|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506 |
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494 |
well if I was going to post there, but I don't..... I'd have to say hunters are not to blame, if anyone in the formula is, it would be poor management that would continue to allow hunters to shoot animals.
Although there is so much out there about perfect herd numbers so many differing thoughts of more is better or that less is best due to the worst case scenarios and all in between, its hard to point an educated figure.
I"ll say this IMHO, regulated hunting isn't going to extinct a herd and so, while it'll effect it, it won't extinct it and I think that should be clear, as long as the regulating agencies are not totally blind or bribed.
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
Somehow I don't think the article is going to suddenly make anyone a rabid anti hunter. If they were anti hunting before reading they article, they'd just say uh huh, if they were favorable to hunting they'd think well sure if you kill animals that contributes to a declining heard.
Sounds like a thread by someone who's just looking to be butt hurt about something. And the usual idiots adding their two cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506 |
Well mark Richards is very anti non resident hunter and stid is right up their with him.. mark Richards has something up his sleeve more than likely some type of anti resident stuff..
Last edited by 79S; 11/29/16.
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,831 |
Well mark Richards is very anti resident hunter and stid is right up their with him.. mark Richards has something up his sleeve more than likely some type of anti resident stuff.. They always seem more pro resident to me than anti...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506 |
Well mark Richards is very anti resident hunter and stid is right up their with him.. mark Richards has something up his sleeve more than likely some type of anti resident stuff.. They always seem more pro resident to me than anti... Meant anti resident ah [bleep] you knew what I meant 😁 I fixed it...
Last edited by 79S; 11/29/16.
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494 |
Somehow I don't think the article is going to suddenly make anyone a rabid anti hunter. If they were anti hunting before reading they article, they'd just say uh huh, if they were favorable to hunting they'd think well sure if you kill animals that contributes to a declining heard.
Sounds like a thread by someone who's just looking to be butt hurt about something. And the usual idiots adding their two cents. You are right, IMHO, but its not the ones that are already pro or anti, its the neutral folks you always want to consider....
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506 |
Somehow I don't think the article is going to suddenly make anyone a rabid anti hunter. If they were anti hunting before reading they article, they'd just say uh huh, if they were favorable to hunting they'd think well sure if you kill animals that contributes to a declining heard.
Sounds like a thread by someone who's just looking to be butt hurt about something. And the usual idiots adding their two cents. You are right, IMHO, but its not the ones that are already pro or anti, its the neutral folks you always want to consider.... Exactly people read that and supposed expert representing Alaskan hunters says hunting has an effect in the herd people will think oh these hunters are the reason the the caribou are in decline..
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,309 Likes: 28
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,309 Likes: 28 |
I remember reading that hunting is responsible for only about 10% of all mortality in a population.
Predation, habitat loss, disease, etc. account for much more.
If you take the time it takes, it takes less time. --Pat Parelli
American by birth; Alaskan by choice. --ironbender
|
|
|
|
63 members (300_savage, 35, BallisticBRYAN, Akhutr, 338reddog, 9 invisible),
1,378
guests, and
848
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,208
Posts18,503,884
Members73,994
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|