Yeah, we goof often, and we're always assured that an enthusiastic jeering section is eagerly waiting to celebrate our stumbles when we haven't stumbled yet, our falls when we haven't fallen yet �
� and to roll around in hysterically gleeful tut-tutting whenever we exhibit normal human weakness or make a simple booboo.
It's quite all right for our critics not to know (or to bother with) such things as the distinction between there and they're, but even a simple typo can dang near be a tar-and-feather offense if an editor lets it slip-by under a writer's byline
Ken
It isn't about hysterically gleeful tut-tutting or the correct usage of there and they're......
Were all men and women here and were all prone to making mistakes,some more than others...But to put all the marbles into one corner based on just one opinion,reguardles of who it is from...
Is absurd!!!Gunwriter or not...
There is a ton of monkeys out there never heard of with 10X the experience alot of gunwriters have or had..Not to knock gunwriters...I like to read also once in a while and find alot of it ,humorous.
But as you know...What sells is what sells..Few if any ever challenge it from there own experiences,right or wrong.
Jayco
