This comes up periodically. Generally when someone asks, "which mounts and rings for my pre 64?", I'm the first to say DD's. Well, not for my H&H rifles. I tried them a long time ago and they hang over the ejection port. Well, the rear mount does anyway, so DD's are not an option for me. How about Talley lightweights?:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Yeah, well you get the idea. I've been of the opinion that Winchester thought those cut-outs for extra clearance of the longer H&H cartridges were put in the top of the receiver bridges for a reason. This is why I chose to use weaver style mounts instead. I will use steel mounts, meaning Leupold PRW:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Or in a pinch, you can use the Warne mounts. One word of caution though, if you choose Warne, the front mount is too long. It extends past the front edge of the receiver, and it looks like garbage. No thought was put into the aesthetics of those bases:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

This is kind of a pisser, but can be remedied:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

File it flat:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Polish it out and then re-blue:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Install the rings and scope and you are in business:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]





Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA