Originally Posted by jorgeI
The 22 is another example of going WAY over budget, but the biggest difference between it at the 35, is that it met IOC AND SOW expectations, whereas the 35 (look at the videos above for startters0 wasn't even close

Originally Posted by jorgeI
OF COURSE the 35 was IOC years ago, otherwise it would not be deployed with the services you moron. .

Originally Posted by JohnBurns
So we agree you didn't understand that the F-35 met IOC years ago but you still used those words in your post and now want to use different words.

Originally Posted by jorgeI
Man, you are a f ucking moon. IOC and OPEVAL are two different issues. The Hornet failed OPEVAL yet it still IOC'd. two different issues. The 35 still has literally dozens of critical failure issues. [Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

Well the record is pretty clear on your posts.

Maybe we can move on and you can tell the class the "literally dozens of critical failure issues" of the Block 3 F-35s.

A numbered list instead of bullets point would help everyone out.

[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]

John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.