Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Originally Posted by Squidge


Has there ever been an impeachment in the Senate without any witnesses called?


The case & the evidence should have already been done in the HoR as support for bringing impeachment charges...........IOW, the case should already be fully prepared.

The case should simply be presented as is, to the Senate, not being able to call new witnesses unless the defense desires to call them since they were not allowed to call any in the HoR.

Prosecution should already have made their case.

MM

They didn't call witnesses in the House for this very reason, to accuse both the President and the Republican controlled Senate of a Cover-up.

If they allow Bolton to testify, the cover-up accusation is blown to smithereens, something the Democrats are hoping and praying the Republicans won't allow.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.