Originally Posted by curdog4570
Originally Posted by RickyD
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by curdog4570
If FBI Agent’s “ interview notes “ are the Agents personal opinions and interpretations of the credibility of the person being interviewed, I can see why the FBI would not want those disclosed and I agree with them.But.... the actual transcripts of the interview should be released.

And the applications for the FISA warrants should be disclosed without redactions.


This.

Anything an agent does in regards to investigations are the property of the Bureau. Everyone of those docs could and likely should be released.

If nothing else they could show the inclination of the agent and how on track they were to doing their job for America or the marxists.


So...... if Agent Doofus interrogates YOU, Ricky D, you wouldn’t mind reading his impression of YOU in your local paper?

Until, or unless, an Agent has been accepted as an Expert Witness by a Trial Judge, his impression of the credibility of a witness is NOT relevant and damn sure should not be disclosed publically. Let the transcript stand alone on its own merit.

Throwing away the safeguards for citizens embodied in the Constitution is not justified based even on a worst case scenario of what we suspect has happened.

What they are releasing pertains to the sedition and treason against a sitting and duly elected President, Gene. American's are entitled to full disclosure up to the point of protecting REAL national security.

This is not an interview of some bank robber, or serial killer, who I would not feel required some extraordinary protection you believe may be found in the Bill of Rights. I'd like to know where that clause is. I never saw it before.

We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?

Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.