Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Idaho rancher killed by deputies over a wounded bull.

The verdict was unsealed the day Spence took the case.He does not loose.

The verdict was unsealed the day Spence took the case.He does not loose.

The verdict was unsealed the day Spence took the case.He does not loose.

And what exactly is Spence going to loose, his belt?

Loose/loose before Christmas for someone.

Loose/loose?

Idaho State Police and the FBI are still investigating an officer-involved shooting in Adams County that killed and a man.

Jack Yantis was shot and killed by two Adams County deputies, after Yantis was called to put his bull down that had been hurt in a car accident.

Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden, who is the special prosecutor in the case, says they are working cooperatively with the federal government on the investigation. “The important point here is this, we only have one opportunity to get this right and we need to be very diligent in reviewing the information, taking the time necessary to make sure that we understand the facts.”

Wasden says they also have to be very careful at giving out information to the public because it could harm the jury pool, if the case does go to court

"So, if I understand the meaning of your posts correctly, you believe that you have learned enough from this thread to justify your personally killing deputies, had the deceased rancher been a relative. Is that correct?"

Change "from this thread" to "newspaper articles" and I'll give you a short answer.

Yes, depending on his exact relationship to me. Were he a distant relative, I'd let a family member closer to him have the honor.

lack of concern about the law or the judicial system if your own private concerns are involved.

If you didn't wear a badge, then that's for the better. You were not a good candidate. Thanks for clearing that up.

You don't meet the involuntary criteria this instant, but your predisposition is toward violent tendencies and your posts evidence a lack of concern about the law or the judicial system if your own private concerns are involved. You also are the kind of person police can use as Exhibit A when they talk about nut cases walking around in public flying under the radar, yet predisposed to taking "lone wolf" actions if the stars and planets line up a certain way one day.

I have no dog in the hunt in terms of what happens to the deputies in this case. I have more confidence in the rule of law and the judicial system than Internet forum blather, though.

No, I am not threatening him with government intervention. If my post is interpreted that way, then I clarify it by affirmatively saying that is not my intent. I specifically stated that his words do not amount to an immediate problem, but they do seem to set out a mindset that, if combined with other things down the road, could be a problem down the road (not that I am going to waste any of my time on it). Of course, it all could be Internet bravado, too.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/11/gc-dilsaver/king-men-downed-barney-fifes/

Wow, dude. If taken at your word, you are flirting with the “danger to others” standard for an involuntary commitment for a mental health evaluation, which comes with a free firearm disability. You also probably do not comprehend the hypocrisy of condemning police officers for making a split-second lethal force decision when an auto crash investigation went sideways while having no problem being a judge, jury and premeditated executioner based on unsworn hearsay gleaned from a newspaper! Did I read somewhere that you used to wear a badge? If so, I’m glad you gave that up, because your mental predisposition appears to be worse than that of the people whom you routinely condemn on these pages.

But if I ever find the son of a bitch who accused me of being a cop, I'm taking back my vow of non-violence.

lol Your whole tone is threatening. Nice try though.