24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,190
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,190
Washington want the electoral college because the parties only have to spend money in the swing states and sometimes just specific counties or districts.

I'd prefer a popular vote and make them have to spread their money all over . . .


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 3
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 3
Quote
Popular vote goes against everything the founders did. We are a nation of states. States send representatives to Congress and states send delegates to the electoral college to do the bidding of their respective states.


The electoral college made sense when communication took weeks to get messages and vote totals in from across the country. It does nothing anymore to help smaller states. Having 2 senators in each state regardless of state size takes care of that.

What the electoral college does today is keep people away from the polls. With instant communication people already know the outcomes in the east hours before the polls close in the west. I'm convinced it hurts conservatives much more than liberals. California and New York are very large states with a large majority of liberal voters. Same with several others

But even though they are in the minority, there are still an awful lot of conservative voters there simply because there are so many people. It makes zero sense for them to show up at the polls, because those votes mean nothing. Even if every conservative in those 2 states voted the Democrats will win easily. You see the same in strong conservative states. Many conservatives don't vote because they know the conservative candidate will easily win without their help.

But if we based the election simply on the popular vote those votes could, and I think would make the difference.

In every election since I've been old enough to pay attention there have only been about 8-10 states that the outcome was in question. This makes voter fraud much easier. You only have to concentrate efforts in a handful of cities in a handful of states to make a difference.

Despite the outcome of the 2000 election I think Bush wins easily on popular vote if the electoral college doesn't keep people at home.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Originally Posted by tpcollins
Washington want the electoral college because the parties only have to spend money in the swing states and sometimes just specific counties or districts.

I'd prefer a popular vote and make them have to spread their money all over . . .


Really stupid idea.


Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Originally Posted by LostHighway
What's the down side to the most votes wins?


If you had any conception of a Constitutional Republic and you'd know the answer.


Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,268
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,268
I like how the big thicket region doesn't contain the big thicket.


Otto is my co-pilot.
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,519
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,519
Originally Posted by JMR40
Quote
Popular vote goes against everything the founders did. We are a nation of states. States send representatives to Congress and states send delegates to the electoral college to do the bidding of their respective states.


The electoral college made sense when communication took weeks to get messages and vote totals in from across the country. It does nothing anymore to help smaller states. Having 2 senators in each state regardless of state size takes care of that.

What the electoral college does today is keep people away from the polls. With instant communication people already know the outcomes in the east hours before the polls close in the west. I'm convinced it hurts conservatives much more than liberals. California and New York are very large states with a large majority of liberal voters. Same with several others

But even though they are in the minority, there are still an awful lot of conservative voters there simply because there are so many people. It makes zero sense for them to show up at the polls, because those votes mean nothing. Even if every conservative in those 2 states voted the Democrats will win easily. You see the same in strong conservative states. Many conservatives don't vote because they know the conservative candidate will easily win without their help.

But if we based the election simply on the popular vote those votes could, and I think would make the difference.

In every election since I've been old enough to pay attention there have only been about 8-10 states that the outcome was in question. This makes voter fraud much easier. You only have to concentrate efforts in a handful of cities in a handful of states to make a difference.

Despite the outcome of the 2000 election I think Bush wins easily on popular vote if the electoral college doesn't keep people at home.


How enlightening that it was about slow communication and not keeping heavily populated states from running rough shod all over the smaller ones.

Quick questions - since polls will still close in the East earlier than the West, how does a popular vote solve the "problem"? About 70% of the nation's population lies east of the Mississippi River. Seems to me the early reports out of the east would suppress the vote in the West just as much.



"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,015
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,015
I propose it remain based on population, but you get a deduct based upon state debt.


$$$ TRUMP AT THE PUMP 2024 $$$
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,838
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,838
Sounds like a great idea having equal population between states.

What method should we use to lower the other 49 to Wyomings 586,000?


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,015
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,015
D-Con


$$$ TRUMP AT THE PUMP 2024 $$$
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,926
Likes: 2
I
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,926
Likes: 2
There are a few things that matter besides the presidential election.

The map shown in the OP strips a butt load of senators from the people of Wyoming, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, etc.

Our Senators are the only reason we have any say in the federal gov't at all. In the Senate, Idaho has as much vote as Cali, or New York. The Senate is where real conservative states hold some power.

The Senate is where Federal appointees are rejected or accepted. The Senate is where international treaties, such as the "International Arms Treaty" are ratified.

The OP's map is a Socialist's wet dream come true. It would vastly accelerate the US slide toward Communism.

This is one of the differences between the Republic as envisioned by the Founders, and a Democracy where the mob rules with what ever feels good this week.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
IC B3

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
There are a few things that matter besides the presidential election.

The map shown in the OP strips a butt load of senetors from the people of Wyoming, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, etc.

Our Senetors are the only reason we have any say in the federal gov't at all. In the Senate, Idaho has as much vote as Cali, or New York. The Senate is where real conservative states hold some power.

The Senate is where Federal appointees are rejected or accepted. The Senate is where international treaties, such as the "International Arms Treaty" are ratified.

The OP's map is a Socialist's wet dream come true. It would vastly accelerate the US slide toward Communism.

This is one of the differences between the Republic as envisioned by the Founders, and a Democracy where the mob rules with what ever feels good this week.


This someone has a clue. That so many others don't is a reflection on what passes for education and an "enlightened voter" these days.


Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Originally Posted by LostHighway
Originally Posted by WyColoCowboy
Hell No.

Popular vote goes against everything the founders did. We are a nation of states. States send representatives to Congress and states send delegates to the electoral college to do the bidding of their respective states.

The OP's map does nothing but weaken the small states and transfer that power to the more populated states.


So you be in favor of all states having equal electoral votes? Wyoming and Vermont get the same as California, and Texas. I argue the current system largely ignores the small states. Follow the money to the battle ground states such as Ohio (18), and Florida (29)with it's large electoral votes. Anyone think in the general election the presidential candidates have restless nights wondering if they are going to win Wyoming (3)or Vermont (3)? They irrelevant and that is not power. In a tight race if was a popular vote different story.


Half the population resides in 40 metro area's. If we went to popular vote, no one out side those cites would ever see a candidate.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,048
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,048
Loose the EC or let DC become a State of the union and you can bend over and kiss your ass, and what's left of our free country, good-bye.

Curtains.
Fat lady sings.
Death knell.
Stick a fork in it.
Done.


Last edited by Archerhunter; 02/21/16.

BAN THE RAINBOW FLAG!
PERVERTS OFFEND ME!

"When is penguin season, daddy? I wanna go kill a penguin!"
---- 4 yr old Archerhuntress

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,190
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,190
Originally Posted by 4ager
Originally Posted by tpcollins
Washington want the electoral college because the parties only have to spend money in the swing states and sometimes just specific counties or districts.

I'd prefer a popular vote and make them have to spread their money all over . . .


Really stupid idea.


Well Bull**** . . . I'd like to see the electoral votes broken down and distributed by percentages (like some primaries) instead of winner takes all. For example, California has 55 electoral votes. Lets say 62% vote democrat - they get 62% of 55 or about 34 votes. And 38% vote republican so they get 38% or the remaining 21 votes.

That way all voters are heard and politicians have to really work for all of the votes rather than assuming the democrats can ignore campaigning in CA as it's a given blue state. I'd like to see the CA republicans get some sort of credit for going to the polls and voting for their choice (aka - popular vote).

The electoral college just makes it easier to know where to go to cheat . . .

Last edited by tpcollins; 02/21/16.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,176
L
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
L
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,176
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
There are a few things that matter besides the presidential election.
The map shown in the OP strips a butt load of senators from the people of Wyoming, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, etc.
Our Senators are the only reason we have any say in the federal gov't at all. In the Senate, Idaho has as much vote as Cali, or New York. The Senate is where real conservative states hold some power.
The Senate is where Federal appointees are rejected or accepted. The Senate is where international treaties, such as the "International Arms Treaty" are ratified.
The OP's map is a Socialist's wet dream come true. It would vastly accelerate the US slide toward Communism.
This is one of the differences between the Republic as envisioned by the Founders, and a Democracy where the mob rules with what ever feels good this week.


Stay on track. This thread is about how the president is elected.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

516 members (1lesfox, 10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 12344mag, 16gage, 160user, 55 invisible), 2,715 guests, and 1,196 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,365
Posts18,488,160
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.147s Queries: 45 (0.007s) Memory: 0.8838 MB (Peak: 0.9853 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 03:47:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS