Kind of like shooting two shots and proclaiming you have 1/2 moa rifle. Two shots have little statistical relevance. Just as the date of first infection has little statistical relevance.
If that first infection stayed home and did not pass it on, it is moot. There is too much variability in infection rates to worry about when number 1 occurred. One person might infect 1000 others, while another might never pass it on
What is statistically relevant is when we hit 1000 diagnosed cases. That we can plot growth curves from.
The first death is relevant, as we can plot growth curves from that.
What we never saw was all of the associated deaths with those supposed infections happening in Nov and Dec.
