Even a slight understanding of the academic realm gives the sorry picture - her degree in education is an Ed.D from a third rate university program and her "dissertation" is a very weak report on essential nothingness.
A true and worthy Ph.D. requires a dissertation that breaks new ground in the discipline - deals with theoretical questions/issues in the field. Her final paper is nothing at all like a dissertation.
On that basis, only an insecure or vain fool would insist that she be called "doctor", a matter that is greatly laughable among those who have earned the appellation. I know nothing about her except what she wrote, but truly doubt that she is capable of leading or directing anything of any significance.
