Oh Balls.
Tats have been around since the same time piercings were no doubt. Does it bother some folks because a person has earings or nipple rings, etc?
Some of the worse azzhats I've ever worked with had no tattoos and vice versa.
Matter of personal preference and makes no difference to me, and were I an employer a tat (or piercing) would certainly not scare me away from hiring a person with a great resume. Would you folks not hire someone because they wore Levi's instead of Wranglers?
Neither would I disown a good child just because they got some ink, were I to have any kids that is. It certainly won't stop me from leaving something for my nieces and nephews, a couple of which I know have some tats.
No wonder I end up taking a few days away from this place every now and then.
Sheesh, hold into the 1950's.
