With 40"of mass you are likely close but I'll say low 170's. I've been burned bad with photos...grin....
I scored him right at 165. He is only 16.5 inside. I am definitely not a score person but thought he would score more. IMO he is way more impressive than a spindly 190 buck. Plus he was a mature old buck.
Score means jack, it's just part of the story bit yeah - spread affecta beam length and obviously spread credit ...
If you like him, all that matters. Really cool buck....
PS - a spindly 190" buck would actually be really impressive with poor mass as his time length would be impressive...
