I have owned the Conquests in 4-14 x 44 and x 50 and use these on .22 lr Win target 52s. I also bought a Zeiss Diavari FL 4-16 x 50 on a .223 bolt gun. For target shooting on paper, both Conquests track well and the view thru the scope
is very good in my eyes. I love the side AO.

The Diavari cost 3 times the price of the Conquests and has a much better glass. The Conquests come close to the pricier Diavari, get either one. I don't know how the Conquests work for dialing multiple distances.
I also have three Leica scopes, the ER 2.5-10 x 42, Visus 2.5-10 x 42, and the ER 5 2-10 x 50. The Conquests to me rate close, but not quite the level of the 3 Leicas or the Diavari with Fluorite Lens.

I also use a 20 year old Swarovski 10 x 42 "Barrett" model made for the .50 BMG Barrett and a Hensoldt 10 x 42 on a Steyr SSG .308, and 1 Kahles CL 3-9 x 42, 2 Kahles 2-7 x 36. The Conquest scope come close to the view behind these exotic Euro glasses.