beware of deadbeat lying pompous ahole seller WYMTNRANGE on gunauctions.com
Larry Root 83 Antelope Trail Pinedale, WY 82941 307-367-7711
embellishes and misrepresents his wares. Piss poor photos and hyper inflated prices. Do not believe me then check out his sales for yourselves. http://www.gunauction.com/shop/gunshop/wymtnrange Read the descriptions and the remarks on some of his sale ads. unless you want to be rooked stay away from this unscrupulous seller.
beware of deadbeat lying pompous ahole seller WYMTNRANGE on gunauctions.com
Larry Root 83 Antelope Trail Pinedale, WY 82941 307-367-7711
embellishes and misrepresents his wares. Piss poor photos and hyper inflated prices. Do not believe me then check out his sales for yourselves. http://www.gunauction.com/shop/gunshop/wymtnrange Read the descriptions and the remarks on some of his sale ads. unless you want to be rooked stay away from this unscrupulous seller.
YEAH THAT MUST BE WHY HIS FEEDBACK IS 100% POSITIVE ....LMAO
beware of deadbeat lying pompous ahole seller WYMTNRANGE on gunauctions.com
Larry Root 83 Antelope Trail Pinedale, WY 82941 307-367-7711
embellishes and misrepresents his wares. Piss poor photos and hyper inflated prices. Do not believe me then check out his sales for yourselves. http://www.gunauction.com/shop/gunshop/wymtnrange Read the descriptions and the remarks on some of his sale ads. unless you want to be rooked stay away from this unscrupulous seller.
YEAH THAT MUST BE WHY HIS FEEDBACK IS 100% POSITIVE ....LMAO
Really, numbnutz...you're gonna play this silly ass game again. Just STFU now Larry, and go away
Says something about some people when they glorify a cheating crook deadbeat and censure the guy who just wants to get the word out to future victims.
Perhaps too much to expect for anyone to check out both party's feedback ..... eh ?
Ummm, yeah...
Says "something" about a certain geriatric TROLL that's been banned literally dozens of times from the Campfire, only to continue to circumvent his banishment by creating numerous screen names via proxy and IP servers.
Only to be banned again and again. You must get off on it as obviously it's the only attention you can rustle up in your broke dog dick world.
when He-ll freezes over. You dolts are like a big dumb bass sitting under a lily pad. Flip out a Hula-Popper and "whammo", you in the pan.
I've been here far longer than you and will be when you and your fake negro hoodie homeboy persona are just a memory in Potter's field.
What are you shooting for ? Being Bricktop II ? I'd say you're too dumb and certainly don't have his repertoire of obscene words. As much of an azz as he is, he does know a lot about shipping firearms unlike you who has terminal DNS
You see how "Classical" suddenly turned to "Oldman1942" when Larry got busted, counterfeiting yet another handle.
He's been asked to stop posting on this site multiple times, but just can't seem to help himself. Fortunately we have some sharp IT guys who catch him on a regular basis and the site mgr. is pretty savy and is onto him.
Funny you join this site just to lie. My F/B is 100% positive ....... you will soon be banned from there.
in your dreams you pompous old gas bag. Looks like you have been banned. and from what i have been told it happens all the time. Truth hurts huh? misrepresent and embellish your wares and asked crazy insane prices. your 100%%F/B is worth about as much as your god awful edited over priced books that is at best good for toilet paper.
Sorry you had to get tied up in a deal to learn what a whack job Larry is. But, he's usually good for some cheap entertainment. And, like the Energizer Bunny, he just keeps on keeping on, driven it seems by his disease process.
What goes around, comes around Larry. And you are getting exactly what you deserve. Go crawl back under your rock somewhere and quit looking for any form of respect or appreciation from anyone here. You alienate the entire membership here and then are aghast when no one supports you? Pull your head out of your azz and get a [bleep]' clue you scumbag.
Classical (LRoot) was not only banned, he was "deleted".
There's a difference. When you ban someone, the posts he made are still visible. He just can't post anymore.
When you delete someone, it erases anything they did.
Cool!
No, his "classical" persona was merged with his banned and locked "oldman1942" persona. That's what Rick and/or the Moderators have been doing with his numerous screen names he continues to generate.
That way one can still see Larry's asinine posts. Makes it easy to refer others to Larry's past douchbaggery as you can refer them to three accounts (oldman1942, bosslady, interthem) instead of 75+ accounts.
Classical (LRoot) was not only banned, he was "deleted".
There's a difference. When you ban someone, the posts he made are still visible. He just can't post anymore.
When you delete someone, it erases anything they did.
Cool!
No, his "classical" persona was merged with his banned and locked "oldman1942" persona. That's what Rick and/or the Moderators have been doing with his numerous screen names he continues to generate.
That way one can still see Larry's asinine posts. Makes it easy to refer others to Larry's past douchbaggery as you can refer them to three accounts (oldman1942, bosslady, interthem) instead of 75+ accounts.
I think you are right.
Some others may be prime candidates for that procedure as well.
Root just asked me to post this, in response to all the abuse that you heatless bastidges continue to heap on his most honorable, and upstanding personna.
beware of deadbeat lying pompous ahole seller WYMTNRANGE on gunauctions.com
Larry Root 83 Antelope Trail Pinedale, WY 82941 307-367-7711
embellishes and misrepresents his wares. Piss poor photos and hyper inflated prices. Do not believe me then check out his sales for yourselves. http://www.gunauction.com/shop/gunshop/wymtnrange Read the descriptions and the remarks on some of his sale ads. unless you want to be rooked stay away from this unscrupulous seller.
I am curious as to exactly what happened. Did you bid on one of his items or not? If you did bid on it, did you pay for it and not receive it?
I am wondering on what basis you say he misrepresents his wares. Did you receive something from him that was not what he said it was?
I am wondering why you say he has hyper inflated prices. Is there a rule on gunauctions that says a person isn't allowed to ask what he wants for something? Do you post on sites like this for everyone you think asks too much for something on other sites?
You seem to have done a lot of the same things you accused him of, and the rest of you guys are like a bunch of sharks who smell blood in the water!
beware of deadbeat lying pompous ahole seller WYMTNRANGE on gunauctions.com
Larry Root 83 Antelope Trail Pinedale, WY 82941 307-367-7711
embellishes and misrepresents his wares. Piss poor photos and hyper inflated prices. Do not believe me then check out his sales for yourselves. http://www.gunauction.com/shop/gunshop/wymtnrange Read the descriptions and the remarks on some of his sale ads. unless you want to be rooked stay away from this unscrupulous seller.
I am curious as to exactly what happened. Did you bid on one of his items or not? If you did bid on it, did you pay for it and not receive it?
I am wondering on what basis you say he misrepresents his wares. Did you receive something from him that was not what he said it was?
I am wondering why you say he has hyper inflated prices. Is there a rule on gunauctions that says a person isn't allowed to ask what he wants for something? Do you post on sites like this for everyone who asks too much for something on other sites?
You seem to have done a lot of the same things you accused him of, and the rest of you guys are like a bunch of sharks who smell blood in the water!
Nope that is Kevin, he likes to defend Larry... Makes him feel important, he also defends chimos and brags about it ala Hillary Clinton, just so you know.
i think I'm the only one who has made that Sack Of Sht come on here and apologize for his BS. but it didn't last long.
If you reread his "apology", you'll see that it was anything but...
Printed this to help explain Larry and his actions. These types never take responsibility for their actions, all things revolve around them. They typically blame others for their own shortcomings.
DF
◾A narcissistic sociopath is someone with a combination of narcissistic personality disorder and definitive behavioral signs of sociopathy. ◾People with narcissism are characterized by their excessive and persistent need for others� admiration and positive reinforcement. They generally have grandiose opinions of themselves and believe they are superior to other people. Narcissists are also frequently convinced that they are above the normal responsibilities and obligations of everyday life, so they usually have significant difficulties maintaining employment or relationships as a result. ◾The narcissistic sociopath has this type of personality along with a noticeable lack of regard for the rights of others and a tendency to regularly violate those rights.
Argumentum ad Hominem - The fallacy oif shifting an argument from the point being discussed to the personality of the opponent. Instead of dealing with the opponent's thesis on its merits, the fallacious argument attacks his reputation and moral character, or refers to his low intelligence, inferior social position, lack of education or similar personal shortcomings.
Argumentum ad Populum - Arguments which depart from the question under discussion by making an appeal to the feelings and prejudices of the multitude. These types of fallacies are very popular on internet sites.
I stopped running for judge after I got cancer. But again, all of this is Ad Hominem.
The original post speaks about whether there was a bad transaction between two parties. Usually you are pretty good at getting to the truth here. But this time you let yourself sink into the ad hominem pithole. So I asked the questions that you would normally ask!!!!
I stopped running for judge after I got cancer. But again, all of this is Ad Hominem.
The original post speaks about whether there was a bad transaction between two parties. Usually you guys are pretty good at getting to the truth here. But this time you all let yourself sink into the ad hominem pithole. So I asked the questions that you would normally ask!!!!
y
The truth was gotten to very quickly in this incident.
I have read some of the threads involving Larry Root. Most are like this one. Those who don't know him or weren't involved in the transaction make Ad Hominem and Ad Populum statements and arguments on no basis other than hearsay from others.
For example. Do you personally know him. Have you personally had any transactions with him. I suspect the answer would be no to both questions. Yet you join in to ridicule him, and me, and I suspect others when you have been incited to do so.
Actually, I do a lot of pro bono work, helping poor and disadvantaged people who could not otherwise afford or qualify for a lawyer.
But again, what I do is not the gravamen of this thread. Whether there was actually a bad transaction is the gravamen of this thread.
The fact that a bad transaction happened was already established by the OP. in re: he was involved
Actually, that you do a lot of Pro bono work, for dis advantaged people answers the question of why you feel constantky obligated to defend Larry Root, it's a sympathetic reflex
No, the gravamen of this and EVERY thread involving Larry is that obviously Rick Bin doesn't welcome nor desire Larry Roots participation on his web site, thus THE reason Larry is banned every time he rears his diseased cyber head.
Actually, I do a lot of pro bono work, helping poor and disadvantaged people who could not otherwise afford or qualify for a lawyer.
But again, what I do is not the gravamen of this thread. Whether there was actually a bad transaction is the gravamen of this thread.
The fact that a bad transaction happened was already established by the OP. in re: he was involved
Actually, that you do a lot of Pro bono work, for dis advantaged people answers the question of why you feel constantky obligated to defend Larry Root, it's a syphilytic reflex
Because Larry is just a painful drip! I hope he got his ass reamed in that GunAuctions transaction.
"The fact that a bad transaction happened was already established by the OP. in re: he was involved"
That a person was involved in a transaction does not make it a fact that it was a bad transaction, and from the OP's posting there is no proof that there was a transaction. That is why I asked if there was one, and if so, what it was.
I don't feel obligated to defend anyone. But in this particular case it appears that there has been a lot of hearsay, Ad Hominem Argument, and Ad Populum Argument, and I decided I would ask a few of the questions that are normally asked of any poster once they make a post claiming that they were involved in a bad transaction.
You continue to make this thread about me. It is not about me. It is about an alleged bad transaction, and your continued postings about me are Ad Hominum Argumentem.
You oughta put the legal dictionary down, or atleast learn another [bleep] word from it. Any transaction involving Larry Root is a bad transaction. The man is not wanted here and has been banned several times by the site owner, yet keeps coming back. That tells me all I need to know about his character
Yes, he has been banned. I am not arguing against that. Its Mr. Bin's site and he has the right to ban who he wants. So that is always going to be an issue when he posts.
Once again my posts here on this thread were concerned with the bad transaction, independent of whether he is a member or is supposed to be posting.
Gitgem 12
I don't think I have had a Black's Law Dictionary in my hands for over a year!
I have read some of the threads involving Larry Root. Most are like this one. Those who don't know him or weren't involved in the transaction make Ad Hominem and Ad Populum statements and arguments on no basis other than hearsay from others.
For example. Do you personally know him. Have you personally had any transactions with him. I suspect the answer would be no to both questions. Yet you join in to ridicule him, and me, and I suspect others when you have been incited to do so.
"No one cares about your homo and popo adds any more than they care about Root."
That is a classic fallacy of misplaced authority. When you say no one cares you purport to speak for all people, yet you do not know all people, and do not have authority to speak for all people.
And again, the thread is about a bad transaction, not my adds or whether people care about Root.
I have read some of the threads involving Larry Root. Most are like this one. Those who don't know him or weren't involved in the transaction make Ad Hominem and Ad Populum statements and arguments on no basis other than hearsay from others.
For example. Do you personally know him. Have you personally had any transactions with him. I suspect the answer would be no to both questions. Yet you join in to ridicule him, and me, and I suspect others when you have been incited to do so.
I am saddened by your wasted life.
I'm not, people that argue and carry on in their own special "Secret English / legal-eze" are the fargin' losers that's put an honest and straightforward Country and Culture in the goddam toilet.
"Judge" ?
Hey, he can go eat chit and judge the taste of it, and if he rides for root, it's probably about a Liason in Key West, and the sorta' thing that's no place here for extended discussion.
Argumentum Ad Hominem is not secret English or legalese. Rather, it is a very commonly used argument that consists of an appeal to personal ridicule. And if it is done in front of more than a few people it is also argumentum ad populum, which is an appeal to the masses.
Just as you have attempted to dispel my argument by personally ridiculing me in front of your audience.
Argumentum Ad Hominem is not secret English or legalese. Rather, it is a very commonly used argument that consists of an appeal to personal ridicule. And if it is done in front of more than a few people it is also argumentum ad populum, which is an appeal to the masses.
Just as you have attempted to dispel my argument by personally ridiculing me in front of your audience.
Yo, dic#weed,...this is most EMPHATICALLY not my audience.
YOU are the one "acting" and "playing to,....yadda"
I'm just shooting chit , mostly with FRIENDS, many of which I actually associate with.
Nevertheless, your postings objectively ridicule me in front of an audience rather than address the issue of whether there was an actual transaction between the op and root. It is classic argumentum ad hominem and ad populum.
Nevertheless, your postings objectively ridicule me in front of an audience rather than address the issue of whether there was an actual transaction between the op and root. It is classic argumentum ad hominem and ad populum.
Here's the quick and dirty
Noone really gives a [bleep] about whether there really was a transaction or not.
No body on this forum, except you has any use for Larry Root, when he shows his deranged, multiple named self he catches shcit until he gets booted. And he will likely continue to catch schit, because he is a piece of schit.
Kevin, when nobody cares, but you keep typing, that makes you a F ucking idiot. (ad hominem just to save you from typing schit that people don't care about once again)... piss off...
I have personally never met Larry Root and I have never had a transaction with Larry Root.
My issue is whether there was actually a transaction between the posters (if you don't want to talk about Root anymore). If nobody else cares, I care because I don't think this site should be used as a place to complain about transactions on other sites.
To continue to state that I am a "fan" or "advocate" or whatever is to continue to objectively ridicule me (calling me a [bleep] idiot, stating I should put a bucket over my head, etc.) for my interest in the truth about a transaction.
If it is true that "Nobody has any use for or cares about Larry Root", or anyone else for that matter, why not ignore them like everyone posts that they are going to do?
If someone is kicked of the site that issue is really between the owner of the site and the person who is kicked off the site, isn't it?
Well, then you should have a problem with Root, because he is the one who started the thread. The ban issue is between rick and him. Rick just uses us to sniff his stinky old azz out so he can keep banning him
I think another problem is that some people cannot read, and others only read what they want to and leave the balance out.
Once again, I am not defending anyone here. Nor do I know why anyone else would assume other identities, although I do find it quite strange that most of the people who are complaining about people changing identities are unwilling to provide their own.
Hence the faceless internet. Its easy talk big and put down other people when a person is nameless and faceless. Not so easy when the other way around.
I think another problem is that some people cannot read, and others only read what they want to and leave the balance out.
Once again, I am not defending anyone here. Nor do I know why anyone else would assume other identities, although I do find it quite strange that most of the people who are complaining about people changing identities are unwilling to provide their own.
Several people here have my name, address, home and cell phone numbers.
I think another problem is that some people cannot read, and others only read what they want to and leave the balance out.
Once again, I am not defending anyone here. Nor do I know why anyone else would assume other identities, although I do find it quite strange that most of the people who are complaining about people changing identities are unwilling to provide their own.
Hence the faceless internet. Its easy talk big and put down other people when a person is nameless and faceless. Not so easy when the other way around.
I'm not one of those faceless internet idiots you speak of.... from what the moron larry has posted I'd tell him to his face he is a worthless sack of [bleep]. I go by what folks post as to how they are, thats the only way to judge them..
larry has done nothing usefull and continually comes where he is not welcome simply to stir the pot.
Those types of folks are trolls and I have NO use for them on the net or in person.
I think another problem is that some people cannot read, and others only read what they want to and leave the balance out.
Once again, I am not defending anyone here. Nor do I know why anyone else would assume other identities, although I do find it quite strange that most of the people who are complaining about people changing identities are unwilling to provide their own.
Hence the faceless internet. Its easy talk big and put down other people when a person is nameless and faceless. Not so easy when the other way around.
Why, in this day and age of kooks, and nuts and fruits, would anyone really want to post their address, phone number etc? Hell I may as well give you the combo to my imaginary gun safes and the key to my cars?
There is a difference between nameless/faceless and being a total idiot.
I think another problem is that some people cannot read, and others only read what they want to and leave the balance out.
Once again, I am not defending anyone here. Nor do I know why anyone else would assume other identities, although I do find it quite strange that most of the people who are complaining about people changing identities are unwilling to provide their own.
Hence the faceless internet. Its easy talk big and put down other people when a person is nameless and faceless. Not so easy when the other way around.
Why, in this day and age of kooks, and nuts and fruits, would anyone really want to post their address, phone number etc? Hell I may as well give you the combo to my imaginary gun safes and the key to my cars?
There is a difference between nameless/faceless and being a total idiot.
I totally agree. But why would you then want to use another person's name and address and other personal information here or on any other site, even if you did't like what he or she posed on an internet forum?
The problem here is 22WRF takes Root seriously, while he is simply entertainment for the rest of us. I don't post on here a lot, but I do read a lot. After reading of some of Larry Root's antics (calling a member's home and leaving a nasty message, the layaway debacle, giving bad advice,and just plain being an azz) I wouldn't want to be involved in any sort of transaction with him.
Argumentum ad Hominem - The fallacy oif shifting an argument from the point being discussed to the personality of the opponent. Instead of dealing with the opponent's thesis on its merits, the fallacious argument attacks his reputation and moral character, or refers to his low intelligence, inferior social position, lack of education or similar personal shortcomings.
Argumentum ad Populum - Arguments which depart from the question under discussion by making an appeal to the feelings and prejudices of the multitude. These types of fallacies are very popular on internet sites.
The fallacy of your thesis is ones words/thoughts must be received/interpreted through the filter of one's pathology. To do otherwise is to miss the whole point.
"The fallacy of your thesis is ones words/thoughts must be received/interpreted through the filter of one's pathology. To do otherwise is to miss the whole point. "
Not a thesis and not mine. Its a definition of a type of argument.
A simple example should suffice.
A person says a car is blue. Another person says, no that car isn't blue because you are an idiot. That is Ad Hominem. To say it in front of an audience is Ad Populum, and to say it to incite others to feel the same way is a fallacy of emotive language, which is the attempt to arouse unreasoned feelings. All of you are doing all three right now.
No, I have always been suggesting that we get back to the original subject at hand, which was whether there was an actual transaction or not between the parties. It was others who decided to make it about me and my character by the use of ad hominem, ad populum, and emotive language.
And the suggestion of what I do for a job is ad hominem, populum, and emotive.
Look dipschit, no one cares about the definition of the names they call you. No one cares about Larry Fuggin Root. No one is ever going to get a thread back on track after four pages. Now get your sorry ass to church where other people can see your face and roll their eyes.
Look dipschit, no one cares about the definition of the names they call you. No one cares about Larry Fuggin Root. No one is ever going to get a thread back on track after four pages. Now get your sorry ass to church where other people can see your face and roll their eyes.
AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM!
It's a lot like Gomer Pyle's "CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST! CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST! CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST!"
beware of deadbeat lying pompous ahole seller WYMTNRANGE on gunauctions.com
Larry Root 83 Antelope Trail Pinedale, WY 82941 307-367-7711
embellishes and misrepresents his wares. Piss poor photos and hyper inflated prices. Do not believe me then check out his sales for yourselves. http://www.gunauction.com/shop/gunshop/wymtnrange Read the descriptions and the remarks on some of his sale ads. unless you want to be rooked stay away from this unscrupulous seller.
I am curious as to exactly what happened. Did you bid on one of his items or not? If you did bid on it, did you pay for it and not receive it?
I am wondering on what basis you say he misrepresents his wares. Did you receive something from him that was not what he said it was?
I am wondering why you say he has hyper inflated prices. Is there a rule on gunauctions that says a person isn't allowed to ask what he wants for something? Do you post on sites like this for everyone who asks too much for something on other sites?
You seem to have done a lot of the same things you accused him of, and the rest of you guys are like a bunch of sharks who smell blood in the water!
Larry, is that you again?
Nah, he just likes to defend dead beats and crooks, like Greg Hein..
Look dipschit, no one cares about the definition of the names they call you. No one cares about Larry Fuggin Root. No one is ever going to get a thread back on track after four pages. Now get your sorry ass to church where other people can see your face and roll their eyes.
AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM!
It's a lot like Gomer Pyle's "CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST! CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST! CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST!"
Look dipschit, no one cares about the definition of the names they call you. No one cares about Larry Fuggin Root. No one is ever going to get a thread back on track after four pages. Now get your sorry ass to church where other people can see your face and roll their eyes.
AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM!
It's a lot like Gomer Pyle's "CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST! CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST! CITIZEN'S A-RAY-EST!"
"Nah, he just likes to defend dead beats and crooks, like Greg Hein.."
If you go back and review what I said you would see that I did not defend Greg Hein. Rather, what I said was that if you pushed a deadbeat too far you would end up with nothing, which is exactly what happened.
If I would have been defending Greg Hein I would have felt bad for him. As I recall, I repeatedly stated that I felt bad for what happened to you and Howard, and I still do.
"Nah, he just likes to defend dead beats and crooks, like Greg Hein.."
If you go back and review what I said you would see that I did not defend Greg Hein. Rather, what I said was that if you pushed a deadbeat too far you would end up with nothing, which is exactly what happened.
No, I have always been suggesting that we get back to the original subject at hand, which was whether there was an actual transaction or not between the parties.
Aside from Larry Root, JWGibson, and yourself, I doubt anyone gives a sheit.
Since it apparently seems to be important to you, perhaps you should send JW a PM? And give old Larry a jingle. His phone# is listed. So is JW's...
Or perhaps that's too much effort for you? Or just maybe, all you REALLY want to do is fan the flames and stir the turds...
No, I have always been suggesting that we get back to the original subject at hand, which was whether there was an actual transaction or not between the parties.
Aside from Larry Root, JWGibson, and yourself, I doubt anyone gives a sheit.
Since it apparently seems to be important to you, perhaps you should send JW a PM? And give old Larry a jingle. His phone# is listed.
Or perhaps that's too much effort for you? Or just maybe, all you REALLY want to do is fan the flames and stir the turds...
He can't find any women or minorities to harangue over running for judge again.
"don't you lawyers pride yourselves in convincing a mob ( jury) that you're right and the other guy is wrong?"
A lot of people put down lawyers. Like to make fun of them. That is until they really need one. then all of a sudden its "pull out all of the stops and do whatever it takes to get me off" or "get the other guy". If you want to make fun of lawyers, look in the mirror and make fun of the ones who are paying them.
All your "Ad whatever's" notwithstanding, don't you lawyers pride yourselves in convincing a mob ( jury) that you're right and the other guy is wrong?
How does that pass muster and advocates on a forum, doing the same thing are somehow all wet?
DF
Well, he has apparently only tried a few more cases than he has unsuccessfully run for judge. May be a good indication of his abilities to sway people right here.
"don't you lawyers pride yourselves in convincing a mob ( jury) that you're right and the other guy is wrong?"
A lot of people put down lawyers. Like to make fun of them. That is until they really need one. then all of a sudden its "pull out all of the stops and do whatever it takes to get me off" or "get the other guy". If you want to make fun of lawyers, look in the mirror and make fun of the ones who are paying them.
Let 22 have the last word, or this will go on all year.
He either still hasn't figured out no one cared about the transaction i the first place, or he's in some kind of contest to be the most deliberately obtuse douchebag on the internet.
All your "Ad whatever's" notwithstanding, don't you lawyers pride yourselves in convincing a mob ( jury) that you're right and the other guy is wrong?
How does that pass muster and advocates on a forum, doing the same thing are somehow all wet?
DF
Well, he has apparently only tried a few more cases than he has unsuccessfully run for judge. May be a good indication of his abilities to sway people right here.
Yeah, he isn't making much progress here on the Fire. This "jury" will show him the door..
or I will continue to respond to ad hominem attacks as it seems that people care about these issues even though they say they don't.
And virtually no one other than yourself, Larry Root, and all his cyber persona's will give a sheit. So, carry on as only you can Kevin "wifebeater" "wifeholderbacker" Kolosky!
I think it was the vag pics in his replies to Miss Lynn.
Not sure what happened to him, all I know is Rick surveyed the pics he left for me in the cooking forum, and next morning his posts with the pics in them were gone, and the same pics that I quoted in a reply to him are gone and all that sits in their place is the following:
Was just my assumtion. Not trying to implicate you in any way. And despite his thoughts of conspiracy and private PMs gone amuck, I have neither sent or received any PMs regarding the situation.
PS, I posted a question for you down in the food forum.
Whatever happened to him, I am guilty of calling it to Rick's attention.
I told Rick, I don't care how much porn you guys post, or about your bra size threads, nipple size threads, or anything you guys come up with, I usually laugh right along with all of you. But I do care when it comes to vile and degrading material.
Rick did whatever he did, and I am grateful to him for it.
"The fallacy of your thesis is ones words/thoughts must be received/interpreted through the filter of one's pathology. To do otherwise is to miss the whole point. "
Not a thesis and not mine. Its a definition of a type of argument.
A simple example should suffice.
A person says a car is blue. Another person says, no that car isn't blue because you are an idiot. That is Ad Hominem. To say it in front of an audience is Ad Populum, and to say it to incite others to feel the same way is a fallacy of emotive language, which is the attempt to arouse unreasoned feelings. All of you are doing all three right now.
Unless the car isn't blue. Then it's just a statement of fact.