|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 254
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 254 |
I purchased a new pr of Zeiss 10x42 SFs this summer and I find myself reaching for those almost all of the time. I specifically bought them for an elk hunt in CO where the extra power came in handy. But now back home in MN, in the woods, looking across cuts, and even in the farm land, I am still using them over the Leicas. Example, I was in the treestand with the 7x42s and spotting a buck across the ravine making his way through the woods. Only 100 yards away but a lot in between us. As I'm watching him I thought I wish I had my Zeiss because I'd be able to see his antlers and judge him much better than I can right now. It would seem almost sacrelig to get rid of 7x42s living in Minnesota but if they are collecting dust, what's the point of keeping them? Anyone else experienced this before?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,085
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,085 |
I find that I always (eventually) find a time and place for good optics, even if they are not my first pick.
Unless you need to sell them, I would hold on to them. I'm betting a time will come in the future that you will be glad you had them. Dusty or not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,665 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,665 Likes: 6 |
You've only got to please you. If the 10x's are what you feel you'll use, use the 10x and peddle the 7x.
I find the 6x and 7x's quite superior when scanning brush/woods. If most of your viewing is with the nekkid eye and using the 10x to have a closer look, that's a bit of a different application and the 10x makes some sense.
WWP53D
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,846
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,846 |
I find the 6x and 7x's quite superior when scanning brush/woods. If most of your viewing is with the nekkid eye and using the 10x to have a closer look, that's a bit of a different application and the 10x makes some sense. This is my take. I would say that my 7X42s gather dust for 75% of my hunting; but, they are superior for that other 25%.
_________________________________________________________________________ “Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 55
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 55 |
Absolutely keep the Leica 7X42. I'll add that you might not like to write that check again in the future when you need a tool you once owned.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 592
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 592 |
I generally use my Zeiss 8x45 with the rangefinder, but I just can't bring myself to sell the 7x42 Leica's.
Do or do not, there is no try.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,513 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,513 Likes: 2 |
They aint eating anything so keep them.
Life can be rough on us dreamers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,933 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,933 Likes: 1 |
Yes, you should see them. Cheaply. To me.
There are 2 rules to success:
1. Never tell everything that you know.
|
|
|
|
432 members (12344mag, 1badf350, 22kHornet, 160user, 22magnut, 1OntarioJim, 42 invisible),
1,544
guests, and
1,166
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,098
Posts18,522,238
Members74,026
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|