If things continue to go as they have been going, there will probably be legal doctrine named after me this year. There's a case in Texas, known as "Boeing", that my organization is challenging (in short, we are asking for documents under the public records act that show how foreign nations are funding Texas A&M and the foreign nation in this situation is arguing that under Boeing, their information should be considered a trade secret). The trial court already ruled that Boeing doesn't say what both Ken Paxton and the foreign nation say it says and we're about to go to the Texas Supreme Court.
So unless the Supreme Court overrules the trial court, Boeing will be replaced by Remsen. Means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
