|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578
Campfire Sage
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578 |
![[Linked Image]](http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w188/TheRealHawkeye/IMG_0495_zpsafbkok22.jpg) Shot it today for the first time. It's not going to replace my Glock 17, but no jams in a hundred rounds of FMJ. Haven't gotten around to trying hollow points, yet. I like it. If it was all I had, no doubt I'd feel pretty confident in my abilities with it after enough range time and rounds down range. Nice to have just because it's a classic design, regardless.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,497
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,497 |
I have sent FMJ, HP and lead through one of the alloy models.
It just kept on shooting whatever I loaded in the magazines.
Factory and after market Mags too.
Some spelling errors can be corrected by a vowel movement.
~ MOLON LABE ~
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,497
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,497 |
I have sent FMJ, HP and lead through one of the alloy models.
It just kept on shooting whatever I loaded in the magazines.
Factory and after market Mags too.
Some spelling errors can be corrected by a vowel movement.
~ MOLON LABE ~
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,059
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,059 |
I'm not a big fan of the 92 design, but I'd take the Taurus version before a Beretta.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 454
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 454 |
I'm not a big fan of the 92 design, but I'd take the Taurus version before a Beretta. Why is that ? Just curious, Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,544
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,544 |
The safety is on the frame instead of on the slide.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578
Campfire Sage
|
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578 |
I'm not a big fan of the 92 design, but I'd take the Taurus version before a Beretta. Thats how I feel, too, just based on the frame mounted safety.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,059
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,059 |
I'm not a big fan of the 92 design, but I'd take the Taurus version before a Beretta. Why is that ? Just curious, Mike The safety arrangement. Frame mounted, and swipe down to release.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 454
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 454 |
I see,
I assume then that y'all prefer no safety ?
Just for the record,I do too.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578
Campfire Sage
|
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578 |
I see,
I assume then that y'all prefer no safety ?
Just for the record,I do too.
Mike On a striker fired handgun, sure. The M9, however, is a hammer fired double action, so at least should have a decocker. If it has a safety, too, it should be 1911 style, as that's a natural motion, and it should be on the frame, so as not to interfere with slide operation.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661 |
It's interesting that the Beretta 92 started with a frame mounted safety. The Army asked for a decocker, and Beretta lacking in imagination went with the decocker that everyone had been ussing since the 1930's and that's how they ended up with the slide mounted safety/de-cocker.
Taurus came up with the frame mounted decocker and very quickly H&K copied it for their USP line of pistols.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661 |
Taurus quality is very hit and miss, yet the PT92AF seems to always be a good gun. I suspect it's because the PT92AF is used by several military's and LE agencies across the world. They probably hold Taurus' feet to the fire on quality.
Where with their other guns, Taurus seems to only be interested in quantity and low price.
It's too bad, Taurus has a world class production facility and they're capable of doing first rate work; they just choose not to.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578
Campfire Sage
|
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,578 |
Taurus quality is very hit and miss, yet the PT92AF seems to always be a good gun. I suspect it's because the PT92AF is used by several military's and LE agencies across the world. They probably hold Taurus' feet to the fire on quality.
Where with their other guns, Taurus seems to only be interested in quantity and low price.
It's too bad, Taurus has a world class production facility and they're capable of doing first rate work; they just choose not to. Yeah, I wouldn't buy any other Taurus handgun besides the PT92AF. I do have their replica of the Winchester Model 63 which is of very high quality, coming close to the old Winchester-made originals. I also have their Model 62, which is also excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
560 members (007FJ, 02bfishn, 160user, 10gaugeman, 16gage, 1Longbow, 62 invisible),
2,527
guests, and
1,294
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,434
Posts18,470,811
Members73,931
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image from images7.memedroid.com]](https://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED555/651dcaab819c9.jpeg)
