It isn't surprising that Derek Sloan is the only MP trying to raise political capital from his opposition to vaccines and lockdowns.
After all this is the same guy who panders to ultra-conservative religious groups by opposing abortion and same-sex marriage, attacks LGBT groups, and has accepted campaign donations from white supremacist groups.
This is the same MP that the Conservative party booted from caucus and now sits as an independent MP. He is a pariah in his own former party so he really has nothing to lose. And his extremist views do play well with fellow extremists who send him money.
As for his claims that the three doctors that he dug up represent the views of many other doctors, this claim is false.
For example, with regards to Dr. Byram Bridle, his fellow immunologists have stated that he misinterprets studies and data; that his claims are unsubstantiated; and that his views do not align with the mainstream. In other words, they are HIS views alone, and not those of "many" other doctors.
The majority of doctors Canada-wide do not agree with these three doctors.
And Derek Sloan is basically just an ostracized independent "shock-jock" politician who sensationalizes and exaggerates issues to gain support from others with extreme views.
Lots of nonsense in this ^^ The doctors that agree with the three Sloan had with him are in the tens of thousands.....literally. The doctor from Texas that testified before the senate a couple weeks ago is the most published doctor in the history of medicine. He agrees with the three Canadians on all points. His credentials speak for themselves. You can discount him all you want, but that doesnt make him wrong. The data on HQ and ivermectin has been peer reviewed now. Why you would continue to disagree with doctors who are pointing that out is tantamount to denying science...
For some strange reason people still aren’t willing to consider the very thing they were asking for in the first place. Most arguments against the use of Ivermectin, HQ, etc, etc as treatment or preventative to C19 has been a lack of Peer reviewed studies. Now those studies are starting to pile up with positive results, yet people still want to ignore it and call others conspiracy theorists. I don’t get it.
Even a non-supporter of Derrick Sloan can recognize he was a perfect sacrificial lamb for Erin Otoole to offer up to more liberal voters. His participation shouldn’t take away from what’s happening to doctors and scientists and the growing scientific evidence.
Saddlegun
If anything, you’re proving that political bias is interfering with scientific debate.
