|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,886
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,886 |
Looking for a Glock pistol that can deliver 600-700 ft. lbs of energy.
Considering the Glock 21 in 45 ACP OR Glock 20 10mm.
On either pistol an aftermarket barrel with more case head support will be installed.
On the surface, it seems that the G21 45 ACP with aftermarket barrel could deliver equal power to the 10mm with the advantage of the ablity to use cheaper, more widely available ammo.
Besides the cost of a heavier recoil spring needed for the 45 is there a downside?
abusus non tollit usum
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755 |
You'd want a heavier recoil spring in either one anyway, the 10mm needs it as well.
Either one will do what you want, go with whichever you prefer. Both will benefit from longer barrels, and muzzle brakes help delay the slide unlocking if you can tolerate them.
IMO the 45 has a bit more muzzle flip, loaded to the same power level, because of bullet weight, but that's probably subjective and YMMV.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,886
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,886 |
abusus non tollit usum
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965 |
Not sure what you want to use your 600-700 ft lbs of energy for, but if it was me I would be looking at the MOS system Glocks such as the 41 (45ACP) or the 40 (10mm). They sport 6" barrels to give a bit of an energy bump there, not to mention longer sighting plane and steadier hold, and are also optics ready.
Personally, I want one of each. I'll get one this fall, just not sure which one to start with.
We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?
Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,666
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,666 |
Performance in the field, both will do basically the same job. The .45 has cheaper factory ammunition, but .45 super factory ammo is harder to find and more expensive.
Go with whichever one light's your fire.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755 |
Not sure what you want to use your 600-700 ft lbs of energy for, but if it was me I would be looking at the MOS system Glocks such as the 41 (45ACP) or the 40 (10mm). They sport 6" barrels to give a bit of an energy bump there, not to mention longer sighting plane and steadier hold, and are also optics ready.
Personally, I want one of each. I'll get one this fall, just not sure which one to start with. One comment about this (not posting to contradict you, but it's something worth considering) - Slide mass on Glocks is important to delay unlocking with heavy loads. I haven't weighed the 40 and 41 slides next to the 20 and 21, but I think the new models have lighter slides. That's fine for .45 ACP and watered down "10mm lite" factory ammo, but not ideal for heavy loads. You can't make up for that reduced mass with a heavier spring.
Last edited by Yondering; 07/29/16.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 944
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 944 |
The longer slides are slimmer...
I don't know if they are lighter because they are longer, but consider that the barrel is also a part of the initial inertial mass before it unlocks. Since the barrel is longer as well it adds some additional mass.
So to compare the two, factoring in the added weight of the longer barrel by weighing the barrel and slide together will be a better comparison of the two...aside from actually shooting them side by side.
The long slides seem to shoot the heavier loads fine.
To the OP, I'm not sure what your interest is in achieving 700 ft lbs of energy. ME is way down the scale of evaluating how a round will perform on game.
Much more important in the equation is bullet construction and nose shape, velocity is a distant second, caliber still farther down the scale and shot placement trumps all...500 vs 700 ft pounds makes no difference in the larger scheme of things.
I know that some states have minimum ME rules for hunting, but a load designed to meet the minimum may not be as effective in the hunting field as a better load with less energy, if one focuses only on the muzzle energy factor.
Of course I don't expect lawmakers to understand that.
"Supernatural divinities are the primitive's answer to why the sun goes down at night..."
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,886
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,886 |
...To the OP, I'm not sure what your interest is in achieving 700 ft lbs of energy. ME is way down the scale of evaluating how a round will perform on game.
I view various handgun cartridges as falling (according to muzzle energy) into various power classes; Penetration and expansion being adjusted through bullet design/construction. I don't plan on shooting dangerous big game with a handgun, but if I did, I'd surely want "magnum power" i.e. > 600 ft. lbs. Whether I'm "correct" in my preference for "magnum power" is academic because 99.9% of a handgun's job could be done with something like a Makarov or maybe even a Lorcin 9mm. But a rugged reliable high capacity auto pistol in the 357-41 magnum power class - well, it's useful and interesting in its own right. Thanks again to everyone for their insight and information!
Last edited by night_owl; 07/29/16.
abusus non tollit usum
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755 |
Good reply night_owl, I agree completely.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,121
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,121 |
Here’s some fodder for your consideration.
I’ve kicked your idea around several times over the years and have thus far just stayed with the .45 acp cartridge. I’ve taken five bucks with my Glocks (G21 & G30) using standard pressure and +P ammunition with 200 and 230 gr JHP’s.
One of my hunting buds has taken three deer with his G20 and 180 gr JHP’s.
All of our kills have been essentially one-shot affairs but he has never experienced full penetration while I achieve pass through performance about 50% of the time. Recovery distances have been pretty much identical with all animals found within 75 yards.
When making these comparisons, it's worth noting that most Glock 10mm's will not operate reliably with bullets over 200 grains or any standard weight bullet (180-200 gr) driven faster than @ 1200 fps. That rules out most of the boutique/specialty loads that are clearly more powerful, but just don’t work well in Glocks.
With these realities in mind, I just don’t see that the 10mm offers any practical benefit over a .45 caliber bullet at a relatively comparable velocity. If I can achieve 90% of reliable 10mm performance with a +P load in .45 acp, I think that’s a pretty good indicator the .45 Super will best the 10mm in the field without difficulty.
With all that said however, I do think the 10mm offers some potential for better is penetration when non-expanding, solid bullets are used.
Lastly, if you really want to experience the maximum performance from the 10mm or .45 Super, I think a ported or compensated barrel is the only proper way to address the inevitable issues relating to reliability and durability of your pistol.
The uninitiated are always easily impressed. NRA Endowment Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,694
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,694 |
Here’s some fodder for your consideration...
When making these comparisons, it's worth noting that most Glock 10mm's will not operate reliably with bullets over 200 grains or any standard weight bullet (180-200 gr) driven faster than @ 1200 fps. That rules out most of the boutique/specialty loads that are clearly more powerful, but just don’t work well in Glocks.
With these realities in mind... What are you basing these "considerations and realities" on?
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,144 Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,144 Likes: 4 |
My question is what JHP's were y'all using? Apples to apples or other.
I am not taking sides in the 10 vs 45 Super, just wondering. And I think if we move up to the 460 Roland, that is a different animal again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 366
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 366 |
My question is what JHP's were y'all using? Apples to apples or other.
I am not taking sides in the 10 vs 45 Super, just wondering. And I think if we move up to the 460 Roland, that is a different animal again. Good point about the 460 Rowland, which should be noted, since 45 Super can be hand loaded up to that level as long as the barrel has a well-supported chamber. A muzzle device is essentially required too. If I weren't already invested in 10mm, I might go the 45 Super route. But, there's something to be said for 15 rounds of 700 ft-lbs without a muzzle device. And with practice, the 10mm can be controlled well enough for rapid firing. In that regard, it has advantages over the 45 Super/Rowland just like the 9 has over the 40. Or maybe that's just how I tell myself to think so I don't have to switch horses
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
If your goal is 200 gr @ 1200 fps, IMHO the 10mm is a better choice, if you want 250’s @ 1000 fps, then the 45 super is your only choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
If your goal is 200 gr @ 1200 fps, IMHO the 10mm is a better choice, if you want 250’s @ 1000 fps, then the 45 super is your only choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,938 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,938 Likes: 1 |
10mm 180 XTP @ 1300 plus VS 45 Super 230 XTP @ 1100 plus Same depth of penetration and Ray Charles could see which one left the larger wound channel
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,121
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,121 |
10mm 180 XTP @ 1300 plus VS 45 Super 230 XTP @ 1100 plus Same depth of penetration and Ray Charles could see which one left the larger wound channel A picture is worth a thousand words.
The uninitiated are always easily impressed. NRA Endowment Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755 |
When making these comparisons, it's worth noting that most Glock 10mm's will not operate reliably with bullets over 200 grains or any standard weight bullet (180-200 gr) driven faster than @ 1200 fps. That rules out most of the boutique/specialty loads that are clearly more powerful, but just don’t work well in Glocks.
With all due respect, that's a bunch of hooey. You may have malfunctions with heavy loads and the stock recoil spring, but anyone who spends 5 minutes researching 10mm loads and the G20 should realize they need a heavier spring for heavy loads. As I pointed out earlier, that's a requirement for either the 45 Super or full power 10mm, and either one will get the job done.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,312 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,312 Likes: 1 |
good post, even the .40 smith and wesson is close on the heels of the 10.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,045
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,045 |
good post, even the .40 smith and wesson is close on the heels of the 10. The 40 S&W is not even close to the 10mm. Comparing Underwood ammo 155 gr loads for each cartridge shows that the 10mm is far superior to the 40 S&W. 200 FPS and 192 FPE is a significant difference. From the Underwood ammo website. https://www.underwoodammo.com/40-s-w-155-grain-xtp-jacketed-hollow-point/Technical Information: Caliber: 40 S&W Bullet Weight: 155 Grains Bullet Style: Hornady XTP Jacketed Hollow Point Case Type: Ducta-Bright 7a Nickel Plated Brass Ballistics Information: Muzzle Velocity: 1300 fps Muzzle Energy: 582 ft. lbs. https://www.underwoodammo.com/10mm-auto-155-grain-xtp-jacketed-hollow-point/Technical Information Caliber: 10mm Auto Bullet Weight: 155 Grains Bullet Style: Jacketed Hollow Point Case Type: Ducta-Bright 7a Nickel Plated Brass Ballistics Information: Muzzle Velocity: 1500 fps Muzzle Energy: 774 ft. lbs.
The Second Amendment isn't about Hunting. It's about Freedom.
FJB Let's Go Brandon
|
|
|
|
548 members (1OntarioJim, 06hunter59, 204guy, 12344mag, 219DW, 1Longbow, 70 invisible),
2,438
guests, and
1,212
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,302
Posts18,487,100
Members73,967
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|