Originally Posted by Teal
Originally Posted by 45_100
[Houston2]Reading some of these msm news flashes coming across my phone screen shows that a lot of elites are scared crapless about more potential neutering of the federal government alphabet agencies with future scotus rulings that are on the docket.

As they should be, this has the potential to significantly change the way the federal government operates. If Congress has to approve rules and regulations proposed by unelected bureaucrats it MIGHT make Congress more accountable.

What I like - it should also clog up Congress with so much BS, they get only 1/2 done with the list of things to screw us over on. Right now - culturally, a super busy congress means they can't screw up things as fast.[/quote]


I'm thinking, certainly HOPING, that the Opinion goes much further than Congress approving or disapproving of the alphabet regulators..... They already do that 'tacitly'...

What the Opinion should say, IMHO, is that CONGRESS must write and vote on the rules and regulations..... IF these Rules and Regulations carry with them, requirement, penalty, punishment, consequences for not adhering to, then they are defacto LAW, and only Congress can MAKE new or change existing Law... Congress is NOT in the position of approving or disapproving Law written by some other party....

There's a reason Congress is happy with the current process......

Can you imagine someone writing Law that genuinely thinks too many troops could make Guam capsize....

Again IMHO

Last edited by Muffin; 06/28/22.

"...A man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box..." Frederick Douglass, 1867

( . Y . )