Originally Posted by OrangeOkie

Giuliani said that he was in possession of hundreds of affidavits that would prove voting fraud, but claimed that he could not present them to the press in order to preserve "national security."

Fisher disagreed with Giuliani's interpretation of the information disseminated during the press conference.

"So much of what he said was simply not true or has already been thrown out in court," Fisher said. (Rudy pointed out that Fisher was talking about a different lawsuit, not connected with the Trump team. When Fisher continued to talk over Rudy he called her a "liar!")

"How you viewed it depended largely on who you voted for," Carlson said. "Trump voters seemed hopeful that it might change the election results. The left and virtually every single person in all of the news media immediately dismissed it as an embarrassing clown show, as well as a threat to the Republic. The very same people who swore that Vladimir Putin's agents controlled the U.S. government called it a conspiracy theory."


No question how dirty and hypocritical the left is but that doesn’t mean that Rudy has anything that he can win in court with. The amount of evidence needed to get the SC to effectively overrule a National Election would be mind boggling and winning in the court of national perception would be the first step.
This seems a lot like the computer evidence of Biden being guilty of overseas kickbacks and his son being a spoiled lowlife crackhead (two things we already knew) the rest of the rumors never bared fruit.
If it were up to me there guilty as sin but you’re not going to get a court to overturn an election based on what you and me believe.

Last edited by TheLastLemming76; 11/19/20.