Looking to get some in put from people who have or have had a 338 Federal. What kind of velocity were you able to get and how was the performance on game? Better than a .308 win with heavy bullets? Also what length of barrel are you running?
Thanks,
CT
160 TTSX: 3015 with AA2230, 2900+ with 8208
180 BT/Accubond: 2700s with TAC or 8208, 2800+ with AA2230
185 TTSX: 2730 with TAC or 8208, 2800+ with AA2230
200s (Accubonds, SSTs, Hot Cors): 2660ish with TAC or 8208
210 Partition: 2580-2600 with LVR or 2000MR
I've had two different 338 Federals, an M77 Hawkeye and now a Kimber 84M. Both with 22" barrels.
I've shot a sampling of critters including deer (185 TTSX), elk (185 TTSX, 160 TTSX, 180 BT), hog (185 TTSX), Impala (160 TTSX), Blesbok (160 TTSX), Gemsbok (160 TTSX), Waterbuck (160 TTSX) and Kudu (160 TTSX). Never lost an animal, never had one go far enough that it took longer than 30 seconds to track. Furthest an animal has gone is maybe
4030yds? Most just a few steps. As for performance beyond the obvious, they died right there; the 160 TTSX is a wicked bullet, but it does take out a lot of meat in the shoulders. The 185TTSX does far more internal damage than the relatively small exit holes would indicate. The 180 BT kills fine, but does not penetrate quite as well.
Is it better than a .308 with 180s? I've only shot one buck with a 180 partition out of a 308 Win and it was not that much different (I was cheating though, that was the old Federal high energy load being fired out of a 26" barreled 308. Basically equaled a 30-06). But I could probably say that about many cartridges. The differences in how bullets act is likely a greater variable. There is no doubt the 338 puts a bit more oomph behind the bullet though. Basically the 338 Fed shoots the same weight bullet as the 30-06 at the same speed. A little less BC, a little greater diameter. Depending on how far you shoot, and elevation, you can decide if its a viable tradeoff.