Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by steve4102
Do you believe a Government has the obligation to protect its citizens?

Let’s say that someone is batscit crazy (medical term), he has been in and out of mental Heath facilities for years. Let’s say he is extremely violent and has been convicted of assault or worse, more than once. Let’s say he now a free man, a bat schit crazy, violent, free man.

Do you believe the Government should allow him access to a firearm?

What about religion. If a “religion” preaches death to non-believers, stones non-believers in the streets, mutilates the genitals of their children, throws homosexuals off of roof tops, commits mass murder all in the name of Their God, should they be allowed to Freely practice that religion here in the USA ?

If he's a danger to the public, he belongs in prison or secured in a hospital for the insane. When in neither of those places (because there's not enough evidence to put him there after due process was afforded), he has the right to arms.


Not if that person is a felon.


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.