The guy is just wrong about the statistics. And the whole article is full of fallacies in the form of ad hominems and strawmen. And his conclusions are non sequiturs. He is either a schitty propagandist, or his audience are morons (written for lefties), or he was really drunk or high when he wrote this. I think more Americans have become more sophisticated in the past ten years, and this inane drivel doesn't work anymore, except in preaching to the unholy quire.
