main problem i see is that she is a woman and only 48. she could be on the bench for a long, long time and call me what you will, i don't trust women's critical thought processes. that said, a lot of men seem to have problems separating feelings from facts too so who the hell knows anymore. i agree that nominating a woman may make it harder for the democrats to skewer her but these POS's in Congress these days seem to outdo themselves stooping to new lows. so ya, put me in the maybe column.
Yup. And keep Cruz in the trenches fighting the fight, in the Senate. If I'm still alive then, Cruz in 2024 works for me. Joan Larsen or Amul Thapar would work well IMO to replace Ruthie. Joan clerked for Scalia and raghead Thapar is a strong constitutionalist with more actual time on the bench than all the others combined. A lot of the nominees have too much time in academia and the DC beltway...a big negative IMO.
