You seem upset.
I'm not bothered by your claims. If they are true, you are working with some high pressures.
It's just an observation, not a critique.
I think anyone's got a right to get defensive when other folks start armchair quarterbacking. You're usually more of a gentleman, but on this one you're kind of a dick and really have no idea what I've observed in my rifle.
If you want to have some useful input, tweak your QL inputs to match Ramshot's TAC data exactly (meaning powder charge, velocity, AND pressure) for a 24" barrel, then shorten that to a 16" and tell us what velocity it predicts. I think you'll be surprised.
I'm familiar with the chambering,the platform and propellants cited...which is why I simply cited burn rates as THE reddest of flags.
It ain't my lips and I'll happily watch the fhuqking show!...................(grin)
Stay away from me with your lips, sweetcheeks.
