I think stopping legislation before it becomes law is more cost effective that trying to overturn it in the courts.
Wayne knows for sure that (attempting to) stop it before it becomes law is waaay TF more profitable than trying to overturn it in court, because you get to do it again year after year. You win the wrong court case and the gravy train suddenly derails.
So litigation is more cost effective than lobbying? Get back to me on that after the Bolsheviks ram gun law after gun laws down our throats. Legal costs will make Wayne’s spending habits seem like pocket change.
SAF (court cases) has produced a return for gun owners on its meager budget this century far in excess of what we've received from the bloated NRA. That's the definition of cost effective.
And please explain how this "Lobbying" is going to change said Bolsheviks' minds? I'm all ears.
But Wayne appreciates your support.
