ramming the bridge, certainly points to loss of way and steerage with no way of stopping a ship that large.

Don't tugs escort ships past obstacles?

Yes and no. Typically they only nurse them through docking and departing. In some cases, given the whole of the circumstances, they will stay hooked up to them around other obstacles. In busier ports, it'd take a massive fleet of tugs to get all of the merchant vessels past all of the hazards.

Yep. And bear in mind the shipping channels in and around B'More are crazy narrow, and not 100% stable (silting in from the couple waterways that empty out here demands constant dredging to maintain). I'll wager that the shipping channel at the choke point that the FSK bridge traversed is a lot narrower than you think - barely wide enough for two huge ships to pass each other (which means that whenever possible it's a one-way street) - further negating the optimal use of tugs. You never see tugs that far out of the Inner Harbor.
Maybe they can raise gas prices up to $8 a gallon nationwide now just to punish the American people some more.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Bet that bridge is bumper-to-bumper traffic from 7am-7pm.

Yep.
Posted By: KC Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Checking my digital maps. There's another way around that island, to the East, called Kent Narrows. Appears to be about 200 yards wide. I wonder how high that bridge is? How deep is the water?
Posted By: ribka Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists

Drunk ship captain more like it.


a drunk pilot caused the ship to lose all power approaching the bridge.

please explain. lol
Posted By: ribka Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by BigNate
Originally Posted by GAGoober
Fox News (FWIW) just reported that no foul play was suspected. How can they maje a statement like that so soon into this event? It takes the NTSB six months or more to figure that out on most accidents.

They are told what to broadcast. The best way to control the narrative is to tell the story you want told first, then repeat it often.


Fox News? lol
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
No
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
185', 50' of water
Posted By: Osky Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Can the bridge, build a tunnel.

Osky
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
185', 50' of water
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by BigNate
Originally Posted by GAGoober
Fox News (FWIW) just reported that no foul play was suspected. How can they maje a statement like that so soon into this event? It takes the NTSB six months or more to figure that out on most accidents.

They are told what to broadcast. The best way to control the narrative is to tell the story you want told first, then repeat it often.


Fox News? lol

DNC.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s Baltimore. What are the odds that the pilot was some union/DEI hire who usually slept through the transit? Once again, I know nothing about ships or bridges.
Originally Posted by Crash_Pad
Loved taking that bridge detour back in the day. That's way tall to fall in the water all of a sudden. Negligent pilot. Or drunk like Valdez.
I have no knowledge of east coast pilot assn's, but having had many opportunities to get to know pilots in the Puget Sound marine operations..they are unquestionably the best of the best. Piloting is the very pinnacle of experience, ability and cool thoughtful command under pressure. The chronyism that the bicycle cop Barnard referred to is one of the best features of the pilot hierarchy...they do not suffer fools or the incompetent for one instant...they clean their ranks long before any mishap.
Posted By: KC Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Also there's the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. I wonder how navigable that is?
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by KC
Checking my digital maps. There's another way around that island, to the East, called Kent Narrows. Appears to be about 200 yards wide. I wonder how high that bridge is? How deep is the water?

I read that the controlling depth of Kent Narrows is 6 feet. The ship that hit this bridge draws ~40
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by KC
Also there's the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. I wonder how navigable that is?

35 feet I guess?

Wonder if we'll see a return to lighting ships in harbors by smaller operators then to get them inland?
Posted By: ribka Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by KC
Also there's the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. I wonder how navigable that is?


too shallow and narrow for large ships. I've fished that many times
Sure seems to be a Hell if alot of accidents now days! Trains derailing, plane problems, not to mention Fires
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by KC
Checking my digital maps. There's another way around that island, to the East, called Kent Narrows. Appears to be about 200 yards wide. I wonder how high that bridge is? How deep is the water?

I live two or three miles west from the Rt. 50 (an interstate hwy) bridge over the Bay at Kent Island, the next bridge south of the FSK bridge and far north of the next bridge to the south down by Norfolk. Our bridge is four miles long, and the shipping channel underneath it is wide and deep. What you're referring to, Kent Narrows, is the narrow shallow channel of water that separates Kent Island (a damn big island it is) from the land mass of Maryland's Eastern Shore. It isn't navigable by ships. It's the province of sport boats and fishing/crabbing boats. For years the bridge over the Narrows was a drawbridge but is now supplemented by a permanent bridge which isn't very high off the water.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by KC
Also there's the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. I wonder how navigable that is?

35 feet I guess?

Wonder if we'll see a return to lighting ships in harbors by smaller operators then to get them inland?

I kinda doubt that...lightering is THE most expensive way of moving cargo. Ask BP, ARCO, EXXON, ALEYESKA what my company charged them to deliver everything to build the Prudhoe field and pipeline.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by KC
Also there's the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. I wonder how navigable that is?

35 feet I guess?

Wonder if we'll see a return to lighting ships in harbors by smaller operators then to get them inland?

I kinda doubt that...lightering is THE most expensive way of moving cargo. Ask BP, ARCO, EXXON, ALEYESKA what my company charged them to deliver everything to build the Prudhoe field and pipeline.

The alternative would be to shut down the #3 eastern seaport until cleared. It's not IDEAL but Baltimore being closed isn't much of an option either.
me too
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by saddlering
Sure seems to be a Hell if alot of accidents now days! Trains derailing, plane problems, not to mention Fires
it kind of makes one Wonder at times that's for sure. but then again there are an awful lot of just stupid people in this world too. and a lot of them stupid people have jobs... that they probably shouldn't have
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Breaking - Ship issued a Mayday due to power outage prior to crash, allowing DOT to close bridge B4 collision.
Being reported that the captain sent out a mayday and the bridge got closed to motor vehicle traffic or it would have been a lot worse.
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Yeah, reported 3 minutes ago .
Originally Posted by RAM
Yeah, reported 3 minutes ago .

I was typing when you posted, sorry
Posted By: Pugs Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by KC
Checking my digital maps. There's another way around that island, to the East, called Kent Narrows. Appears to be about 200 yards wide. I wonder how high that bridge is? How deep is the water?

Wrong bridge - FSK is (well, was) further north than the Bay Bridge.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
"This once quaint charming area is now a hell of urban/suburban sprawl with attendant traffic nightmares on a good day, and good days are in the rearview mirror now"

Here we have a local, gnoahh, chiming in on my assessment, where I talked about driving through Baltimore in the 18 wheeler, and what a traffic hell hole it was before the bridge collapse.
Fox and CNN keep reporting that two have been recovered from the water, and six are missing.

I dug around and found that there are six construction workers missing. But on top of that there are 7 cars that went in to the water, no telling how many people were in those cars.

Good God had this happened at 8am there would be 200 cars in the water.
The organization that I work for has facilities that regularly use this port. This will make things interesting for a while.
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Fox and CNN keep reporting that two have been recovered from the water, and six are missing.

I dug around and found that there are six construction workers missing. But on top of that there are 7 cars that went in to the water, no telling how many people were in those cars.

Good God had this happened at 8am there would be 200 cars in the water.

Not sure the report of cars in the water is accurate.
Posted By: KC Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
After we have taken care of the injured, then #1 priority is to open one of those spans of below the bridge to maritime traffic. Just move stuff out of the way and get a slot open so that ships can move between. Then the pressure will be off and we can plan the other operations like how to replace the bridge.
"Three passenger vehicles, a cement truck and another vehicle have been located in the water using infrared and sonar technology, Baltimore City Fire Chief James Wallace told CNN."

That would be a bad way to die.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Posted By: TwoTall Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Tragic, prayers sent.
Posted By: Calvin Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by mirage243
Originally Posted by RAM
Yeah, reported 3 minutes ago .

I was typing when you posted, sorry

How dare you try to out report a newshound.
Mayor Pete is on the way---

Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today
From CNN's Kaitlan Collins


US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today, a staff member with the agency confirmed to CNN.

Buttigieg spoke to Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, according to a post from the secretary on X.

"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," Buttigieg wrote.
Posted By: Calvin Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by steve4102
Terrorists


Still batting a 100 I see.
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---

Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today
From CNN's Kaitlan Collins


US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today, a staff member with the agency confirmed to CNN.

Buttigieg spoke to Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, according to a post from the secretary on X.

"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," Buttigieg wrote.
Mayor pete .will get to the bottom of this,and fill in the cracks .his butts on the line
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by rem shooter
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---

Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today
From CNN's Kaitlan Collins


US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today, a staff member with the agency confirmed to CNN.

Buttigieg spoke to Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, according to a post from the secretary on X.

"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," Buttigieg wrote.
Mayor pete .will get to the bottom of this,and fill in the cracks .his butts on the line

Boy that gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. Not. Our Governor Wes Moore is a Joe Biden lackey and a Gavin Newsom wannabe, and the Mayor of Baltimore is a clueless twit. Don't get me started on Pete Butty-gag.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by gnoahhh
Originally Posted by rem shooter
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---

Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today
From CNN's Kaitlan Collins


US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is heading to Baltimore today, a staff member with the agency confirmed to CNN.

Buttigieg spoke to Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, according to a post from the secretary on X.

"Rescue efforts remain underway and drivers in the Baltimore area should follow local responder guidance on detours and response," Buttigieg wrote.
Mayor pete .will get to the bottom of this,and fill in the cracks .his butts on the line

Boy that gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. Not. Our Governor Wes Moore is a Joe Biden lackey and a Gavin Newsom wannabe, and the Mayor of Baltimore is a clueless twit. Don't get me started on Pete Butty-gag.

So you're saying The Wire is a documentary?
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-76.503/centery:39.254/zoom:12

Interesting site I've followed for years.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Pugs
Originally Posted by KC
Checking my digital maps. There's another way around that island, to the East, called Kent Narrows. Appears to be about 200 yards wide. I wonder how high that bridge is? How deep is the water?

Wrong bridge - FSK is (well, was) further north than the Bay Bridge.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I live at the intersection of Rt.50 and Rt.2/179, in the lower left quadrant of this map. I look out my 2nd floor down onto Rt.50 to the south about 200 yards away.

You can tell from this illustration how waterways (primarily the Chesapeake Bay and tributary rivers) dominate our local world. There are no straight lines "from here to there". This is the hard reality that'll dominate the coming traffic congestion due to the bridge collapse.
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Fox and CNN keep reporting that two have been recovered from the water, and six are missing.

I dug around and found that there are six construction workers missing. But on top of that there are 7 cars that went in to the water, no telling how many people were in those cars.

Good God had this happened at 8am there would be 200 cars in the water.

7 people, not cars. 2 rescued And there was a mayday. Bridge was closed. Had it been 08:00 the bridge would have still been closed.

But thanx for the fake drama.
Posted By: Paul_M Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
"Three passenger vehicles, a cement truck and another vehicle have been located in the water using infrared and sonar technology, Baltimore City Fire Chief James Wallace told CNN."

That would be a bad way to die.
The cement truck was probably there with the work crew.
Maybe the cars were theirs also? I doubt they walked up onto the bridge to go to work.
Does anyone know if this is the first time that a major U.S. port has been blocked by debris?


For instance I know that the Coronado Bridge in San Diego is built out of box sections (I actually was able to walk through them on a tour once). The rumor is that the box sections (with dogged bulkhead doors) were so designed because in the event of a bridge failure, the sections could be towed out of the way. 32nd street Naval Base is inside the bridge.

I forget the real reason for the box sections, given on the tour, but it was not because they would float. Maybe they would break up in a way so as to not impede navigation???
Posted By: Redneck Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
When I first saw the video this morning about 5:30 am, one thing I noticed after about the third viewing was the fact that the lights went out on the ship twice before the impact... I.e., they lost power and any steering capability.. It happens..



Just thank God the traffic at that time of night was so very light.. Prayers for all those involved..
Posted By: 1minute Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Well, that won't buff out.
Posted By: Morewood Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---

Thank you Jesus. The adults are now in charge.


(sarc)
Posted By: KC Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Looks like I95 is going to get a lot busier for awhile.
Posted By: SupFoo Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Morewood
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---
Thank you Jesus. The adults are now in charge.(sarc)

Pete's running late. Some late morning spooning with his husband.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Does anyone know if this is the first time that a major U.S. port has been blocked by debris?


For instance I know that the Coronado Bridge in San Diego is built out of box sections (I actually was able to walk through them on a tour once). The rumor is that the box sections (with dogged bulkhead doors) were so designed because in the event of a bridge failure, the sections could be towed out of the way. 32nd street Naval Base is inside the bridge.

I forget the real reason for the box sections, given on the tour, but it was not because they would float. Maybe they would break up in a way so as to not impede navigation???

Likely built that way for earthquake damage mitigation. It's a whole lot easier, faster, and more economical to replace a section or two than an entire bridge.
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Originally Posted by Morewood
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---
Thank you Jesus. The adults are now in charge.(sarc)

Pete's running late. Some late morning spooning with his husband.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Hope he brings his diving chit. He can see everything above water on tv.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by KC
Also there's the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. I wonder how navigable that is?

35 feet I guess?

Wonder if we'll see a return to lighting ships in harbors by smaller operators then to get them inland?

With cars being one of the prevalent products, I don't think lightering will work very well. Same with containers. You'll likely see other ports absorb that cargo.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Originally Posted by mirage243
Originally Posted by RAM
Yeah, reported 3 minutes ago .

I was typing when you posted, sorry

How dare you try to out report a newshound.

Lol
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?

I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.
Posted By: Raeford Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Norfolk/Hampton Roads/Portsmouth going to be wide open I suppose.
Savannah too I guess.
It is a disaster no matter how you look at it.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Does anyone know if this is the first time that a major U.S. port has been blocked by debris?


For instance I know that the Coronado Bridge in San Diego is built out of box sections (I actually was able to walk through them on a tour once). The rumor is that the box sections (with dogged bulkhead doors) were so designed because in the event of a bridge failure, the sections could be towed out of the way. 32nd street Naval Base is inside the bridge.

I forget the real reason for the box sections, given on the tour, but it was not because they would float. Maybe they would break up in a way so as to not impede navigation???

Likely built that way for earthquake damage mitigation. It's a whole lot easier, faster, and more economical to replace a section or two than an entire bridge.

I think you are right. Something about how a box section handles P waves and S-waves.
Posted By: Riverc Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Originally Posted by Morewood
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Mayor Pete is on the way---
Thank you Jesus. The adults are now in charge.(sarc)

Pete's running late. Some late morning spooning with his husband.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Damn shame we have a mentally ill Pete in charge of this. I feel sorry for those 2 babies they adopted their minds will be warped at and early age. Should be a law against queers adopting kids.
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by OldmanoftheSea
Does anyone know if this is the first time that a major U.S. port has been blocked by debris?


For instance I know that the Coronado Bridge in San Diego is built out of box sections (I actually was able to walk through them on a tour once). The rumor is that the box sections (with dogged bulkhead doors) were so designed because in the event of a bridge failure, the sections could be towed out of the way. 32nd street Naval Base is inside the bridge.

I forget the real reason for the box sections, given on the tour, but it was not because they would float. Maybe they would break up in a way so as to not impede navigation???

Likely built that way for earthquake damage mitigation. It's a whole lot easier, faster, and more economical to replace a section or two than an entire bridge.

I think you are right. Something about how a box section handles P waves and S-waves.
We always built box bridges in 40' sections. I don't know all the science behind it, but I was told it was because of earthquakes.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.

Thanks Coastie.

They sure seem fast to claim it was just an accident. It probably was a mishap but if someone had done sabotage would this not be a predictable result of losing steerage/power while upstream of the bridge?
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.

Thanks Coastie.

They sure seem fast to claim it was just an accident. It probably was a mishap but if someone had done sabotage would this not be a predictable result of losing steerage/power while upstream of the bridge?

John, I am too far removed from that aspect of shipping to be able to give a qualified answer.

Shooting from the hip, I think it would be very hard for an outsider to sabotage the ship in a way that the sabotage wouldn't become apparent until that point in their voyage. Internal sabotage? Possible I suppose, but still shooting from the hip. I have a hunch that angle will be well investigated.
Posted By: 007FJ Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Frank Sobotka gonna get laid off.

Major impacts I'd think to the port of Baltimore from a freight perspective.

Not many on here will get that one. Not exactly the Group that would like the Bunk or McNolte
Posted By: RAM Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.

Thanks Coastie.

They sure seem fast to claim it was just an accident. It probably was a mishap but if someone had done sabotage would this not be a predictable result of losing steerage/power while upstream of the bridge?

Well, i you read some threads or watched some news you would know why it was an accident.

But no, come here and push conspiracy.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by 007FJ
Originally Posted by Teal
Frank Sobotka gonna get laid off.

Major impacts I'd think to the port of Baltimore from a freight perspective.

Not many on here will get that one. Not exactly the Group that would like the Bunk or McNolte

I think they'd like Bunk - if exposed to it. lol.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Raeford
Norfolk/Hampton Roads/Portsmouth going to be wide open I suppose.
Savannah too I guess.

Savannah been growing like a mo'fo. If anyone can take on the extra volume, it's them. From an attitude perspective.
I wonder when the full on conspiracies will start and why Q didn't warn us?
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional
I am not familiar with the area, but I’ve rarely encountered a river channel elsewhere that ran a straight line.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Correct! We once had some bad flood damaged main arteries locally. I was instructed to “Get them open!” No permits, no erosion control, nothing but “Open the damned roads!!!”

2010 flood the one that trashed Opryland, right?
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional

It's hard to tell from the video, but the initial power failure occurred while the vessel was still a considerable distance from the bridge. If they had a little rudder on, that could have put their trajectory into the bridge.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional

It's hard to tell from the video, but the initial power failure occurred while the vessel was still a considerable distance from the bridge. If they had a little rudder on, that could have put their trajectory into the bridge.

And I'm sure, as reported, they also had to clear other vessel traffic prior to - means they're not dead nuts middle of the road.
I appreciate the clear headed comments and link from Teal, Gnoahh, and some others. I've been over the Key Bridge a couple of times and appreciate Gnoahh's trepidation on the crossing. As on our Mackinac Bridge (da Bridge) the driver doesn't get to admire the adjacent views.

Regardless of whether the Dali is diesel, diesel electric, or steam turbine electric powered, the propulsion, rudder, and bow thruster controls from the bridge would be electrical/electronic and subject to failure from the two apparent power outages. Both indicators and control devices for propulsion and steering would malfunction.
The real takeaway from this is that, sheit breaks, things go wrong, and you can't do anything about it.
I just took an advanced maritime navigation/chart plotting course in addition to my USCG 100T Masters license and the charts we used in both classes are the Chesapeake Bay charts “frozen in time” by the USCG. It can be a complicated area to navigate even without vessel traffic. I first thought that the ship either lost power or it was intentional but I’m glad that it wasn’t intentional. Accidents happen unfortunately and maritime disasters often lead to better regulations in an attempt to avoid repeating the error chain that led to something like this.

The NTSB and USCG reports will be interesting…
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Thanks Coastie.

They sure seem fast to claim it was just an accident. It probably was a mishap but if someone had done sabotage would this not be a predictable result of losing steerage/power while upstream of the bridge?
Originally Posted by RAM
Well, i you read some threads or watched some news you would know why it was an accident.

But no, come here and push conspiracy.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Posted By: ribka Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.

Thanks Coastie.

They sure seem fast to claim it was just an accident. It probably was a mishap but if someone had done sabotage would this not be a predictable result of losing steerage/power while upstream of the bridge?

John, I am too far removed from that aspect of shipping to be able to give a qualified answer.

Shooting from the hip, I think it would be very hard for an outsider to sabotage the ship in a way that the sabotage wouldn't become apparent until that point in their voyage. Internal sabotage? Possible I suppose, but still shooting from the hip. I have a hunch that angle will be well investigated.


https://x.com/jordan_sather_/status/1772634611736007027?s=46




Anyone know why or how a larger container ship can lose power and lose steering capabilities??

No immediate gen back up
Originally Posted by robthom
Curious, as a structural engineer ( but not bridges).

Do US major bridges have protective impact defences like

r.c. enlarged landing bases around bridge support piers,

lit up like Christmas trees and

buoys/ channel markers etc.?



I know the sunshine skyway has them.. After it got hit and killed a lot of people.
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional

And “t” wept.
What a horrific nightmare for all involved! I saw three vehicles, one a semi, make it over that bridge before the collision! Terrible rescue scenario too, and the recovery is going to be ugly!
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Correct! We once had some bad flood damaged main arteries locally. I was instructed to “Get them open!” No permits, no erosion control, nothing but “Open the damned roads!!!”

2010 flood the one that trashed Opryland, right?
That would be the one. I’ve seen it rain, but never saw anything like that!
Posted By: Morewood Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Buckle your seatbelts, men. I fear this is but the first of many 2024 catastrophes awaiting the US.

Stolen elections and corrupt leaders bring consequences.
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/MIyJgN0NYhs?si=RzUTuF8UDKS67BlL[/video]


Intensional, watch the video
Looks like it takes about 50 seconds to cross the entire bridge. And the crash happened at 2:49ish in the video. That's enough time to empty the bridge three times in just the time it took to film this video. And the ship hailed mayday and indicated a possible collision before this video. Even if it was just 10 minutes before the start of this video, that's enough time for authorities to block entrance to the bridge on both sides. While the ship is clearly at fault, I have to place additional blame on the port authority for continuing to allow vehicles to cross the bridge.

The person who asked about bridge design, some locations do require piles or other abutments in front of bridge piers, mostly for erosion/ice control, but also boats. A collision with a cargo ship of this size is significantly beyond any possible design requirement for a bridge support. The mass of the bridge and all the cars on it, probably isn't even as much as the mass of the engine, and just the engine - on the ship. The bridge didn't stand a chance.
Posted By: Raeford Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
"And the ship hailed mayday and indicated a possible collision before this video. Even if it was just 10 minutes before the start of this video, that's enough time for authorities to block entrance to the bridge on both sides. While the ship is clearly at fault, I have to place additional blame on the port authority for continuing to allow vehicles to cross the bridge."

That assumes assets in place[on the ready] to block both directions.

We're talking about a .gov entity here.
Originally Posted by steve4102
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/MIyJgN0NYhs?si=RzUTuF8UDKS67BlL[/video]


Intensional, watch the video
First off, you should really learn to spell “intentional”.
Posted By: SKane Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional

It's hard to tell from the video, but the initial power failure occurred while the vessel was still a considerable distance from the bridge. If they had a little rudder on, that could have put their trajectory into the bridge.

And I'm sure, as reported, they also had to clear other vessel traffic prior to - means they're not dead nuts middle of the road.



Taint Steve's MO to let pragmatism, facts and experience get in the way of his beliefs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
I saw several explosions on several different videos from several different angles so I’m withholding my opinion…
Originally Posted by Raeford
"And the ship hailed mayday and indicated a possible collision before this video. Even if it was just 10 minutes before the start of this video, that's enough time for authorities to block entrance to the bridge on both sides. While the ship is clearly at fault, I have to place additional blame on the port authority for continuing to allow vehicles to cross the bridge."

That assumes assets in place[on the ready] to block both directions.

We're talking about a .gov entity here.
Most bridges don’t have a traffic control crew at the ready on either end a 2 in the morning.
I like the reporter that ask the question . . . . . . . . ."Was this a structural integrity problem with the bridge?" . . . . . . . . .WTF, Dumbass.
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
I saw several explosions on several different videos from several different angles so I’m withholding my opinion…

Looked like tranformers poppin to my untrained eye and I bet there were a few power lines running in the bridge.

Any way, the NTSB has not yet been aboard the ship per presser a few minutes ago.

I wish I had the hind sight to start a bridge building company in Baltimore a few weeks ago. Suppressor are kinda going bonkers but I bet emergency bridge building is quite lucrative.

There will be more than one billionare made rebuilding that bridge and Biden has promised the Spice will flow.
Posted By: Morewood Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Maritime job placement company BalticShipping shows the captain of the container ship is a Ukranian.
[img]https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-p...es/2024-03-26_14-16-56.png?itok=0uE6kh_o[/img]
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
I saw several explosions on several different videos from several different angles so I’m withholding my opinion…

Looked like tranformers poppin to my untrained eye and I bet there were a few power lines running in the bridge.

Any way, the NTSB has not yet been aboard the ship per presser a few minutes ago.

I wish I had the hind sight to start a bridge building company in Baltimore a few weeks ago. Suppressor are kinda going bonkers but I bet emergency bridge building is quite lucrative.

There will be more than one billionare made rebuilding that bridge and Biden has promised the Spice will flow.
No fuggin way I’m driving over a bridge you had anything to do with building!
Originally Posted by mirage243
I like the reporter that ask the question . . . . . . . . ."Was this a structural integrity problem with the bridge?" . . . . . . . . .WTF, Dumbass.
Impact exceeded design specs.
Originally Posted by Morewood
Maritime job placement company BalticShipping shows the captain of the container ship is a Ukranian.
[img]https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-p...es/2024-03-26_14-16-56.png?itok=0uE6kh_o[/img]


[Linked Image from media.tenor.com]
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
I saw several explosions on several different videos from several different angles so I’m withholding my opinion…

Are you thinking CGI or the Rothschilds?
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/MIyJgN0NYhs?si=RzUTuF8UDKS67BlL[/video]


Intensional, watch the video
First off, you should really learn to spell “intentional”.

I don’t think he has any intension of such.
Posted By: Raeford Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
[Linked Image from media.tenor.com]

Much like the truck....that hit you face first?

Or the Cheeto's & Donuts?
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
I saw several explosions on several different videos from several different angles so I’m withholding my opinion…

Looked like tranformers poppin to my untrained eye and I bet there were a few power lines running in the bridge.

Any way, the NTSB has not yet been aboard the ship per presser a few minutes ago.

I wish I had the hind sight to start a bridge building company in Baltimore a few weeks ago. Suppressor are kinda going bonkers but I bet emergency bridge building is quite lucrative.

There will be more than one billionare made rebuilding that bridge and Biden has promised the Spice will flow.


Greybull bridge builders....
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
The beauty of conspiracies is it absolves you of any accountability for the events of your own life.

Always the boogey man that kept you from being what you wanted or doing what you liked.

When that's your world lens - it's how EVERYTHING must happen otherwise your ego and world collapses. You have to take accountability.

"Hey did you hear about the Jewish cyber-attack that made my milk expire while I was on vacation?"
Posted By: Pat85 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
There will be more than one billionare made rebuilding that bridge and Biden has promised the Spice will flow.

The companys allowed to to bid on that project will already be at least 1/2 billion liquid.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/MIyJgN0NYhs?si=RzUTuF8UDKS67BlL[/video]


Intensional, watch the video
First off, you should really learn to spell “intentional”.

I don’t think he has any intension of such.


All of this back an forth is increasing my tention level.
Originally Posted by Teal
The beauty of conspiracies is it absolves you of any accountability for the events of your own life.

Always the boogey man that kept you from being what you wanted or doing what you liked.

When that's your world lens - it's how EVERYTHING must happen otherwise your ego and world collapses. You have to take accountability.

"Hey did you hear about the Jewish cyber-attack that made my milk expire while I was on vacation?"

This thread needs some Jag in it.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Teal
The beauty of conspiracies is it absolves you of any accountability for the events of your own life.

Always the boogey man that kept you from being what you wanted or doing what you liked.

When that's your world lens - it's how EVERYTHING must happen otherwise your ego and world collapses. You have to take accountability.

"Hey did you hear about the Jewish cyber-attack that made my milk expire while I was on vacation?"

This thread needs some Jag in it.

He's in a bunker, getting the 411 direct from Q-bert. I'm sure he's sure it's a directed energy weapon that just LOOKED like a ship.
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by Raeford
"And the ship hailed mayday and indicated a possible collision before this video. Even if it was just 10 minutes before the start of this video, that's enough time for authorities to block entrance to the bridge on both sides. While the ship is clearly at fault, I have to place additional blame on the port authority for continuing to allow vehicles to cross the bridge."

That assumes assets in place[on the ready] to block both directions.

We're talking about a .gov entity here.

Yes, yes, yes, we are dealing with .gov here. So full sentiment on your thoughts. A quick thinking captain, harbor pilot, coast guard...could have called 911 and said block the bridge entrances with cop cars, fire trucks, garbage trucks, anything that a city had on the local streets that time of night. Watching it happen reminds me of the Austin Powers seen where he runs from the steamroller. Clearly this wasn't a super sudden situation and there was time to put some safety provisions in place. Geez, if the blocked just one side the bridge, that would be half as many people involved.
Posted By: 2ndwind Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by ldholton
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Wow.... nice work... that image leave a mark.
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Morewood
Maritime job placement company BalticShipping shows the captain of the container ship is a Ukranian.
[img]https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-p...es/2024-03-26_14-16-56.png?itok=0uE6kh_o[/img]
if that's true it won't be long until the liberals are hollering it was the Russians that hijacked it or some [bleep]
Posted By: Tyrone Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
[video:youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/MIyJgN0NYhs?si=RzUTuF8UDKS67BlL[/video]


Intensional, watch the video
First off, you should really learn to spell “intentional”.

I don’t think he has any intension of such.
His mangling of English is as shocking as running into a high tention line!
Posted By: Joezone Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Some good info on the incident

Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Clearly, the only thing to do is send another $60 billion to Ukraine.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
ATTENTION

We can't spend our $$$$$ on bridge upkeep! Those $$$$$ must go to Ukraine!!

The Putin Pufters psychosis is on full display. Some of them blame Ukraine for evey thing wrong in their lives.

From the video it looks like they got the traffic stopped before the ship hit.

Wonder how long to get the channel open with all that metal/roadway on the bottom?

Is the ship in danger of sinking?

Is Mayor Pete back on maternity leave?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
I doubt the ship is in danger of sinking. It's likely a double hull with a crash bulkhead and good compartmentalization to prevent progressive flooding.

Thanks Coastie.

They sure seem fast to claim it was just an accident. It probably was a mishap but if someone had done sabotage would this not be a predictable result of losing steerage/power while upstream of the bridge?

John, I am too far removed from that aspect of shipping to be able to give a qualified answer.

Shooting from the hip, I think it would be very hard for an outsider to sabotage the ship in a way that the sabotage wouldn't become apparent until that point in their voyage. Internal sabotage? Possible I suppose, but still shooting from the hip. I have a hunch that angle will be well investigated.



Anyone know why or how a larger container ship can lose power and lose steering capabilities??

No immediate gen back up
Usually there are only 2 main generating plants, but all power is routed through the main bus ....any failure of a switch, relay, overload trip, or phase sync trip, can kill all power. The half century of automation to eliminate labor/crew has a downside. Engine crew used to have enough staff to constantly patrol and were right there...they could immediately react...perhaps holding a failed component in place manually with an insulated hotstick. Nowadays an engineering officer on watch is notified by computer or the power going off...a lot of time wasted responding...time a ship may not have.
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot

For most of the time - it doesn't have power or steerage. When it does, it went full astern (the smoke is this ship basically rolling coal to do so) and without steering in reverse on a single screw vessel - prop walked the boat. Stern goes to port - lining up the ship and drift forward into the pilling.

Human error.
Posted By: gunchamp Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
I find it amusing that some of you couldnt possibly imagine this not being an accident. There currently is not enough info out there for me to form a good opinion yet, but after all the insanity we have seen in the past few years, anything is possible. This could be cyber or lord knows what. Could just be a bad accident as well. Laughing off either possibility is very short sighted
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky


Learned from the Evergreen mishaps.
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot
I noticed it more in this video than the first one..

https://x.com/DCNewsLive/status/1772548737904107848?s=20
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles

I sailed up through Norfolk a few times. No bridges on the Hampton end but huge ships come barreling through there in and out on their own constantly. The only tugs I saw were escorting a submarine and pushing me out of the channel.
Let's see , when those passenger rail cars always crash or they're going too fast on a corner and ends up being a gay guy arguing with his lover and in the end .. maybe
the harbor pilot was pizzed at his lover... with all the diversity they could hire that female engineer crew out of Florida that built the pedestrian bridge that fell and they could get right on it and Old Pete butt plug could be in charge. Everyone go home they got this!
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by gunchamp
I find it amusing that some of you couldnt possibly imagine this not being an accident. There currently is not enough info out there for me to form a good opinion yet, but after all the insanity we have seen in the past few years, anything is possible. This could be cyber or lord knows what. Could just be a bad accident as well. Laughing off either possibility is very short sighted

The prevailing thought has been that it's anything BUT an accident. Some people, believing it's an accident, realize that it's unlikely that the engine room was "hacked" to stop ships power and then EXPERTLY rode momentum and currents to create a collision to take out a bridge at the BEST possible time of day to do so for mitigating loss of life. They did this knowing eventually power would come back on and reactions would ensure a collision after. They couldn't plan on her sinking as she only has 10 feet from keel to the bed - she's not gonna disappear under the waves....

The MAN 55,000 hp powerplant has Wi-fi and internet connectivity that opens it up for hacking - I'm sure.

They want to "attack" as retribution for whatever but not hurt anyone - makes sense.
Posted By: richj Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
asian muzzys (alum hat on)
Originally Posted by Aagaardsporter
I appreciate the clear headed comments and link from Teal, Gnoahh, and some others. I've been over the Key Bridge a couple of times and appreciate Gnoahh's trepidation on the crossing. As on our Mackinac Bridge (da Bridge) the driver doesn't get to admire the adjacent views.

Regardless of whether the Dali is diesel, diesel electric, or steam turbine electric powered, the propulsion, rudder, and bow thruster controls from the bridge would be electrical/electronic and subject to failure from the two apparent power outages. Both indicators and control devices for propulsion and steering would malfunction.
Wife took me to Northern Michigan last year. The Mackinac Bridge, much to her chagrin, was the highlight to me. That is an impressive structure! She was also pissed when visiting Las Vegas that my main interest was the Hoover Dam.
Posted By: JakeM78 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional


Why didn't your mother insist on a condom? THAT is the elephant in the room.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot

For most of the time - it doesn't have power or steerage. When it does, it went full astern (the smoke is this ship basically rolling coal to do so) and without steering in reverse on a single screw vessel - prop walked the boat. Stern goes to port - lining up the ship and drift forward into the pilling.

Human error.

It absolutely could be a combination of mechanical failure and human error.

At this point nobody knows and NTSB has not been aboard the ship.

Anyone, including the FBI, claiming to "know" what happened is wrong right now even if their guess turns out to be correct.

There are plenty of reasons why plenty of persons are having a very good day today.
Posted By: gunchamp Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by gunchamp
I find it amusing that some of you couldnt possibly imagine this not being an accident. There currently is not enough info out there for me to form a good opinion yet, but after all the insanity we have seen in the past few years, anything is possible. This could be cyber or lord knows what. Could just be a bad accident as well. Laughing off either possibility is very short sighted

The prevailing thought has been that it's anything BUT an accident. Some people, believing it's an accident, realize that it's unlikely that the engine room was "hacked" to stop ships power and then EXPERTLY rode momentum and currents to create a collision to take out a bridge at the BEST possible time of day to do so for mitigating loss of life. They did this knowing eventually power would come back on and reactions would ensure a collision after. They couldn't plan on her sinking as she only has 10 feet from keel to the bed - she's not gonna disappear under the waves....

The MAN 55,000 hp powerplant has Wi-fi and internet connectivity that opens it up for hacking - I'm sure.

They want to "attack" as retribution for whatever but not hurt anyone - makes sense.
I dont know alot about shipping or ships in general. You may be absolutely correct. I just question everything these days. Too many odd things happening
Posted By: gunchamp Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?
Posted By: ldholton Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by atvalaska
Originally Posted by ldholton
I watched both views of that impact from behind and from in front. it certainly look like it was steered into the pillar to me..
I watch twice.... perfectly lined up on the pillar... Hell even the camera was in the right spot

For most of the time - it doesn't have power or steerage. When it does, it went full astern (the smoke is this ship basically rolling coal to do so) and without steering in reverse on a single screw vessel - prop walked the boat. Stern goes to port - lining up the ship and drift forward into the pilling.

Human error.
I don't doubt or disagree with what Teal is said here. just from my observation and said looks like. that video will cause conspiracy theories for the next hundred years.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?

I'd think like anything else, you'd have to prove impairment (drunk/drugs) or gross negligence/malpractice - ignoring all protocol etc.

I do not know if their insurance has a deductible lol.
Posted By: gunchamp Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?

I'd think like anything else, you'd have to prove impairment (drunk/drugs) or gross negligence/malpractice - ignoring all protocol etc.

I do not know if their insurance has a deductible lol.
Kind of what I figured. Ive heard they have not located everyone missing yet, so with water temps in the 40s, my guess is there will be a few casualties sadly. Wonder if that will impact who gets the blame for this
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Step 1 - reroute surface traffic and develop a new Hazmat/OS/OD route.
Step 2 - clear the river and get the docks open and going again
Step 3 - rebuild the bridge, likely with precautions like dolphins (not the animal) before the bridge supports both in and outbound.

The blame game will happen concurrently to all of those I bet. Just thinking of it as a project to get through. I'm sure they have local salvage and diver crews - Roen won't be chugging out from Sturgeon Bay here...
Posted By: 2ndwind Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/...-fishy-yet-again-latest-details-presser/

The "It was not an accident" thread.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?
The senior pilot is the captain during the period they are contracted for, it is very respectful, but 99 times out of 100, the ships captain keeps his mouth shut..and is often not much more than a translator when languages are a problem.
I got one side of the story once working on a docking assist at Bremerton/Kitsap Naval Base, a Navy Captain countermanded the order of the pilot...the skipper on the tug I was on balked at the order of the naval captain...the pilot told my skipper he had been relieved and please enter that with the correct time in the tug's log. Very tense but polite..no voices raised on the radio. Normally the navy has their own tugs. The navy ship damaged about 60 ft of pier and a small forest of piling with some hull damage to her stern. I don't know who ended up paying, but we never docked another naval vessel while I was there. The pilot continued to dock tankers and containerships successfully for another 12 years until he retired. I suspect my company didn't think the little bit of navy work was worth the hassle.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
I, as well as everyone I know here is still is still in shock. From what I understand, the pilot did get on the horn to shore authorities the instant it became apparent that the ship was going to hit. The authorities, who we locals refer to as "the bridge cops" (MTA cops responsible for all the bridges in the Bay region) who did immediately choke off traffic onto the bridge. The vehicles seen in the videos were merely stragglers who scooted through in the last second, it's unclear if any of them took the plunge. (The videos show only a couple vehicles moving on the bridge - which even at that time of night is usually damned near bumper to bumper.) The vehicles that went in the drink were seemingly work vehicles of the maintenance crew standing on the bridge, as were most if not all, of the people who went down. It would seem that the emergency response was prompt and effective, sparing a whole lot more souls from a grizzly end. You gotta remember this ship was moving at a snail's pace, a big irresistible force, but a snail's pace nonetheless.

The main question I have is why didn't the maintenance crew get the word to drop what they're doing and scoot. Maybe they did and simply didn't react fast enough, who knows - we may never know.

I knew when this thread started that the conspiracy theorists and "Chicken Littles" would jump to conclusions and start promulgating wild ideas based entirely on gut feelings, scant information, and prejudices. Hell, they may well be right at the end of the day but it bears keeping quiet about it until the facts are in - if for no other reason than to honor the poor bastards who lost their lives.
Gnoahh,
My first guess would be the workers were overlooked.
In an extreme emergency the traffic would be the first though.
Someone may have nightmares for years over that normal oversight.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by Dillonbuck
Gnoahh,
My first guess would be the workers were overlooked.
In an extreme emergency the traffic would be the first though.
Someone may have nightmares for years over that normal oversight.

Yep - I'm sure some will be up nights. Might be they also assumed the workers would "see the ship coming!" and bail. But that's not likely, I mean, they've got mind/hands on task - no over the side.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Indeed.
Posted By: gunchamp Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by milespatton
Admittedly, I know nothing about ships, a little about river barges, quite a bit about inland fishing boats, But,I still have trouble understanding why the tow boats are not required all of the way to the ocean, with a ship that size. miles
And this my friends is the key to the whole mess...the shipowners have fought this forever, it's all about the money...within seconds the pilots could have had 12,000 hp guiding the disabled hulk through the bridge footings.

Many are going to learn that it's the companies with cargo on the ship that crashed into the bridge that will pay the damages, not the ship owner or ship operator. That's because of ancient maritime law (older than the US constitution) called "General Average" designed to prevent sailors from fighting over which cargo to toss overboard, and instead to focus on saving the ship. Per Ryan Peterson.

Blog post/linky

Actually - speaking with more people - to clarify, damages to the vessel and cargo are covered under “general average”—paid by the cargo owners and their insurance companies. The bridge and other external damages will be covered by the property insurance of the ship operator.
If it is an accident, does any blame or penalties fall on the captain?
The senior pilot is the captain during the period they are contracted for, it is very respectful, but 99 times out of 100, the ships captain keeps his mouth shut..and is often not much more than a translator when languages are a problem.
I got one side of the story once working on a docking assist at Bremerton/Kitsap Naval Base, a Navy Captain countermanded the order of the pilot...the skipper on the tug I was on balked at the order of the naval captain...the pilot told my skipper he had been relieved and please enter that with the correct time in the tug's log. Very tense but polite..no voices raised on the radio. Normally the navy has their own tugs. The navy ship damaged about 60 ft of pier and a small forest of piling with some hull damage to her stern. I don't know who ended up paying, but we never docked another naval vessel while I was there. The pilot continued to dock tankers and containerships successfully for another 12 years until he retired. I suspect my company didn't think the little bit of navy work was worth the hassle.
Interesting and thank you for the post
Posted By: wabigoon Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Trojacek
My tensonal Lebel bees sumwhut esxepsonal sxasperated cuz of dish hapsunal ebent! Butt us Kant spen no $$$$ on da bride upket ft cuz wee got sen dem $$$$$ to urbankane!
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
I saw several explosions on several different videos from several different angles so I’m withholding my opinion…

Are you thinking CGI or the Rothschilds?

Neither. It was Jooish space lasers.
Posted By: WYcoyote Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Connect the dots, people.

This was an obvious attack by Putin to retaliate for the CIA Moscow concert hall massacre.
Funny as hell, not nearly as catastrophic as the collapse of Baltimore’s education system among many other things 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Posted By: ribka Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Lots of coal stuck in the port

Look at CEIX stock. Might be a buy
Posted By: JakeM78 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/26/24
Originally Posted by gnoahhh
I, as well as everyone I know here is still is still in shock. From what I understand, the pilot did get on the horn to shore authorities the instant it became apparent that the ship was going to hit. The authorities, who we locals refer to as "the bridge cops" (MTA cops responsible for all the bridges in the Bay region) who did immediately choke off traffic onto the bridge. The vehicles seen in the videos were merely stragglers who scooted through in the last second, it's unclear if any of them took the plunge. (The videos show only a couple vehicles moving on the bridge - which even at that time of night is usually damned near bumper to bumper.) The vehicles that went in the drink were seemingly work vehicles of the maintenance crew standing on the bridge, as were most if not all, of the people who went down. It would seem that the emergency response was prompt and effective, sparing a whole lot more souls from a grizzly end. You gotta remember this ship was moving at a snail's pace, a big irresistible force, but a snail's pace nonetheless.

The main question I have is why didn't the maintenance crew get the word to drop what they're doing and scoot. Maybe they did and simply didn't react fast enough, who knows - we may never know.

I knew when this thread started that the conspiracy theorists and "Chicken Littles" would jump to conclusions and start promulgating wild ideas based entirely on gut feelings, scant information, and prejudices. Hell, they may well be right at the end of the day but it bears keeping quiet about it until the facts are in - if for no other reason than to honor the poor bastards who lost their lives.


And damn good for them to get it shut off so fast. I'm sure one of those cars was a 'f'k it, I'm going'. I'm glad they did their job well and that it wasn't 8am.
Originally Posted by JohnnyLoco
Funny as hell, not nearly as catastrophic as the collapse of Baltimore’s education system among many other things 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Truth!!!
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by gunchamp
I find it amusing that some of you couldnt possibly imagine this not being an accident. There currently is not enough info out there for me to form a good opinion yet, but after all the insanity we have seen in the past few years, anything is possible. This could be cyber or lord knows what. Could just be a bad accident as well. Laughing off either possibility is very short sighted

The prevailing thought has been that it's anything BUT an accident. Some people, believing it's an accident, realize that it's unlikely that the engine room was "hacked" to stop ships power and then EXPERTLY rode momentum and currents to create a collision to take out a bridge at the BEST possible time of day to do so for mitigating loss of life. They did this knowing eventually power would come back on and reactions would ensure a collision after. They couldn't plan on her sinking as she only has 10 feet from keel to the bed - she's not gonna disappear under the waves....

The MAN 55,000 hp powerplant has Wi-fi and internet connectivity that opens it up for hacking - I'm sure.

They want to "attack" as retribution for whatever but not hurt anyone - makes sense.
I dont know alot about shipping or ships in general. You may be absolutely correct. I just question everything these days. Too many odd things happening

Democrats keep introducing legislation to put government controlled kill switches in new vehicles. Why couldn't a foreign government hack a kill switch into the ship?
Posted By: SupFoo Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
Posted By: Longbob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by Swamplord
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]

Looks like he is singing "Oh say can you see, that bridge coming at me...."
Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by Swamplord
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]

Looks like he is singing "Oh say can you see, that bridge coming at me...."

Or, “I’m Popeye the sailor man”.
In 5 more pages people will be saying the saw flashes from demolition charges.
Posted By: rod2024 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Stop with the rumors
Since there’s no sign of Jag, I’ll post this…



From Telegram:

Lara Logan (https://x.com/laralogan/status/1772675651599770093?s=46) on Baltimore Bridge Collapse

Multiple intel sources: Baltimore bridge collapse was an “absolutely brilliant strategic attack” on US critical infrastructure - most likely cyber - & our intel agencies know it. In information warfare terms, they just divided the US along the Mason Dixon line exactly like the Civil War.

Second busiest strategic roadway in the nation for hazardous material now down for 4-5 years - which is how long they say it will take to recover. Bridge was built specifically to move hazardous material - fuel, diesel, propane gas, nitrogen, highly flammable materials, chemicals and oversized cargo that cannot fit in the tunnels - that supply chain now crippled.

Make no mistake: this was an extraordinary attack in terms of planning, timing & execution.

The two critical components on that bridge are the two load-bearing pylons on each end, closest to the shore. They are bigger, thicker and deeper than anything else. These are the anchor points and they knew that hitting either one one of them would be a fatal wound to the integrity of the bridge.

Half a mile of bridge went in the river - likely you will have to build a new one. Also caused so much damage to the structural integrity of the bottom concrete part that you cannot see & won’t know until they take the wreckage apart. Structural destruction likely absolute.

Attack perfectly targeted.

“They have figured out how to bring us down. As long as you stay away from the teeth of the US military, you can pick the US apart. We are arrogant and ignorant - lethal combination. Obama said they would fundamentally change America and they did. We are in a free-fall ride on a roller coaster right now - no brakes - just picking up speed.”

The footage shows the cargo ship never got in the approach lane in the channel. You have to be in the channel before you get into that turn. Location was precise/deliberate: chose a bend in the river where you have to slow down and commit yourself - once you are committed in that area there is not enough room to maneuver.

Should have had a harbor pilot to pilot the boat. You are not supposed to traverse any obstacles without the harbor pilot.

They chose a full moon so they would have maximum tidal shift - rise and fall. Brisk flow in that river on a normal day & have had a lot of rain recently so water was already moving along at a good pace.

Hit it with enough kinetic energy to knock the load-bearing pylon out from under the highway - which fatally weakens the span and then 50 percent of the bridge fell into the water.

All these factors when you look at it  - this is how you teach people how to do this type of attack and there are so few people left in the system who know this. We have a Junior varsity team on the field.

Tremendous navigational obstruction. Huge logistical nightmare to clean this up. Number of dead is tragic but not the whole measure of the attack.

That kind-of bridge constantly under repair - always at night because there is so much traffic and they cannot obstruct that during the day. So concern is for repair guys who were on foot (out of their vehicles) working who may now be in the water - 48 degrees at most at this time of year.

When you choke off Baltimore you have cut the main north-south hazardous corridor (I95) in half. Now has to go around the city - or go somewhere else.

To move some of that cargo through the tunnel you may be able to get a permit but those are slow to get and require an escort system that is expensive and has to be done at night.

For every $100 dollars that goes into the city, $12 comes from shipping. Believe this will cripple the city of Baltimore at a time when they do not hav
e the resources to recover.

@lauralogan

@Brandenburh4Mi
dis what FJB be saying

[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
Posted By: Malcolm Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
" We'll just use the current to propell us down river and start the engines after we heat up the water jacket. It' ll be a piece of cake and we can shove off early."
At least two previous episodes of loss of control- - - -backed into a dock, and hit something else, with damage to the ship both times. Either the crew sucks, or the thing is an unreliable floating junk heap- - - -maybe both!
I watched a show once that showed a different pilot was always brought aboard to navigate through channels as the ship came into harbor. Was this the case here?
The ship was only drifting because it lost power.
That's not unheard of, it was just at a bad time and place.



Ships don't "have crews".
Crews are employees, but also kind of free agents.
Individually, they sign contracts for a period of time. 90 days...ish.
They fly in wherever they are gonna meet the ship, and relieve the outgoing member.
Who then flies home.
Crew members constantly rotate. In small numbers, so that there is never a new
crew. Or an old one.

Mariners, work through a union or a big company. They aren't attached to a ship
for any longer than a contract. A 20 year old guy could work a lifetime and never end up on his first ship again. Or, could see it often.

There is a very good chance that there were completely different crews on the ship for every incident. Just one of the reasons sailors believe in bad ships.



It had tugs were normally needed.
It had two pilots.
Tugs along side may have saved it, 10 pilots can't re-power a drifting ship in two minutes.
I'd bet tugs will be required near certain Baltimore bridges in the future.

This ain't hard.
Unless poor maintenance is found, this was an accident.








If you belive everything we see and hear.
Originally Posted by rod2024
Stop with the rumors

Go fist yourself.
Posted By: robthom Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Not wanting to pour cold water on your fun but my professional civil structural engineering experience of over 20 years indicates a mixture of

Ignoring procedures , method statements / cutting corners

Poor maintenance

Poor training / inexperienced people "at the coal face"

Bad luck : several bad things happen together or closely spaced : Swiss Cheese concept but should be planned for.

Any vessel that size is not suddenly going to stop or turn / change direction even if it had full power - conservation of linear momentum.

Take away power, hence steerage capability they are going to be stuffed: everyone / thing else needs to get out of their way.

I am a believer in cick up theory until no reasonable doubt exists for malign, external influences.
Originally Posted by Fishnnut1
I watched a show once that showed a different pilot was always brought aboard to navigate through channels as the ship came into harbor. Was this the case here?
That's standard procedure in most ports in the world. It's been that way for a long time. Big ports are just too complicated and conjested to be navigated by someone who isn't very familiar with them.
Lara Logan with video.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/lara-logan-francis-scott-key-bridge-collapse-everyone/
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
The critical thinker says "If you knew, within minutes it was a cyber attack of a boat - why didn't you stop it? You had to have been able to see it happen to know and also to have, somehow or for some reason been monitoring the Dali specifically and didn't stop it? Is that what you're admitting to? Or is it more likely that it wasn't a cyber attack because what we saw - can't be done via "cyber" and you're simply a hack journalist looking for the boogey man at every turn."


Quote
I’m talking to people who are on the inside, some who are on active duty, some who are retired. And everyone, literally, from critical infrastructure in the Department of Homeland Security to the intelligence agencies, they know there’s no other… This is a cyber attack on a critical infrastructure corridor for the United States.
Those that knew it was an attack before the damage was done, didn’t want to stop it.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Because when you go full astern on power with a single screw vessel - there's no steering but the prop walks the stern to port. Physics. Pilot/helm panicked, went full aft to avoid what they saw was coming and made it worse. Drift forward then into the support.

That's per a Navy helmsman and other sea guys I talked to yesterday.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by steve4102
Those that knew it was an attack before the damage was done, didn’t want to stop it.

I love how everything and everyone keeps ruining your life with absolutely zero proof.

Have you EVER in any respect worked in or for a .gov intelligence agency? Any experience at all? Critical thinking isn't on display with you very often, why I ask.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Because when you go full astern on power with a single screw vessel - there's no steering but the prop walks the stern to port. Physics. Pilot/helm panicked, went full aft to avoid what they saw was coming and made it worse. Drift forward then into the support.

That's per a Navy helmsman and other sea guys I talked to yesterday.

Okay, maybe. But what did he see coming and why did he panic? I mean they hit that pillar square in the middle of the bow. That means that if they had done nothing they would have slid right under that bridge.

I mean the pilots are all professionals who have made this run thousands of times most likely right? They are the best trained people on earth with regard to this sort of thing and know that port and harbor better than you know your living room, right? I’m not saying it’s not an accident, but I would like to hear from the pilot in charge what happened and why, if he panicked, he did so in a way to make sure the damage was the absolute worst it could be.

Apparently, Baltimore is a uniquely important port with regard to bulk and industrial shipping on the east coast.

And by the way, if port is left and starboard is right, then thatvbow went to the starboard side as giewed from the perspective of the pilot.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
How many times do you think that pilot did that work while losing power 2x in the middle of maneuver?

As I mentioned at the start of this - tried to cut it short and inside instead of going wide and around and got hang chow. PROBABLY thought that was better and concerned about becoming a wide block in the channel like the Evergreen was. Made a choice - made the WRONG choice - it happens. The choice wasn't executed the way they thought - again, single screw is less than ideal for such a maneuver.

They likely thought that if he's going to become a problem, he wanted to be a problem on the side not in the middle. No one expected to take the entire bridge out - don't care what steve says.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by JoeBob
And by the way, if port is left and starboard is right, then thatvbow went to the starboard side as giewed from the perspective of the pilot.

Exactly as I said - full reverse on a single screw prop walks the ship's stern to port - pushing the bow starboard in perspective.
Originally Posted by Teal
Because when you go full astern on power with a single screw vessel - there's no steering but the prop walks the stern to port. Physics. Pilot/helm panicked, went full aft to avoid what they saw was coming and made it worse. Drift forward then into the support.

That's per a Navy helmsman and other sea guys I talked to yesterday.


Interesting Teal. Just so I understand better:

“Full astern” mean full reverse?

If so, why does that walk the stern to the left side? Is it because of the location of the prop, the direction it is spinning, or something else?

Also, was the steering out, but the prop was functioning? I haven’t seen any clear reports on that.

Just trying to understand better.
Originally Posted by Teal
How many times do you think that pilot did that work while losing power 2x in the middle of maneuver?

That's what I was thinking too. The pilot might be a pretty good helmsman and knows where to maneuver in those particular waters, but that doesn't mean that he skillfully knows how to steer that particular ship when some of it is not working.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by MarineHawk
Originally Posted by Teal
Because when you go full astern on power with a single screw vessel - there's no steering but the prop walks the stern to port. Physics. Pilot/helm panicked, went full aft to avoid what they saw was coming and made it worse. Drift forward then into the support.

That's per a Navy helmsman and other sea guys I talked to yesterday.


Interesting Teal. Just so I understand better:

“Full astern” mean full reverse?

If so, why does that walk the stern to the left side? Is it because of the location of the prop, the direction it is spinning, or something else?

Also, was the steering out, but the prop was functioning? I haven’t seen any clear reports on that.

Just trying to understand better.

They lost power - putting them in a drift, power comes on, smoke goes out as they slam full astern (roll coal) but that doesn't provide steering.

Yes - full astern means full reverse. The prop spins the other direction but doing so doesn't push any water over the rudder for steering. The spinning prop then spins the stern of the boat to port because of it's spin direction.

A twin screw boat can steer in reverse because one engine in reverse, one is forward - causing a pivot like a tank and one side IS pushing water over a rudder for control.
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Originally Posted by Teal
They lost power - putting them in a drift, power comes on, smoke goes out as they slam full astern (roll coal) but that doesn't provide steering.

Yes - full astern means full reverse. The prop spins the other direction but doing so doesn't push any water over the rudder for steering. The spinning prop then spins the stern of the boat to port because of it's spin direction.

A twin screw boat can steer in reverse because one engine in reverse, one is forward - causing a pivot like a tank and one side IS pushing water over a rudder for control.

Interesting. Thanks for the response.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by MarineHawk
Originally Posted by Teal
Because when you go full astern on power with a single screw vessel - there's no steering but the prop walks the stern to port. Physics. Pilot/helm panicked, went full aft to avoid what they saw was coming and made it worse. Drift forward then into the support.

That's per a Navy helmsman and other sea guys I talked to yesterday.


Interesting Teal. Just so I understand better:

“Full astern” mean full reverse?

If so, why does that walk the stern to the left side? Is it because of the location of the prop, the direction it is spinning, or something else?

Also, was the steering out, but the prop was functioning? I haven’t seen any clear reports on that.

Just trying to understand better.

They lost power - putting them in a drift, power comes on, smoke goes out as they slam full astern (roll coal) but that doesn't provide steering.

Yes - full astern means full reverse. The prop spins the other direction but doing so doesn't push any water over the rudder for steering. The spinning prop then spins the stern of the boat to port because of it's spin direction.

A twin screw boat can steer in reverse because one engine in reverse, one is forward - causing a pivot like a tank and one side IS pushing water over a rudder for control.

This from some Navy guys I talked to yesterday and some local guys here who made a living on the Great Lakes. I'm 90 and 30 minutes from Fincantierti Marine's 2 shipyards here. We've got a lot of boat people in the area.
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

I've heard this a lot too - fuel explains the loss of power/mechanical failure that some people just are completely unable to understand DOES happen without a "cyber attack", while simultaneously bemoaning how expensive it is to fix their Ford in the driveway and Mercury OB on the bass boat. Never making the connection.
Originally Posted by wilkeshunter
The organization that I work for has facilities that regularly use this port. This will make things interesting for a while.

Agreed...

Lotta freight goes thru that Port.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.

Funny - you don't believe that intel community because of what you posted above but you DO believe that intel community telling some journalist exactly what you want to hear, possible or not. Because what NO ONE can explain is how a 55k hp engine got "hacked via cyber. They just claim it did.
Do t believe everything you think
Originally Posted by gnoahhh
I live at the intersection of Rt.50 and Rt.2/179, in the lower left quadrant of this map. I look out my 2nd floor down onto Rt.50 to the south about 200 yards away.

You can tell from this illustration how waterways (primarily the Chesapeake Bay and tributary rivers) dominate our local world. There are no straight lines "from here to there". This is the hard reality that'll dominate the coming traffic congestion due to the bridge collapse.

I hear ya...

I used to live aboard my ketch in Pasadena (Maryland Yacht Club)... traffic in your zone is gonna be a double fiasco for a long time I suspect.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.

Funny - you don't believe that intel community because of what you posted above but you DO believe that intel community telling some journalist exactly what you want to hear, possible or not. Because what NO ONE can explain is how a 55k hp engine got "hacked via cyber. They just claim it did.
Do t believe everything you think

I'll do me and be happy, you do you and blame the world for your inadequacies.

I find it interesting that exactly ZERO of my former intelligence co-workers, who continued working at the 3 letter agency that doesn't get named after I left said work - don't buy the cyber attack at all.
Here’s a clue,

The Biden Administration claimed there was no evidence of foul play, or terrorist activity, within a few hours of the collision.

That be some quick top notch investigators there, that God Biden and his Administration are that good.
Originally Posted by steve4102
You guys are missing the elephant in the room.

Ok the lights went out, supposedly the ship lost control, ok fine, but…

Why was this ship being steered so close to the support in the first place. Why wasn’t this ship being steered dead center between the two supports from the get go.

There was no reason for this ship to be piloted this close to the support when there was schit tons of room available.

This was intensional

VERY NARROW and specific channel.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Once again... you are talking out of your ass Stevie Wonder...
Originally Posted by steve4102
Here’s a clue,

The Biden Administration claimed there was no evidence of foul play, or terrorist activity, within a few hours of the collision.

That be some quick top notch investigators there, that God Biden and his Administration are that good.
You ever own a boat? Electronics and water are not friends. Chit tears up on boats. Boats don’t have disc brakes.
Posted By: Tyrone Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
I thought the loop the ship made when it first got underway was strange, but that map explains the course completely.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
I thought the loop the ship made when it first got underway was strange, but that map explains the course completely.

Exactly... The navigation is damn tricky...

This video was the Evergreen grounding 2 year ago near Annapolis... I think it took over a month to get her free.

Cargo ship mapping on the bay... Zoom out to see nationwide stuff.

http://www.shiptraffic.net/marine-traffic/bays/Chesapeake_Bay
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.
Originally Posted by steve4102
Here’s a clue,

The Biden Administration claimed there was no evidence of foul play, or terrorist activity, within a few hours of the collision.

That be some quick top notch investigators there, that God Biden and his Administration are that good.

Biden is an idiot, but:

He spoke more than 11 hours after the incident; said that it appeared to be an accident; and said that "there is no other information that it was intentional."

He didn't say that everyone was 100% certain that it was not intentional at that point. He simply said that there was no information to suggest that it was intentional at that point. Without any information suggesting that it was intentional, most people are going to assume that a collision is accidental. Of course, just because green space aliens killed JFK, you can assume, if you want, that they also caused an unfortunate allision where the ship obviously had lost power.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.

Sure it does. But wouldn’t you like to hear from the pilot? Wouldn’t you like an actual explanation?
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.

Sure it does. But wouldn’t you like to hear from the pilot? Wouldn’t you like an actual explanation?

Sure. Why not? Until then, I’m not going around raving about some nutty conspiracy theory when a logical explanation fits better.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
I don’t know. You if this happened in the 1930s, therewould have been 200 reporters waiting on the pilot as soon as he set foot on the dock. We’d already have a statement from him and know at least what he said caused it. But now? Maybe if there are lawsuits we’ll get a deposition in five years IF the government decides it isn’t national security.

People decry conspiracy theories. Well, official secrecy breeds them.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by steve4102
I seem to remember an assassination several decades ago where our Intel agencies said “there is no proof”, “anyone that claims otherwise is a conspiracy nut” and poof like magic they lied.

I also seem to remember just a few short months ago that 50+ former US Intel operatives signed a letter stating that The Hunter Laptop was 100% Bullschit and Russian Disinformation, and poof like magic, there is proof and proof they lied.

So, you do you and believe our Deep State and our Intel Community is honest and chucked full of integrity.
Absolutely not. I don’t believe anything coming from them, but that doesn’t require me to believe something different from what I saw with my own eyes.

What did we see? It’s hard to say without knowing what went on. I mean if you look, the first turn towards the support happened immediately before the power went out the first time. Then the big one came immediately after it came back on. It looks to me like if the power had stayed off, it would have slid right under that bridge.

Once again, I don’t know what happen and an accident is the likeliest thing but looks can be deceiving and are heavily influenced by what you decide to believe. For instance, if you were in a car and someone hacked it and you couldn’t control the steering, what would you do? You know what you would do, you would try to put it in neutral or turn off the engine. So, what if the ship were hacked and the crew tried to turn off the power? Then, when the auxiliary power came back on, the hacker still had control and steered it into the pylons. I’m not saying that happened, but if it had, it would probably look like what we saw in that video.

I don’t know that any of this happened, but it could. We have the strongest military on earth but we are so vulnerable in so many ways. And as for a hacker knowing exactly what would happen or how the ship and crew would react, who says he did if it happened? I suspect that to the extent there is cyber frickery going on with our infrastructure, a lot of it is pretty random to just see it any damage can be done. For all we know, this could have been the fifteenth time in the last year something similar had happened but nothing bad happened until now. With our current government, I wouldn’t rely upon the to tell us or fix the problem.

I agree with you about our vunerabilities and about our dishonest government and press. All I’m saying is that if you’ve ever operated a boat, what we see happen in the video makes perfect sense for an equipment malfunction.

Sure it does. But wouldn’t you like to hear from the pilot? Wouldn’t you like an actual explanation?

Sure. Why not? Until then, I’m not going around raving about some nutty conspiracy theory when a logical explanation fits better.

Who is raving? I merely pointed out that what you “saw” could be explained differently.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
I don’t know. You if this happened in the 1930s, therewould have been 200 reporters waiting on the pilot as soon as he set foot on the dock. We’d already have a statement from him and know at least what he said caused it. But now? Maybe if there are lawsuits we’ll get a deposition in five years IF the government decides it isn’t national security.

People decry conspiracy theories. Well, official secrecy breeds them.
You do make a good point. I expect the shipping company wants to get his story straight before putting him in front of a camera and microphone. Hell, he may have been injured.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by JoeBob
I don’t know. You if this happened in the 1930s, therewould have been 200 reporters waiting on the pilot as soon as he set foot on the dock. We’d already have a statement from him and know at least what he said caused it. But now? Maybe if there are lawsuits we’ll get a deposition in five years IF the government decides it isn’t national security.

People decry conspiracy theories. Well, official secrecy breeds them.
You do make a good point. I expect the shipping company wants to get his story straight before putting him in front of a camera and microphone. Hell, he may have been injured.

Pilot works for the port.
Originally Posted by steve4102
Here’s a clue,

The Biden Administration claimed there was no evidence of foul play, or terrorist activity, within a few hours of the collision.

That be some quick top notch investigators there, that God Biden and his Administration are that good.

It doesn't take long and it doesn't take an "investigation" to ask the pilot if he saw any evidence of foul play does it?
Posted By: RufusG Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Current, tide, and wind can individually or jointly work to point the ship somewhere different than you want it to go, most especially after you lose propulsion. I'm recalling one time going out the channel to sea (maybe Kings Bay, not sure) and we had Standard rudder on just to crab in a straight line.
Posted By: slm9s Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Would bad fuel make the lights go out?
How similar is this to the container ship that got stuck in the Suez canal a while back? Did they ever find a real cause for that one?
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Current, tide, and wind can individually or jointly work to point the ship somewhere different than you want it to go, most especially after you lose propulsion. I'm recalling one time going out the channel to sea (maybe Kings Bay, not sure) and we had Standard rudder on just to crab in a straight line.

There are so many possible variables at play that it's simply not possible for us to draw any conclusions based on the information that we have. A transit is a continuous series of rudder corrections.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by steve4102
Here’s a clue,

The Biden Administration claimed there was no evidence of foul play, or terrorist activity, within a few hours of the collision.

That be some quick top notch investigators there, that God Biden and his Administration are that good.

It doesn't take long and it doesn't take an "investigation" to ask the pilot if he saw any evidence of foul play does it?

No, no, no.

Connect the dots here Paul.

The pilot is in on it. Think Rothschilds. Think Cabal. Think Jews. Think every possible nefarious explanation other than the most likely.

This is the campfire; after all.
Originally Posted by slm9s
Would bad fuel make the lights go out?

Merchant marine captain on the news explained that these ships have emergency generators that run off better fuel and can run the auxiliary items but cannot run the propulsion system.
.
Seems like they should have a couple of tugs running with the ship until all the tight maneuvering is done.
But that's added cost.
Posted By: RufusG Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Current, tide, and wind can individually or jointly work to point the ship somewhere different than you want it to go, most especially after you lose propulsion. I'm recalling one time going out the channel to sea (maybe Kings Bay, not sure) and we had Standard rudder on just to crab in a straight line.

There are so many possible variables at play that it's simply not possible for us to draw any conclusions based on the information that we have. A transit is a continuous series of rudder corrections.

I think it would be fun to be on the inside investigating, just because of the complexity, but yeah, hardly worth guessing at this point, there's so much hasn't been revealed.
Posted By: rod2024 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
mIm
Posted By: rod2024 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
You're an idiot
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Cargo ship mapping on the bay... Zoom out to see nationwide stuff.

http://www.shiptraffic.net/marine-traffic/bays/Chesapeake_Bay


Very interesting, thanks.
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Current, tide, and wind can individually or jointly work to point the ship somewhere different than you want it to go, most especially after you lose propulsion. I'm recalling one time going out the channel to sea (maybe Kings Bay, not sure) and we had Standard rudder on just to crab in a straight line.

There are so many possible variables at play that it's simply not possible for us to draw any conclusions based on the information that we have. A transit is a continuous series of rudder corrections.

I think it would be fun to be on the inside investigating, just because of the complexity, but yeah, hardly worth guessing at this point, there's so much hasn't been revealed.

The NTSB amazes me with how thorough they are with their investigations. Some years back a Coast Guard boat struck a recreational boat in the San Diego area, killing an 8 year old boy. I read the full NTSB report and was awed by how much they learned about not just the incident but CG culture and culture at the unit.
Posted By: Calvin Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by steve4102
Here’s a clue,

The Biden Administration claimed there was no evidence of foul play, or terrorist activity, within a few hours of the collision.

That be some quick top notch investigators there, that God Biden and his Administration are that good.

It doesn't take long and it doesn't take an "investigation" to ask the pilot if he saw any evidence of foul play does it?

No, no, no.

Connect the dots here Paul.

The pilot is in on it. Think Rothschilds. Think Cabal. Think Jews. Think every possible nefarious explanation other than the most likely.

This is the campfire; after all.

It’s starting to border on mental retardation.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by RufusG
Originally Posted by JoeBob
It’s apparent that if you watch the video that the ship made a pretty damned dramatic hard turn to hit that support. Why? I’m not saying it was on purpose or terrorism, but why? I mean if the ship was in the channel as alleged and from all the videos and diagrams I’ve seen it looks like once you are in the channel it’s a straight shot out. So, if you’re going straight in the channel and the power goes out, you’re likely to coast through and under the bridge if you do nothing. Presumably, the current in that spot is running out with the river, so it shouldn’t have caused that hard turn.

So for me, I would like to know why the hard turn? Because, it’s there if you watch.

Current, tide, and wind can individually or jointly work to point the ship somewhere different than you want it to go, most especially after you lose propulsion. I'm recalling one time going out the channel to sea (maybe Kings Bay, not sure) and we had Standard rudder on just to crab in a straight line.

There are so many possible variables at play that it's simply not possible for us to draw any conclusions based on the information that we have. A transit is a continuous series of rudder corrections.

I think it would be fun to be on the inside investigating, just because of the complexity, but yeah, hardly worth guessing at this point, there's so much hasn't been revealed.


Not really.

Investigator, “Mr, Pilot, what happened?”

From there, you’re going to get a pretty good idea. The whys and the wherefores concerning certain things might be complex, but the basic happenings should be pretty easy to tell pretty quickly.
The pure blood patriot derp squad have unsurprisingly stumbled upon yet another conspiracy.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
As far as I know there has been no official release of any info, right? We don’t even know that the power went out. Everyone is just assuming since the lights went out correct?

By now they have a basic understanding of what happened. They should release some preliminary details. Everyone knows that there is a lot of investigation to go, but by now they at least know what the pilot and crew say happened.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
As far as I know there has been no official release of any info, right? We don’t even know that the power went out. Everyone is just assuming since the lights went out correct?

By now they have a basic understanding of what happened. They should release some preliminary details. Everyone knows that there is a lot of investigation to go, but by now they at least know what the pilot and crew say happened.

What is the likelihood of a lawsuit or two stemming from this incident?
Posted By: Longbob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by JoeBob
As far as I know there has been no official release of any info, right? We don’t even know that the power went out. Everyone is just assuming since the lights went out correct?

By now they have a basic understanding of what happened. They should release some preliminary details. Everyone knows that there is a lot of investigation to go, but by now they at least know what the pilot and crew say happened.

Not sure if there is an official statement, but Maryland Governor Wes Moore has stated in interviews that the power went out on the ship.
Posted By: JoeBob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JoeBob
As far as I know there has been no official release of any info, right? We don’t even know that the power went out. Everyone is just assuming since the lights went out correct?

By now they have a basic understanding of what happened. They should release some preliminary details. Everyone knows that there is a lot of investigation to go, but by now they at least know what the pilot and crew say happened.

What is the likelihood of a lawsuit or two stemming from this incident?

People died, insurance companies are going to pay billions, there will be a dozen at least.
Posted By: wabigoon Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Any idea of replacement cost?
Posted By: NVhntr Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
A buck two ninty eight
Originally Posted by wabigoon
Any idea of replacement cost?

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: WYcoyote Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
The fire conspiracy theorists have their tin foil hats screwed on tight for this one as expected.

The NTSB will sort it out, and they usually don't make statements until their ducks are in a row.

But not on here. keep the comments coming. Great entertainment!
Our distinguished leader has informed us that the 'Government' will pay the entire cost!

The 'Government'........has NO MONEY!!
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

You have a very good point, flintlocke. Naturally, they will get a tankful there in Baltimore. Five minutes after the fill-up, the boat conks out. Quite the coincidence.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
Our distinguished leader has informed us that the 'Government' will pay the entire cost!

The 'Government'........has NO MONEY!!

It's in the Government and public's interest to have this bridge rebuilt ASAP. Waiting on the insurances to figure things out for 8 years and THEN start a rebuild - doesn't make sense.

.Gov steps in - pays, gets the bridge replaced ASAP and then takes the money from the insurance.


That's the preferred event. Will that happen? Dunno.
Posted By: WYcoyote Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
Our distinguished leader has informed us that the 'Government' will pay the entire cost!

The 'Government'........has NO MONEY!!

Lol.

That doesn't stop them from giving billions we don't have to the Ukes!
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

You have a very good point, flintlocke. Naturally, they will get a tankful there in Baltimore. Five minutes after the fill-up, the boat conks out. Quite the coincidence.
Pure speculation on my part, it may be even simpler than I suggested.
Dirty fuel is the norm. It is customary to draw fuel from the ship's storage tanks, double bottoms, to what is called a 'day tank'...nothing more than a small tank quantity (maybe 40,000 gal) sufficient to operate for 36 hours, the day tank fuel is then drained of water, sediment and may be centrifuged, but always strained and filtered before it goes to the engines. That's normal...it's what they do.
But, because of the solitary nature of seagoing life, crew is desperate to get off the ship for a few hours, and a good skipper and chief engineer make sure that happens whenever possible. In the confusion of juggling schedules, the ever present possibility that some crew will return to the ship unfit for duty (Exxon Valdez)....sometimes important schidt doesn't get done, or done by someone impaired. It happens.
This is where I venture into fantasy...it's entirely possible the day tank was pumped full, but the fuel was not cleaned, and that was not noted in the engine room log...or was noted and missed by the engineer who had the duty when Dali departed. Big gulps of water or sediment overwhelmed the first filter bank, the engines (generator or main or both) died, the filter system was frantically shifted to the second redundancy bank, which promptly plugged and the second failure was the kill shot. This literally can happen in minutes. It has happened to me as chief engineer on a tug, when a split weld opened in the hull in a double bottom tank and all I could get was seawater into the day tank. Fortunately we had a cool head for a skipper, and he prepared for worst scenario immediately...no damage to vessels, crew other than embarrassment.
And finally, my original assessment at the first hours, complete failure of the electrical system...whether at the main bus or switchgear. Rare but it happens.
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
Our distinguished leader has informed us that the 'Government' will pay the entire cost!

The 'Government'........has NO MONEY!!

It's in the Government and public's interest to have this bridge rebuilt ASAP. Waiting on the insurances to figure things out for 8 years and THEN start a rebuild - doesn't make sense.

.Gov steps in - pays, gets the bridge replaced ASAP and then takes the money from the insurance.


That's the preferred event. Will that happen? Dunno.
That’s how it works. Been there, done that. The contractor makes bank on these projects!
Posted By: 007FJ Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
Our distinguished leader has informed us that the 'Government' will pay the entire cost!

The 'Government'........has NO MONEY!!

It's in the Government and public's interest to have this bridge rebuilt ASAP. Waiting on the insurances to figure things out for 8 years and THEN start a rebuild - doesn't make sense.

.Gov steps in - pays, gets the bridge replaced ASAP and then takes the money from the insurance.


That's the preferred event. Will that happen? Dunno.
That’s how it works. Been there, done that. The contractor makes bank on these projects!

Contractor actually does something resembling work, the kickbacks to politicos is where the real bucks are.
Posted By: kennyd Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by JoeBob
And by the way, if port is left and starboard is right, then thatvbow went to the starboard side as giewed from the perspective of the pilot.

Exactly as I said - full reverse on a single screw prop walks the ship's stern to port - pushing the bow starboard in perspective.


They dropped the port anchor which would also cause a veer.
If the 55000 hp figure is correct there is still a lag. A drag boat this ain't.
Anyone know the winddirection?
I guessed from the black smoke I saw the wind was from port to starboard , give or take!
Originally Posted by kennyd
Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by JoeBob
And by the way, if port is left and starboard is right, then thatvbow went to the starboard side as giewed from the perspective of the pilot.

Exactly as I said - full reverse on a single screw prop walks the ship's stern to port - pushing the bow starboard in perspective.


They dropped the port anchor which would also cause a veer.
If the 55000 hp figure is correct there is still a lag. A drag boat this ain't.
Anyone know the winddirection?

Dropping anchor ain't gonna stop it dead in it's tracks.
Posted By: ribka Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by JoeBob
As far as I know there has been no official release of any info, right? We don’t even know that the power went out. Everyone is just assuming since the lights went out correct?

By now they have a basic understanding of what happened. They should release some preliminary details. Everyone knows that there is a lot of investigation to go, but by now they at least know what the pilot and crew say happened.
The lights and engine stopped when the power went out twice

The Baltimore FBI office determined that is was an accident 6 hours after the incident with no investigation

lol


Move along now
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

You have a very good point, flintlocke. Naturally, they will get a tankful there in Baltimore. Five minutes after the fill-up, the boat conks out. Quite the coincidence.
Pure speculation on my part, it may be even simpler than I suggested.
Dirty fuel is the norm. It is customary to draw fuel from the ship's storage tanks, double bottoms, to what is called a 'day tank'...nothing more than a small tank quantity (maybe 40,000 gal) sufficient to operate for 36 hours, the day tank fuel is then drained of water, sediment and may be centrifuged, but always strained and filtered before it goes to the engines. That's normal...it's what they do.
But, because of the solitary nature of seagoing life, crew is desperate to get off the ship for a few hours, and a good skipper and chief engineer make sure that happens whenever possible. In the confusion of juggling schedules, the ever present possibility that some crew will return to the ship unfit for duty (Exxon Valdez)....sometimes important schidt doesn't get done, or done by someone impaired. It happens.
This is where I venture into fantasy...it's entirely possible the day tank was pumped full, but the fuel was not cleaned, and that was not noted in the engine room log...or was noted and missed by the engineer who had the duty when Dali departed. Big gulps of water or sediment overwhelmed the first filter bank, the engines (generator or main or both) died, the filter system was frantically shifted to the second redundancy bank, which promptly plugged and the second failure was the kill shot. This literally can happen in minutes. It has happened to me as chief engineer on a tug, when a split weld opened in the hull in a double bottom tank and all I could get was seawater into the day tank. Fortunately we had a cool head for a skipper, and he prepared for worst scenario immediately...no damage to vessels, crew other than embarrassment.
And finally, my original assessment at the first hours, complete failure of the electrical system...whether at the main bus or switchgear. Rare but it happens.

Interesting. Quite the speculation.

It could also be that the captain is a deep state operative, trained and placed by the CIA 3 decades ago.

Waiting. Just waiting.
Posted By: Angus55 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
I have watched this for two days now, every angle and video blown up to close, don’t know how many props this ship has, if all power to all props went out , but what a few have said on here about tugs could have maybe straighten this container ship out and got it passed bridge without endangering anything is probably true, why do all ships travel without tugs until they are past this bridge ??? All I hear is how important this bay is to the country, make all ships pay for the tugs until open water, mandatory!!
Posted By: Strider1 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]
Originally Posted by Crockettnj
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

You have a very good point, flintlocke. Naturally, they will get a tankful there in Baltimore. Five minutes after the fill-up, the boat conks out. Quite the coincidence.
Pure speculation on my part, it may be even simpler than I suggested.
Dirty fuel is the norm. It is customary to draw fuel from the ship's storage tanks, double bottoms, to what is called a 'day tank'...nothing more than a small tank quantity (maybe 40,000 gal) sufficient to operate for 36 hours, the day tank fuel is then drained of water, sediment and may be centrifuged, but always strained and filtered before it goes to the engines. That's normal...it's what they do.
But, because of the solitary nature of seagoing life, crew is desperate to get off the ship for a few hours, and a good skipper and chief engineer make sure that happens whenever possible. In the confusion of juggling schedules, the ever present possibility that some crew will return to the ship unfit for duty (Exxon Valdez)....sometimes important schidt doesn't get done, or done by someone impaired. It happens.
This is where I venture into fantasy...it's entirely possible the day tank was pumped full, but the fuel was not cleaned, and that was not noted in the engine room log...or was noted and missed by the engineer who had the duty when Dali departed. Big gulps of water or sediment overwhelmed the first filter bank, the engines (generator or main or both) died, the filter system was frantically shifted to the second redundancy bank, which promptly plugged and the second failure was the kill shot. This literally can happen in minutes. It has happened to me as chief engineer on a tug, when a split weld opened in the hull in a double bottom tank and all I could get was seawater into the day tank. Fortunately we had a cool head for a skipper, and he prepared for worst scenario immediately...no damage to vessels, crew other than embarrassment.
And finally, my original assessment at the first hours, complete failure of the electrical system...whether at the main bus or switchgear. Rare but it happens.

Interesting. Quite the speculation.

It could also be that the captain is a deep state operative, trained and placed by the CIA 3 decades ago.

Waiting. Just waiting.
Yeah...that's probably it. crazy
Originally Posted by rickt300
Interesting that it is registered in Singapore.

Curious, isn’t it? It’s not like Singapore does much international trade with container ships.
Posted By: Teal Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by rickt300
Interesting that it is registered in Singapore.

Curious, isn’t it? It’s not like Singapore does much international trade with container ships.

The .gov has priced US Flagged ships out of the industry - be it ocean going or due to Jones Act. Great Lakes fleet is really the only one making that work I'm aware of.

TWIC cards too aren't helping. Expense and red-tape. I have mine so I can do what I want and need unescorted but I'm betting most foreigners haven't done the work and simply get escorted everywhere.
Posted By: Steve Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Here's an informative vid on the accident.

Posted By: GunGeek Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Poorly trained crew, not well maintained equipment. Foreign flagged and staffed ships are often actually owned by US companies, but this is how they get past compliance with US safety regulations. So what if it takes out a major bridge from time to time, or spills a gazillion barrels of oil on our beaches, my iphone got here cheap!!
I'm sure this was pure accident. About the only thing that bothers me about this whole thing...in the news reports, eyewitness accounts...I have not seen one single mention of the ship sounding it's horn when it became apparent that the situation became irretrievable. Maybe the videos I looked at just didn't have audio. Even though I don't think it's covered specifically in COLREGS, the pilots should have sounded the horn constantly until impact. Would it have saved lives? doubtful, with so many span sections falling, but it should have been done.
When I was working on crane barges, if we should have one or more anchors break loose or pull under high tension...anyone, crane operator, tug, rig tenders, workboats... was encouraged to sound the alarm by repeated short blasts of a horn...hold fast boys, immediately lower suspended loads, get out of the way of unsecured cargo, get away from anchor cables and deck fairleads.
Posted By: Longbob Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

You have a very good point, flintlocke. Naturally, they will get a tankful there in Baltimore. Five minutes after the fill-up, the boat conks out. Quite the coincidence.
Pure speculation on my part, it may be even simpler than I suggested.
Dirty fuel is the norm. It is customary to draw fuel from the ship's storage tanks, double bottoms, to what is called a 'day tank'...nothing more than a small tank quantity (maybe 40,000 gal) sufficient to operate for 36 hours, the day tank fuel is then drained of water, sediment and may be centrifuged, but always strained and filtered before it goes to the engines. That's normal...it's what they do.
But, because of the solitary nature of seagoing life, crew is desperate to get off the ship for a few hours, and a good skipper and chief engineer make sure that happens whenever possible. In the confusion of juggling schedules, the ever present possibility that some crew will return to the ship unfit for duty (Exxon Valdez)....sometimes important schidt doesn't get done, or done by someone impaired. It happens.
This is where I venture into fantasy...it's entirely possible the day tank was pumped full, but the fuel was not cleaned, and that was not noted in the engine room log...or was noted and missed by the engineer who had the duty when Dali departed. Big gulps of water or sediment overwhelmed the first filter bank, the engines (generator or main or both) died, the filter system was frantically shifted to the second redundancy bank, which promptly plugged and the second failure was the kill shot. This literally can happen in minutes. It has happened to me as chief engineer on a tug, when a split weld opened in the hull in a double bottom tank and all I could get was seawater into the day tank. Fortunately we had a cool head for a skipper, and he prepared for worst scenario immediately...no damage to vessels, crew other than embarrassment.
And finally, my original assessment at the first hours, complete failure of the electrical system...whether at the main bus or switchgear. Rare but it happens.

This is being reported now. Pretty good speculation on your part it seems.

“Dirty fuel” is one of several possible factors that may have caused the cargo ship Dali to lose power in the moments before it smashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore on Tuesday, according to shipping industry experts.

The investigation by federal, state and local authorities into what went wrong on the Dali is just beginning. But the deadly events on the Patapsco River in the dark of night have shined a light on the travails of the global shipping industry, including a long-standing problem with dirty fuel.

According to a 2018 report for the Atlantic Council think tank, a “witches brew” of industrial products ends up in marine fuel, resulting in hundreds of engine failures in recent years that have left ships powerless and drifting across the high seas.

The Dali went dark as it lost electrical power just before the bridge disaster, and the pilot lost the ability to control the ship as it veered toward the support structure of the bridge. That power loss could have been caused by dirty fuel clogging filters that lead to the ship’s main generator, said Gerald Scoggins, a veteran chief engineer in the oil and gas industry and the CEO of the Houston company Deepwater Producers.

He noted that ships use different fuels for different portions of their cruise. While inside a port, as the Dali was before the collision, ships typically run on a relatively light diesel fuel. That also could have been contaminated. Common contaminants include water, dirt and algae, Scoggins said.

Ian Ralby, the CEO of I.R. Consilium, a maritime and resource security consultancy, said heavy marine fuel loaded onto ships in port is mixed with what is called cutter stock, and is prone to being loaded with contaminants and is not closely regulated. Such dirty fuel could have “gummed up all of the fuel lines on the ship.”

Ralby, who co-authored the 2018 Atlantic Council report, said that waste products from refineries and other industrial operations have made their way illegally into shipping fuel, known as bunker fuel.

“The supply chain for bunker fuel is long, and relatively opaque,” the report states. “As a result, bunker fuel has become a final destination for the leftovers of the refining process.”

Merchant ships, the report states, then effectively function as incinerators for the refining industry. Inspectors have found bunker fuel contaminated with “used motor oil and by-products from the manufacture of plastics, rubber, cosmetics, fertilizers, and even paper goods.”

In the case of the Dali, Ralby said the possibility of a cyberattack should not be dismissed. It’s also possible that the ship had a purely mechanical failure in one of its critical systems.

The dirty fuel conjecture comes from observers with limited direct information about the ship, its fueling history and other potential mechanical problems that could have contributed to the loss of power and steering control.

Whatever the cause, the shipping industry has been roiled by the Baltimore disaster and other troubling developments, including attacks on Red Sea cargo ships by Houthi militants and low water in the Panama Canal. With those major shipping routes imperiled, the entire global supply chain has been rerouted, Ralby said — and that could exacerbate the dirty fuel problem.

“We may be in a situation where ships are going to be taking on fuel in places where they can’t guarantee the quality or caliber of fuel,” he said.
Posted By: Calvin Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/27/24
Have the campfire sleuths cracked the case yet?
Don't suppose the gov't was smart enough to impound the ship and drug test the whole crew either.
Originally Posted by Magnum_Bob
Don't suppose the gov't was smart enough to impound the ship and drug test the whole crew either.
The whole crew?
Posted By: WYcoyote Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
Originally Posted by Longbob
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Originally Posted by simonkenton7
Originally Posted by flintlocke
All of our theories and speculation are fun, but I would bet on much more simple and common mechanical failure.
There is one thing that I would bet will be looked at by the investigating agencies...did the Dali take on fuel while in Baltimore? Of course we have no way of knowing, but there are many grades of marine diesel (Not like your diesel, it's a blend of diesel #2 and heavy fuel oil))...and moneywise of course, the owners buy the lowest grades and prices. It's up to the ships engineers to make the fuel work, by filtering, settling and or centrifuging. It's nasty stuff, often containing the dregs of the refinery or at least sediments from the bottoms of dirty storage tanks.
Fuel contamination for a dollar Alex.

You have a very good point, flintlocke. Naturally, they will get a tankful there in Baltimore. Five minutes after the fill-up, the boat conks out. Quite the coincidence.
Pure speculation on my part, it may be even simpler than I suggested.
Dirty fuel is the norm. It is customary to draw fuel from the ship's storage tanks, double bottoms, to what is called a 'day tank'...nothing more than a small tank quantity (maybe 40,000 gal) sufficient to operate for 36 hours, the day tank fuel is then drained of water, sediment and may be centrifuged, but always strained and filtered before it goes to the engines. That's normal...it's what they do.
But, because of the solitary nature of seagoing life, crew is desperate to get off the ship for a few hours, and a good skipper and chief engineer make sure that happens whenever possible. In the confusion of juggling schedules, the ever present possibility that some crew will return to the ship unfit for duty (Exxon Valdez)....sometimes important schidt doesn't get done, or done by someone impaired. It happens.
This is where I venture into fantasy...it's entirely possible the day tank was pumped full, but the fuel was not cleaned, and that was not noted in the engine room log...or was noted and missed by the engineer who had the duty when Dali departed. Big gulps of water or sediment overwhelmed the first filter bank, the engines (generator or main or both) died, the filter system was frantically shifted to the second redundancy bank, which promptly plugged and the second failure was the kill shot. This literally can happen in minutes. It has happened to me as chief engineer on a tug, when a split weld opened in the hull in a double bottom tank and all I could get was seawater into the day tank. Fortunately we had a cool head for a skipper, and he prepared for worst scenario immediately...no damage to vessels, crew other than embarrassment.
And finally, my original assessment at the first hours, complete failure of the electrical system...whether at the main bus or switchgear. Rare but it happens.

This is being reported now. Pretty good speculation on your part it seems.

“Dirty fuel” is one of several possible factors that may have caused the cargo ship Dali to lose power in the moments before it smashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore on Tuesday, according to shipping industry experts.

The investigation by federal, state and local authorities into what went wrong on the Dali is just beginning. But the deadly events on the Patapsco River in the dark of night have shined a light on the travails of the global shipping industry, including a long-standing problem with dirty fuel.

According to a 2018 report for the Atlantic Council think tank, a “witches brew” of industrial products ends up in marine fuel, resulting in hundreds of engine failures in recent years that have left ships powerless and drifting across the high seas.

The Dali went dark as it lost electrical power just before the bridge disaster, and the pilot lost the ability to control the ship as it veered toward the support structure of the bridge. That power loss could have been caused by dirty fuel clogging filters that lead to the ship’s main generator, said Gerald Scoggins, a veteran chief engineer in the oil and gas industry and the CEO of the Houston company Deepwater Producers.

He noted that ships use different fuels for different portions of their cruise. While inside a port, as the Dali was before the collision, ships typically run on a relatively light diesel fuel. That also could have been contaminated. Common contaminants include water, dirt and algae, Scoggins said.

Ian Ralby, the CEO of I.R. Consilium, a maritime and resource security consultancy, said heavy marine fuel loaded onto ships in port is mixed with what is called cutter stock, and is prone to being loaded with contaminants and is not closely regulated. Such dirty fuel could have “gummed up all of the fuel lines on the ship.”

Ralby, who co-authored the 2018 Atlantic Council report, said that waste products from refineries and other industrial operations have made their way illegally into shipping fuel, known as bunker fuel.

“The supply chain for bunker fuel is long, and relatively opaque,” the report states. “As a result, bunker fuel has become a final destination for the leftovers of the refining process.”

Merchant ships, the report states, then effectively function as incinerators for the refining industry. Inspectors have found bunker fuel contaminated with “used motor oil and by-products from the manufacture of plastics, rubber, cosmetics, fertilizers, and even paper goods.”

In the case of the Dali, Ralby said the possibility of a cyberattack should not be dismissed. It’s also possible that the ship had a purely mechanical failure in one of its critical systems.

The dirty fuel conjecture comes from observers with limited direct information about the ship, its fueling history and other potential mechanical problems that could have contributed to the loss of power and steering control.

Whatever the cause, the shipping industry has been roiled by the Baltimore disaster and other troubling developments, including attacks on Red Sea cargo ships by Houthi militants and low water in the Panama Canal. With those major shipping routes imperiled, the entire global supply chain has been rerouted, Ralby said — and that could exacerbate the dirty fuel problem.

“We may be in a situation where ships are going to be taking on fuel in places where they can’t guarantee the quality or caliber of fuel,” he said.

Friggen ethanol gummed up the carburetors.
Posted By: las Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
Climate change.
Posted By: akrange Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
Flim Fram Gas Filters

Fuel

Hahahaha Hahahaha

It was the Crumpet Valve you Ninny

Hahahaha Hahahaha
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
Originally Posted by Steve
Here's an informative vid on the accident.

Thanks for that Steve.

Nice of him to use the actual track of the vessel and mention "perspective" and the effect of "wind and current".

Gives a whole different idea of what that video shows
Posted By: Stophel Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
When the bridge is rebuilt, I predict it will NOT be the Francis Scott Key bridge any longer. I can guarandamntee that it will be renamed the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial bridge.
Posted By: slumlord Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
Freddy Gray memorial bridge
Originally Posted by Stophel
When the bridge is rebuilt, I predict it will NOT be the Francis Scott Key bridge any longer. I can guarandamntee that it will be renamed the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial bridge.

George Floyd, that MLK niqqer is old news
Posted By: Angus55 Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/28/24
Absolutely will have a groid name, it’s Baltimore!
Clusterfuck Nation


Discover more from Clusterfuck Nation
James Howard Kunstler’s Clusterfuck Nation blog is updated Mondays and Fridays. The KunstlerCast is a monthly podcast. Look for new Eyesore of the Month entries early in the month.

Oh Say Can You See?
“A modern nuc can fit in the trunk of a car. When millions of people can walk across our border with impunity what do you think the chances are we would catch something that size?” — Sam Faddi

JAMES HOWARD KUNSTLER
MAR 29, 2024
That’s Sam Faddis, retired CIA (quote didn’t quite fit in block).

Who among you was not impressed seeing the sudden and total collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge after getting its pylon bonked by the container ship Dali a few hours before the dawn’s early light in Baltimore harbor? In America’s ongoing death-of-a-thousand-cuts, that one literally severed a major artery, but it may take a while to know how badly the wounded colossus known as the USA is bleeding out.

“Joe Biden” emerged from his crypt pronto to state that the federal government would pony-up the cost of building the bridge back better, meant to reassure the public, you’d suppose. But perhaps the real reason was to obviate an otherwise requisite investigation of the crash by ship-owner Grace Ocean's insurance company — since legal wrangling over responsibility would add more years to the already years-long estimated bridge replacement time-frame. And Gawd knows what else they might discover about how the darn thing came to pass. . . rumors of a Ukrainian captain at the Dali’shelm. . . stuff that the ruling intel blob might not want to get out there, especially given the still-murky role of the joint USA-UK black-op blobs in the Moscow Crocus Theater Massacre just a week earlier.


The Crocus op, you understand, was probably the worst clusterfuck qua Three Stooges blob operational procedure in memory, since four of the six surviving Tajiki shooters were nabbed in a car enroute to the Ukraine border (where they would’ve been whacked into silence, since they failed to martyr themselves at the scene-of-the-crime), and by now had surely sung their hearts out to persuasive interrogators of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) — the take-away being that President VV Putin has got to be mighty pissed-off and itching for revenge. Was the FSK Bridge take-down the first repayment for that, lots of people inside and outside Blob Central were probably wondering?

You’d also have to wonder, qua the bridge disaster itself, about the implied reverberations through the insurance industry. Consider that the insurance industry is a major cog in the machinery of finance and banking, since insurance company reserves are traditionally allocated in supposedly safe sovereign treasury bonds. Liquidations anyone? Maritime insurance was already groaning under the burden of all that monkey-business in the Red Sea, thanks to Houthi rocket and drone attacks on the shipping of Western Civ. Are the banks quaking harder now? Many across Western Civ were already trembling before the FSK Bridge job.

While the awesome spectacle of the bridge collapse traumatized the country, it also brought to mind the fantastic flow of ten-thousand illegal border crossings a day, stage-managed by the “Joe Biden” Homeland Security team. Did you kind of wonder how many in that 10K-a-day flow might be the same species of Central Asian mutts who volunteered to slaughter over 150 (so far) Russian concert-goers? Nobody is checking who they are, you realize. They just step on US soil, get issued smartphones, loaded debit cards, walking-around cash money, airplane and bus tickets and, voila, there they are in your home town tomorrow, looking for something to occupy themselves. Thanks a bunch, Alejandro Mayorkas!
Are you wondering what sort of mayhem they might be capable of unleashing any place from Bangor to Burbank in the weeks and months ahead? (And, while you’re at it, think about all the food processing plant fires, train wrecks, and other mysterious tribulations around the country the past couple of years.) Consider that this very week alone, following the SSK Bridge disaster, absolutely nothing has been done by our government to stem that flow of countless potential saboteurs into the country. The news media isn’t even talking about it (of course).

The prospects might look a bit unnerving, wouldn’t you agree? Things catching fire, blowing up, and falling down here, there, and everywhere. . . more of those thousand cuts adding up. Just maybe, the dazed-and-confused (possibly hypnotized) American public, a.k.a., the “voters,” might put together that “Joe Biden” and the Party of Chaos that owns him, are actually responsible for the on-going take-down of our country. After a certain point — now apparently passed — sheer incompetence is no longer a plausible explanation for what you are seeing.

Oh, one other thing, look out for on-the-ground economic reverberations from the FSK Bridge disaster. For instance, Baltimore is the USA’s top port for importing and exporting automobiles. Also, earth-moving and large farm equipment, fertilizer, lumber, coal, and steel. Other arrangements must be made, for years ahead, considering the trucking links. It’s especially an interruption for trucking between the mid-Atlantic / New England states and much of Dixieland. It will affect the transport of fruits and vegetables to the Washington-Boston corridor. Things are going to cost more and we are already in an inflationary trouble-zone. How will this thunder elsewhere through an economy which, despite the japes of “Joe Biden’s” statisticians, is actively disintegrating? The fluttering wings of this black swan already throw a chill on spring’s incoming zephyrs.
Posted By: akrange Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/29/24
Why haven’t we see Command and Control form the Breastfeeding Bitch Secretary of Commerce..

Why were those Bridge Supports not protected from a Collusion Peter

The Cost of a Run Away Boat is going to greatly exceed the Insurance Policy of protection..

Maybe it’s Homophobic to ask our leaders to Lead..

Maybe Ted Curse,Little Marco or even The Silver Bell Lindsay who confirmed Peter can answer some of these Questions in his Stead

If you put him there it’s your Responsibility Also.
Posted By: wabigoon Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/29/24
Something like $440.000.000 to rebuild it?
Probably the Ukraine , Mexico , and China will pay for the bridge!!
Originally Posted by Angus55
Absolutely will have a groid name, it’s Baltimore!
probably name it the freddie gray memoriol bridge . over the 25 year old Black , killed i think when he fell inside the back of the police van
Posted By: RHOD Re: Baltimore Bridge Collapse - 03/29/24
Originally Posted by Angus55
I have watched this for two days now, every angle and video blown up to close, don’t know how many props this ship has, if all power to all props went out , but what a few have said on here about tugs could have maybe straighten this container ship out and got it passed bridge without endangering anything is probably true, why do all ships travel without tugs until they are past this bridge ??? All I hear is how important this bay is to the country, make all ships pay for the tugs until open water, mandatory!!


Mandatory Tugs? More Government Regulation? You sound like on of them communists.
© 24hourcampfire