Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire 9th Circuit Decision May Not Stand For Long

Agree. The COTUS is was written by men without an 8yr college degree from a puking liberal ivy league elitest colleg. It states plainly what the rules are. Any high school grad should be able to grasp and understand it.

Very much in agreement!

The game is checkers, yet they still continue to play chess!

Yep, US code 8 ,section 1182 is VERY clear on the Presidents power to limit aliens in the interest of the country. They overstepped their bounds....

Is anyone really naïve enough to believe that the 9th might reverse itself. pssstttt......want a good deal on a skyhook.

With this record of 85% wrong decisions it should be time to fire and replace them. Would anyone be able to hold a real job in the private sector with an 85% failure rate?

If Trump, 're' - Issues an EO, that addresses the concern which prompted the first suit, and replaces the First EO, will that not render the 9ths Rulings moot?

I don't entertain delusions about the SC reversing it either.

It'll take the liberals about 20 minutes to run down and file a new suit.

Cockblocking. That's what they do.

Ed, Someone posted a graph a day or two ago showing that a couple of other Circuits were not far behind the Ninth as far as reversals.

Maybe there's a couple more circuits than just the 9th we need to squish?

Activist judges have to be impeached and that starts with you and I contacting our congresscritters to do so. They will not do this with out the electorate getting behind it HARD. NOT preserving protecting and defending the Constitution has to be an impeachable offense and WE the People must become engaged to hold congresses feet to the fire so they will act on it.

WE are on the offensive and must strike while the iron is hot...

And 2018 is just right around the corner...

Extremely unusual. Courts do not request briefs; they are petitioned for re hearings and appeals. To have a court request briefs preemptively is very, very rare.

Extraordinarily rare.

A judge on the 9th making that "request" is essentially a demand.

I'd suspect that judge was Alex Kozinski.

Like I said in one of the 20 other threads on this matter. Total setup!!!!

Listen to the Lawyer guys.

I can't remember the last time I've seen this.

Nah, the libs will blame Trump, or maybe Bush.

This is even more ugly than it seems.

The Supreme Court only accepts 3% of the requests for a hearing in the SC.

These a$$holes are wrong 85% of the time, but only 3% of the mistakes they make are fixed by the Supremes.

Lotsa people gettin fcked over in the 9th.

Courts have lost any respectability they once had, anyway, just another reinforcement of the faking of the due process the Constitution guarantees.

Mgw619: Your sentiment is commendable but your observation is naive to the extreme!
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has been entirely, completely and unwaveringly outlandishly liberal for the last 45+ years, that I know of.
I began dealing with them in the late 1960's and their decisions have been unwaveringly political (liberal!) every year since then.
That is the main reason their opinions that go on to the Supreme Court of the United States are reversed 86% of the time!
These 9th Circuit Court "judges" are judicial activist (they make judicial decisions based on their political GOALS not in accordance with or based on laws made by citizens through our Senators and Representatives!)!
In short they are liberal leaning "activists" not judges.
Its sad they have been so, for so long!
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

Maybe the reason for the 9th's panic:

"Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism, a finding that clashes sharply with claims from an appeals court that there is "no evidence" those countries have produced a terrorist."

"The Center's director of policy studies, Jessica M. Vaughan, based her blockbuster report on a 2016 report from the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, then chaired by new Attorney General Jeff Sessions, that report found that 380 out of 580 people convicted in terror cases since 9/11 were foreign-born.

She received further information on many in the report to conclude that 72 of those convicted of terrorism come from the seven nations target by Trump."

"These immigrant terrorists lived in at least 16 different states, with the largest number from the terror-associated countries living in New York (10), Minnesota (8), California (8), and Michigan (6). Ironically, Minnesota was one of the states suing to block Trump's order to pause entries from the terror-associated countries, claiming it harmed the state. At least two of the terrorists were living in Washington, which joined with Minnesota in the lawsuit to block the order."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...countries-trump-targeted/article/2614582