Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Maybe so, but you are plain stupid. OF COURSE the 35 was IOC years ago, otherwise it would not be deployed with the services you moron. My point, which your alcoholic/cough syrup addled brain failed to capture was the 35 DID NOT MEET OPEVAL requirements (just like for example the Hornet failed OPEVAL yet we deployed it anyway) and it still has a crapload of critical failures. Man you are truly an idiot.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

So we agree you didn't understand that the F-35 met IOC years ago but you still used those words in your post and now want to use different words.

Originally Posted by ... Old Man George trying to figure out how to type words
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

Man, you are a f ucking moon. IOC and OPEVAL are two different issues. The Hornet failed OPEVAL yet it still IOC'd. two different issues. The 35 still has literally dozens of critical failure issues. Stick to what you know as obviously it isn't this

A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”