I appreciate all the responses I’m a fan of Burris lots of bang for the buck. I have a Sightron S2 on an old 30-06 that has held zero for at least 10 years of young hunter abuse. I like Trijicon but that reticle is goofy so might not make the cut.
My original impression was that you had to spend more than $500 to get a substantial improvement on the Burris FF2 4.5-14x42 that is about $200. So is that the case? do I leave the Burris on the 7 RM? The reason for looking is I have to send back a Leupold 4-5-14x50 that lost zero, I’m pretty sure I can get almost $500 selling it after repair. The Burris was the emergency replacement before elk hunting. I coincidentally got the same question asked by a new hunter this week figured the fire might give me the right answers for both.
