Originally Posted by copperking81
I'm half being a smart azz... and half not. I don't think a protracted insurgency could work in this country then or now. Our women are not, and have never been, totally subjected like they are in Afghanistan and Iraq. They'd eventually get tired of living the life of an insurgent's wife and start ratting us out, denying sanctuary needed for an insurgency to succeed.

As to the south and the strategy they chose... I’m sure they thought they could lick the north in conventional warfare. They wouldn't have tried if they didn't.

Makes sense. The other thing working against the South would have been in place homesteads and farms to be targeted Vs. a Vietnam or Afghanistan which was mostly modern day nomads or pheasants that were harder to target.