|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638 |
Well hell yeah, because NOBODY has ever posted a pic of a Barnes that didn't expand...
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle. I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
And your point is? If a bullet flattens out and fails to penetrate, the animal may be lost or in the case of dangerous game, only serve to turn a hunt into a dangerous situation. In contrast if a Barnes fails to expand (highly unlikely with the bigger bores) it still punches through and makes TWO holes, still leading to bleeding out and death. But quick, go roust the other Barnes haters....
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,614
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,614 |
I've shot a grand total of two buffalo - both with a 300gr Nosler Partition for the 1st shot and the rounds in the magazine were loaded with 300gr solids.
The first buffalo was shot at less than 40 yards facing me with his head up and the bullet struck at the junction where the neck joined the body. When the bullet hit his heads jerked higher and did his rear legs -- same moves used by rodeo bulls. He hid the ground hard and after 15 or 20 seconds he gave the death bellow. The bullet, which the skinner found and gave to me, had broken the neck where it dips down and then continued toward taking the heart. I'never seen anything hit the so fast or so hard.
The 2nd was a double lung shot taken at about the same distance. On impact the buffalo threw up his head spun away and ran about 29 yards and hit the ground dead.
I've only ever had two animals run very far = the first was a large zebra stallion that took two solid hits from the same .375 I used on the buffalo - the first shot was a running broadside at 100+ yards that was a solid broadside hit that rolled him over but he barely broke stride and the 2nd shot placed just behid the shoulder staggered him until we ealked up and I put a finishing shot into his neck.
The hardest to bring down from my limited experience was a large sable bull - 4 shots starting at a bit past 150 yards - the first one standing entered in front of his right hip and exited behind his left shoulder and knocked him to the ground - the next 3 shots were running and each was a solid hit that traveled the length of the body. I had to reload between shots and was reloading a 2nd time when the PH ran up and finished him off --- he gotten back on his feet and was trying to catch up with the herd.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,530 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,530 Likes: 6 |
I'm a real fan of North Forks. Two 300 grain NF soft points (not even the stronger cup point) I recovered from a buffalo were perfectly mushroomed and weighed in excess of 290 grains. One had broken the buff's spine and I could not tell the difference between it and another that had penetrated an impala stem to stern. I used their solids on elephant, hippo, and follow ons for buffalo.
As for shooting cats in the head, the chest is a much easier target and skull measurements are how trophies are judged. Besides, the skulls look cool if they're not blown to bits.
Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.
Democrats would burn this country to the ground, if they could rule over the ashes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,638 |
And your point is? If a bullet flattens out and fails to penetrate, the animal may be lost or in the case of dangerous game, only serve to turn a hunt into a dangerous situation. In contrast if a Barnes fails to expand (highly unlikely with the bigger bores) it still punches through and makes TWO holes, still leading to bleeding out and death. But quick, go roust the other Barnes haters.... I watched a Barnes hit a whitetail in the ribs and then deflect up and exit out the neck. Was that due to it not expanding? The world will never know. Yes the animal was obviously recovered. But I still consider it a failure. If that bullet had picked a different angle to go the buck might have ran off. I'm not a Barnes hater. If I was, I wouldn't be shooting them in several rifles. I just don't buy into the whole thing about them being the worlds greatest bullet.
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle. I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
I don't either, and in fact most of the game I've ever taken has not been with either the TSX or the TTSX. I started using them for two reasons, they are the most consistently accurate hunting bullet I've ever uses (with the Partition on the other side of the spectrum), and lots and I mean lots of folks I know and respect, with literally hundreds of species taken, almost all swear by the TSX/TTSXs. My 300 Weatherby and H&H, for example, like both the NPs (and I took at least a half dozen animals in Africa with them) and the TTSXs, but in contrast, my 375, 257 and 7mmWeatherby do not shoot them well. So I go by either personal experience of advice from folks I know and trust. North Forks are also superb bullets according to all my friends who use them and they have indeed been accurate in the calibers I've used, so I would love to try them someday. Accuracy and consistent performance is what I look for, particularly on high dollar hunts, and in my observation, the Barnes' have proven to be the best.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
Jorge,
It is a mystery why some rifles love NPT's, other don't. Same with the TSX/TTSX; some like'em, some don't.
I've heard it postulated that the relatively open base on the NPT can spread somewhat, expanding to obdurate into a slightly oversized bore; better engagement of bullet with rifling, better accuracy.
Not sure if anyone really knows, but it has and is being observed. The Barnes are very uniform and can be extremely accurate. I find that with Cutting Edge copper bullets, similar results with GMX and E-Tips.
Do you find mono's to be more consistently accurate than NPT's, or said another way, do more rifles across the board perform better with mono's than NPT's?
I guess that's what makes Loony stuff so loony (and interesting)...
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
DF: I've only tried T/TTSXs and CBEs (in my 450 NE only) and I've found the Barnes' to be consistently more accurate than any other bullet in just about every caliber I've tried.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,189
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,189 |
I am truly a Barnes fan, but it was strongly suggested to me that I consider Swift A-Frame for my 2015 Cape Buffalo hunt in the Free State of the RSA. I was carrying a Dakota Model 76 in .416 Rigby with 400 gr A-Frame bullets. The initial shot dropped the buffalo in its tracks, but I "paid the insurance" with another shot to the heart as it was lying there. The bullet was recovered during the skinning process against the off side hide. The 400 gr A-Frame retained over 390 gr of its original weight. It was a high shoulder shot, but it worked for me. donsm70
Last edited by donsm70; 05/26/16.
Life Member...Safari Club International Life Member...Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Life Member...Keystone Country Elk Alliance Life Member...National Rifle Association
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
Don: That is exactly the same combo I used on buffalo. My friend used a 375, also with A Frames. That is what surprised me about the link I posted, although the impact velocity explains the failure and that is where the Barnes shines. I think anyway.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 592
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 592 |
Any thoughts on 250gr TTSX for buffalo?
Do or do not, there is no try.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,264 Likes: 42
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,264 Likes: 42 |
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
The 270 TSX has such a following, I guess the newer 250 TTSX is the step child.
To me, the 250 TTSX makes a lot of sense, better B.C. for a long shot and classic Barnes penetration.
I'd have to give it a serious look if going for buf. I've read some accounts claiming the 270 TSX is more accurate. I'm gonna try them both pretty soon and we'll see what my M-70 has to say about it.
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,845 Likes: 21
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,845 Likes: 21 |
The 270 TSX has such a following, I guess the newer 250 TTSX is the step child.
To me, the 250 TTSX makes a lot of sense, better B.C. for a long shot and classic Barnes penetration.
I'd have to give it a serious look if going for buf. I've read some accounts claiming the 270 TSX is more accurate. I'm gonna try them both pretty soon and we'll see what my M-70 has to say about it.
DF Huh?
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
The 270 TSX has such a following, I guess the newer 250 TTSX is the step child.
To me, the 250 TTSX makes a lot of sense, better B.C. for a long shot and classic Barnes penetration.
I'd have to give it a serious look if going for buf. I've read some accounts claiming the 270 TSX is more accurate. I'm gonna try them both pretty soon and we'll see what my M-70 has to say about it.
DF Huh? B.C.'s: 250 TTSX is .424; 270 TSX is .326. Barnes tops the 270 TSX at around 2,800+ fps. They don't currently have data for the 250 TTSX on their web site. Surely a 250 will fly a bit faster than a 270 out of the same gun. Higher velocity + higher B.C.'s = flatter trajectory. Both will penetrate and kill stuff. Just saying. DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,425
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,425 |
I'm sitting at 135 buffalo now, spread across 3 continents. Most were taken with a .458, but plenty were with the .375 and some with the .416, .450 and some 30 cals as well.
If there's a better buffalo bullet than the A-Frame I sure don't know what it is. The Barnes is OK, and a darn sight better than many but its no A-Frame. Solids suck in general.
Life begins at 40. Recoil begins at "Over 40" Coincidence? I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,296 Likes: 6
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,296 Likes: 6 |
I have taken a handful of Cape and NW Red Buffalo, maybe a dozen in total. I've shot them with .450/00. and the 9.3 x62, I've brained them 8mm Mag, dropped one on the run with a .338, and even used a handgun with the 9.3 JDJ. My hunting mates have used .375, .416, and .458s. I've found a few things to be true. - Premium expanding bullets are more effectiv than solids in rendering a quick take down. - a well placed shot on an undisturbed buffalo takes them without drama or complication. A shoulder/lung shot puts them down usually within yards. - Botch your first shot and they become near bullet proof and you must hit the central nervous system to bring them down quick. Damn what a beautiful ole hard bossed bull, Bob, what Hatari says would ring true with me, a 375 or 416 with three or four hundred gr Swift A Frames would be hard to beat imho.
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
I'm sitting at 135 buffalo now, spread across 3 continents. Most were taken with a .458, but plenty were with the .375 and some with the .416, .450 and some 30 cals as well.
If there's a better buffalo bullet than the A-Frame I sure don't know what it is. The Barnes is OK, and a darn sight better than many but its no A-Frame. Solids suck in general. That's really interesting....
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 633
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 633 |
I'm sitting at 135 buffalo now, spread across 3 continents. Most were taken with a .458, but plenty were with the .375 and some with the .416, .450 and some 30 cals as well.
If there's a better buffalo bullet than the A-Frame I sure don't know what it is. The Barnes is OK, and a darn sight better than many but its no A-Frame. Solids suck in general. ever try the woodleigh? just out of curiosity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
Gunner that IS a beautiful old bull!
They are impressive animals.
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
608 members (10gaugeman, 1100mag, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 01Foreman400, 58 invisible),
19,062
guests, and
1,349
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,979
Posts18,539,980
Members74,052
|
Most Online21,014 8 minutes ago
|
|
|
|