24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,170
Likes: 5
E
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
E
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,170
Likes: 5
True.

As far as the complainers go.....

[Linked Image]



Life Member SCI
Life Member DSC
Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association

Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell

Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard

Ken
GB1

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Yikes eek


Gerry.
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,633
Likes: 10
L
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
L
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,633
Likes: 10
Simple 260 or 6.5-06 in a ultralite model would be sweet .. just thinking aloud

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,168
Likes: 16
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,168
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by shrapnel

What a colossal waste of time when there is 1000 yard 243 already on the campfire, proving the lack of need of all this wasted discussion...


That sand up in there has got to itch and burn. blush

Originally Posted by moosemike
Originally Posted by shrapnel

What a colossal waste of time when there is 1000 yard 243 already on the campfire, proving the lack of need of all this wasted discussion...


I heard about that. I also read on that thread that the .300 Weatherby isn't a long range cartridge.


LOL.

No you didn't read that nor did you hear that but I have no doubt you "felt" that. cool

Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
I know there is a niche market for ultra performance at any cost, whether it be automotive, computer hardware, or ballistics. But most of us mortals have to settle a bit in the performance department as performance increases at a rate inversely proportional to cost.

Ultra-capacity cartridges are of little interest for ranges inside 600 or 700 yards. Extended ranges typically mean heavy for caliber bullets with high ballistic coefficeints.

Mule Deer has shown us years ago how to acheive that elusive 3200 fps with a 140 in the 264 at sane pressure.

But such loads are still very scarce in the load manuals. While the 6.5 Nosler exceeds 3200 fps by slim margins.

There is a significant performance gain in the 7 mm magnums when increasing capacity from that of the 7 rem/wea mag to capacity of 7MM STW/3OO Wea.

That performance gain is much diminished when bore diameter is reduced to 264.


I didn't really want to like the 26 Nosler but the SAAMI chamber is designed much better than the SAAMI .264 Win Mag, specifically the throat.

The 26 Nosler throat is still not right but won't die nearly as fast as a SAAMI .264 Win Mag throat. 3200fps/ 140gr bullet will come easier (26 Nosler) and at lower pressure, which will also benefit throat life.

Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by BobinNH
DF: I know you like those big 6.5's... smile

Gonna get a Weatherby?

Naw...

The 26 is big enough, burns enough powder, makes enough noise...

I have only one Wby, a Mk V and it wears a Brux 7RM tube in a Wby Express McWoody. That's enough Wby for me...

Jorge and Fotis are real Wby fans...

DF


All this talk about hot rod 6.5mm is making me think there might be something there. I might just have to give one a go. laugh

Wonder if it will kill an elk?


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Originally Posted by JohnBurns


I didn't really want to like the 26 Nosler but the SAAMI chamber is designed much better than the SAAMI .264 Win Mag, specifically the throat.

The 26 Nosler throat is still not right but won't die nearly as fast as a SAAMI .264 Win Mag throat. 3200fps/ 140gr bullet will come easier (26 Nosler) and at lower pressure, which will also benefit throat life.



This is the first time I have heard someone saying the 26 Nosler potentially having longer barrel life than the 264 WM. Care to estimate how many rounds the "average" 264 WM, 26 Nosler and 6.5/300 Wby would last?


Gerry.
IC B2

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,313
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,313
500-800?

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
I have more than that through my 264 WM but recently found out the throat has gotten quite long.


Gerry.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
I
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
The original barrel on my Win 70 classic lasted 2500 rounds, but 1000 of those were 3000 fps w/ 100 gr 0r 120 gr ballistic tips and IMR 4831 as ground squirrel loads.

About five years, for me.

The only way the barrel on a 26 Nosler or a 6.5-300 Wea will outlast a 264 barrel; is to hold the velocity of the bigger cartridge to 264 levels. As John Burns stated in his post.

The 26 Nosler pushing a 140 to 3200 fps with 869 will run at a lower peak pressure/flame temp than will the 264 pushing the same bullet to 3200 fps with Magnum or Retumbo.

But, how many purchasers of the two larger capacity cartridges will settle for running them at 264 velocities? Most will be striving to hit 3250 at a minimum or 3300 fps.



People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Interesting. Most would want to hot rod the two bigger rounds but I would be happy with longer barrel life and run them at 264 WM speeds.

I have used mostly Retumbo since building the 264 WM in 2008 but can't complain with how long the barrel has lasted. Still shoots decently but I need a lot more powder now to get the speed I used to.


Gerry.
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,313
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,313
Like some others have posted here. I would run them max as it is a hunting rifle and I wouldn't run that many rounds through it each year. Probably last my life time, but 223 dog town rifles are a different story. smile

IC B3

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
I
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by gerrygoat
Interesting. Most would want to hot rod the two bigger rounds but I would be happy with longer barrel life and run them at 264 WM speeds.

I have used mostly Retumbo since building the 264 WM in 2008 but can't complain with how long the barrel has lasted. Still shoots decently but I need a lot more powder now to get the speed I used to.


Yours is not a unique mindset. I do not run my 6-284 or my 22-243AI nearly as hard as I might. But they still exceed the rifles' original chamberings of 243 Win and 22-259 Rem.

Dr Howell promoted a whole series of oversized cartridges, not to maximize velocity, but to reduce chaber pressures.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 24,239
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 24,239
I've got a 257 Weatherby and a 270 Weatherby. I've been hoping for something to fill that performance gap.

EUREKA !!!!


Never holler whoa or look back in a tight place
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,366
3
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
3
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,366


Another great new cartridge is the 22-204... [/quote]

Yeah, circa 1958 ........

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 414
J
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 414
The .264 Win Mag seems to be making a comeback.

The 6.5x68mm is better than the 26 Nosler and better than the 6.5-300 weatherby.

John, how do you feel about below:

Originally Posted by CanadianLefty
You're right, the most direct comparison is against the 264 Win. Mag.

Craig Boddington once wrote in Safari Rifles about the 6.5x68mm and said,
Originally Posted by Craig Boddington
...the velocities are wonderful-about the same as or better than the .264 Winchester Magnum without the magazine-capacity-devouring belt.


If that's the case (at or better than the .264 Win. Mag), how might it compare to the .270 Win at long range?

Can it use a shorter barrel like the .270 Win eg 22-23" or as you and I suspect, must it have at least 24+" to produce significantly higher velocities to gain an edge over the 270?



"The end of the human race will be that it will eventually die of civilization"-- Emerson

Support outdoor sports and our hunting-conservationist heritage; hunt with high morals and ethical standards
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

575 members (160user, 12344mag, 222Sako, 257 mag, 1beaver_shooter, 1_deuce, 72 invisible), 2,190 guests, and 1,143 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,567
Posts18,531,811
Members74,039
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.076s Queries: 43 (0.026s) Memory: 0.8797 MB (Peak: 0.9729 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-23 16:02:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS