Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Quote
If NICS was compelled to reply to EVERY gun transaction in the U.S., it would crash, and they know it.


Surely merely a question of adding computing space, and if denials/whatever required a human in the process at some point, Obama wouldn't care if that process stretched out for months.

Quote
And most private transactions are INTRASTATE, which brings up the whole issue of "federalism" if the feds try to regulate them.


Most private transactions are that way in part because interstate private sale/transfers are illegal. Law-abiding folks usually obey laws.

But in this case, since the Feds already regulate commercial interstate AND intrastate sales involving FFL dealers via background checks etc, passing a ban on undocumented private sales would merely make private sales subject to the exact same regulations already in effect for commercial sales.

Birdwatcher



You are a smart guy and a gifted writer.So..... please take a look at the Federal Register, and pick out a proposed new regulation by a Federal Agency, or a recently published one.The FAA is the one I'm most familiar with, but it makes no difference in this excercise.

You will see a "federalism statement". It states the Gov't lawyers' reasoning as to WHY this regulation does NOT abridge the rules against federalism.

YOU write a federalism statement explaining how a Federal Agency can lawfully become involved in Curdog selling Birdwatcher a firearm when we both live in Texas.


Never holler whoa or look back in a tight place